agentleFS
dpleshakovdpleshakov/tfscli/.claude/skills/tasks/SKILL.md

tasks

Skill1 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub

Universal task-file workflow — create a structured tasks file for work that starts now and needs a plan agreed with the user, and execute it step by step, tracking what is done vs. pending in any project. Not for fixing review findings, a single fix, or another change done directly. No project-specific assumptions.

49 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use send-user-message, tinyagi-admin and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Maliot100XSkill

    send-user-message

    Send a proactive message to a paired user via their channel (Discord, Telegram, or WhatsApp). Use when the agent needs to notify, alert, or send an unsolicited message to a user — especially during heartbeat invocations, scheduled tasks, or when the agent wants to reach out without a prior user message in the current conversation. Triggers: 'send message to user', 'notify user', 'alert user', 'message the user on discord/telegram/whatsapp', or any need to proactively communicate with a paired sender.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • jlia0Skill

    tinyagi-admin

    Manage and operate the TinyAGI system itself — agents, teams, settings, queue, tasks, daemon lifecycle, and source code. Use when the agent needs to: list/add/remove/update agents or teams, check queue status, view logs, start/stop/restart TinyAGI, change settings (provider, model, channels), send messages to the queue, manage tasks, retry dead-letter messages, view recent responses, modify TinyAGI source code or configuration, or perform any administrative operation on the TinyAGI platform. Triggers: 'manage tinyagi', 'add an agent', 'remove a team', 'check queue', 'view logs', 'restart tinyagi', 'change provider', 'update settings', 'create a task', 'modify tinyagi code'.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ArvorCoSkill

    constitution

    Create or update the project constitution - personalized governance and coding principles. Use when starting a project or updating project standards. Triggers on: create constitution, update principles, set project rules.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • ArvorCoSkill

    specify

    Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    quality

    Evaluates whether a GitHub issue is spam, empty, needs more information, or is OK to proceed.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • anyprotoSkill

    skills-manager

    Context-aware routing to skills and hooks management. Use when troubleshooting skill activation, fine-tuning keywords, or managing the automated documentation system.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +1 more from ArvorCo

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 42 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If the current repository contains .claude/skills/tasks/SKILL.md and that file is not the one you are reading, read it and follow it …

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    When such work turns out to change the approach — the user has to approve a decision before the work goes on — it has become work that …

    line 31
  3. Distinctive:

    Use the following format verbatim.

    line 54
  4. Very specific:

    Write the status text verbatim.

    line 105
  5. Very specific:

    Write the file to the tasks directory with header Active and every task Pending, numbered TASK-01, TASK-02, … in order.

    line 127
  6. Distinctive:

    Do the work for that one task only — do not run ahead into later tasks.

    line 137
  7. Very specific:

    When its definition of done is met, set its status to Done.

    line 138
  8. Distinctive:

    Same-commit rule: when the task's work is committed, the updated tasks file goes into that same commit — never a separate status-only …

    line 139
  9. Very specific:

    When every task in the file is resolved — the last one is done or skipped, or the last Pending ones are removed — change the header to …

    line 143
  10. Distinctive:

    When the work shows that the plan is wrong, change it as described in "Changing the plan".

    line 146
  11. Very specific:

    When work in an Active file stops before every task is resolved and is to be resumed later, record its goal and the decisions already made …

    line 170
  12. Very specific:

    if everything in the file is carried over — it has no Done task and no record worth keeping on its own — delete it.

    line 175
  13. Distinctive:

    Never leave a finished task unmarked — the file is the source of truth for progress.

    line 184

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 42 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

A portable, file-based way to record and track work in any repository. It keeps "what is done vs. what is left" unambiguous: a single markdown file holds an ordered list of atomic tasks, each with a plain-text status. The skill requires no particular tooling or project files and imposes no fixed task categories.

Project version first

If the current repository contains .claude/skills/tasks/SKILL.md and that file is not the one you are reading, read it and follow it instead of this file.

Where the project's own documentation (for example CONTRIBUTING.md or CLAUDE.md) sets a different convention, the project's convention wins over this skill.

When a tasks file is warranted

A tasks file holds a plan. Work gets one when it needs a plan: it breaks down into several tasks, the breakdown is agreed with the user before the work starts, or the work may outlast one session.

Work that needs no plan is done directly, and its commit messages explain it. This includes fixing the findings of a review of the current branch, a single fix, and a small change the user asked for. Such work gets no tasks file even when the user leaves the details to you, and even when it touches several files.

When such work turns out to change the approach — the user has to approve a decision before the work goes on — it has become work that needs a plan: agree the decision with the user, then create a tasks file for the work that follows from it.

Mode detection

Decide what to do from the user's request and the current context:

  • A path to an existing Active tasks file is given, or the request names no new work and exactly one Active file exists in the tasks directory (see "The tasks file") → Execute mode.
  • A feature or request description is given and no matching file exists → Create mode (breakdown), then offer to start executing. Work that needs no plan (see "When a tasks file is warranted") or is not to start now (see "Create mode") does not get a tasks file.
  • The request names no new work and no Active file exists → propose starting the next item from where the project keeps accepted work that has not started, if it has such a place, as Create mode; otherwise ask the user what to work on.
  • Ambiguous (e.g. several active files, or unclear whether to create or execute) → ask the user one short question before proceeding.

The tasks file

Use the following format verbatim.

  • Name: YYYY-MM-DD-tasks-{slug}.md — the date prefix orders files and avoids name collisions; {slug} is a short kebab-case name for the feature/work.
  • Location: active files live in the tasks directory: the directory that already holds the project's active tasks files, or the parent of the archive/ directory that holds its archived ones; otherwise the directory where the project keeps its documentation; otherwise docs/, created if it does not exist. Completed files move to the archive/ subdirectory of the tasks directory.
  • Header status: **Status:** Active while in progress; **Status:** Archived once every task is resolved — Done or Skipped.

Layout

# YYYY-MM-DD-tasks-{slug}.md

**Status:** Active

## Context

[Optional, free-form. Shared decisions, constraints, or notes that span several
tasks. Omit the whole section if there is nothing to record.]

---

### TASK-01 `short-name`
**Description:** what to do
**Definition of done:** an observable, checkable outcome
**Status:** Pending

### TASK-02 `short-name`
**Description:** ...
**Definition of done:** ...
**Status:** Pending

There are no task types and no cross-references between tasks. Every task has the same four fields.

Status values

StatusMeaning
PendingNot started.
In progressCurrently being worked on.
DoneDefinition of done is met.
Skipped — <reason>Intentionally not done; reason recorded inline.

A task is resolved when it is Done or Skipped.

Write the status text verbatim. The only status that carries extra text is Skipped, which appends its reason. Never annotate a Pending task — do not mark one as "next", do not rank candidates, do not add any note to it. The next task to do is the one already In progress, if any, and otherwise the topmost Pending one; that is self-evident and needs no marker.

Create mode (breakdown)

A tasks file is created when the work starts, not in advance: most of the effort before that is discussion and decisions, and a breakdown made ahead of time goes stale.

  1. Confirm that the work needs a plan (see "When a tasks file is warranted"). If it does not, do it directly, without a tasks file.
  2. Confirm that the work starts now. If it does not — the user wants it recorded, noted, or kept for later — do not create a tasks file. Record it where the project keeps accepted work that has not started, if it has such a place; otherwise ask the user where it should go. If the work was recorded there earlier, use that record as the input to the breakdown and take it out as that place's rules require.
  3. Turn the feature/request into a complete, ordered list of atomic tasks — each one achievable in a single focused session, with a definition of done that can be checked.
  4. Propose the task structure to the user and let them adjust before writing anything.
  5. Write the file to the tasks directory with header Active and every task Pending, numbered TASK-01, TASK-02, … in order.
  6. Offer to start executing the first task.

Execute mode (tracking discipline)

  1. The next task is the one already In progress, if any — for example, one left unfinished by an interrupted session; otherwise it is the topmost Pending one, and when you start working on it, set its status to In progress. No decision is required either way. Do not start or mark the other Pending tasks.
  2. Do the work for that one task only — do not run ahead into later tasks.
  3. When its definition of done is met, set its status to Done.
  4. Same-commit rule: when the task's work is committed, the updated tasks file goes into that same commit — never a separate status-only commit. This skill follows the project's normal commit cadence and does not force commits the user did not ask for; it only governs how the file participates when a commit happens.
  5. When every task in the file is resolved — the last one is done or skipped, or the last Pending ones are removed — change the header to Archived and move the file to the archive/ subdirectory, in the commit that brings the file to that state.
  6. When the work shows that the plan is wrong, change it as described in "Changing the plan".

Changing the plan

The Pending tasks are a plan, not a record, and the plan changes when the work shows it is wrong: a task turns out to be needed, a description contains a mistake, two tasks contradict each other, or a task is redundant. A task whose outcome is a decision often determines the tasks that follow it; those are added once the decision is made.

  • Pending tasks may be added, edited, reordered, or removed, and the Context section may be updated. Propose every such change to the user before writing it, as when creating the file.
  • Done tasks are not rewritten: they record what was done, and commits refer to them.
  • A task that was a mistake in the plan — a duplicate, a contradiction, a task not needed — is removed. A task that is deliberately not done, where the reason is worth knowing later, is marked Skipped — <reason> instead.
  • The order of execution is the order in the file. When tasks are added, removed, or reordered, the Pending tasks may be renumbered so that the numbers follow that order. Done, Skipped, and In progress tasks keep their numbers, since commits may refer to them, and a renumbered task never takes a number that one of them holds.

Postponing the work

When work in an Active file stops before every task is resolved and is to be resumed later, record its goal and the decisions already made where the project keeps accepted work that has not started, if it has such a place; otherwise ask the user. Then, in the same commit:

  • if everything in the file is carried over — it has no Done task and no record worth keeping on its own — delete it;
  • otherwise mark the unresolved tasks Skipped — postponed and archive the file, so that the work already done stays on record.

Invariants

  • A tasks file holds a plan; work that needs no plan gets no tasks file.
  • Tasks are atomic; work on one at a time.
  • Never leave a finished task unmarked — the file is the source of truth for progress.
  • Done tasks are never rewritten; Pending tasks change when the plan proves wrong.
  • The tasks file travels with the work it describes in a single commit.
  • Archive the file (header + move to archive/) once every task is resolved.
  • Require no particular project files or tooling; follow the project's documented conventions where they exist.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.