agentleFS
dougwithseismicdougwithseismic/geo-kit/skills/geo-audit/SKILL.md

geo-audit

Skill2 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub

Audit a website's readiness to be cited by AI search engines (ChatGPT search, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Perplexity, Claude). Use when asked to "audit our AI SEO / GEO", "why aren't we cited by ChatGPT", "check our AI-crawler access", or before starting GEO work. Produces a prioritized gap report.

20 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use geo, seo-local and 1 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ORBWEVASkill

    geo

    Generative Engine Optimization — optimize content for AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini). Use when user wants to rank in AI search, improve AI citability, audit content for LLM visibility, or explicitly invokes /geo commands. Triggers on "GEO", "generative engine", "AI search", "AI overviews", "citability", "Perplexity", "ChatGPT search", or /geo commands.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • mangollcSkill

    seo-local

    Local SEO optimization: Google Business Profile post generation, 30-day posting calendars, NAP consistency checks, local citation audits, review response templates, local keywords.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • megastepSkill

    seo-schema

    Detect, validate, and generate Schema.org structured data. JSON-LD format preferred. Use when user says "schema", "structured data", "rich results", "JSON-LD", or "markup".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    OG image / canonical: default OG image resolves (not 404)?

    line 48
  2. Very specific:

    Check Organization for sameAs, founder, areaServed, knowsAbout.

    line 58
  3. Distinctive:

    Search the brand name unscoped in an AI engine's own search tool (Claude's WebSearch, standard mode).

    line 75

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

GEO Audit

Inventory a site's Generative-Engine-Optimization surface and emit a prioritized gap report. Work top-to-bottom; report findings with concrete file paths / URLs and a fix for each. Grounded in the geo-kit playbook (embedded below so this skill is self-contained).

Step 1 — Crawler access (do this FIRST; it gates everything)

The #1 failure mode is an edge/CDN silently blocking AI crawlers. Verify from outside the app:

for ua in GPTBot OAI-SearchBot ChatGPT-User ClaudeBot Claude-SearchBot Claude-User PerplexityBot CCBot; do
  echo "$ua -> $(curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' -A "$ua" https://TARGET/)"
done
  • 403/503 on the retrieval/user agents (OAI-SearchBot, Claude-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, ChatGPT-User, Claude-User, Perplexity-User) = critical blocker — the site cannot be cited by that engine. Usual cause: Cloudflare "Block AI Scrapers / AI Crawl Control", or a robots.txt Disallow for those agents. Flag it as blocker #1.
  • On Cloudflare, check the zone-wide policy (Security → Settings → "AI Crawler and Agent access policies"), not just the per-crawler toggles in AI Crawl Control → Security, which the policy locks. "Training: Disallow" has blocked Claude-User (live in-answer fetches), because Cloudflare files it under Training. "Bot Preference Sync" is what injects the managed robots.txt block.
  • A faked user-agent only tests the rule. CDNs verify real bots by IP, so confirm with real bot hits in server logs after any change.
  • Fetch robots.txt and check: is there ONE coherent file? Correct sitemap URL? Are the retrieval agents allowed? Any managed/injected block (e.g. Cloudflare "Content-Signal ai-train=no")?

Step 2 — Indexability & hygiene

  • SSR check: fetch a key page and strip <script> — is the primary content in the raw HTML? AI crawlers don't run JS; client-only content is invisible.
  • Sitemap: does /sitemap.xml exist and cover every citable route (blog, location pages, key routes)? Any orphan pages absent from it?
  • Bing: is the site in Bing Webmaster Tools? (ChatGPT grounds via Bing.) Is IndexNow set up?
  • OG image / canonical: default OG image resolves (not 404)? Canonicals set?

Step 3 — Structured data

Grep the rendered HTML for application/ld+json. Inventory schema types present and missing:

  • Expected where relevant: Organization + WebSite (home), BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, Article/NewsArticle (blog), plus domain schema (Event/Product/LocalBusiness).
  • Check Organization for sameAs, founder, areaServed, knowsAbout.
  • Flag fabricated/invalid data (e.g. an Event with a made-up startDate).

Step 4 — On-page structure (sample the top pages)

For each sampled page, does it have:

  • An answer-first summary in the first screen (40–70 words)?
  • Question-styled headings?
  • Sourced statistics?
  • An FAQ section emitting FAQPage JSON-LD?
  • Visible EEAT (author, credentials, primary sources) and an updated date?

Step 5 — Off-site & entity (report, don't fix)

  • Wikidata/Wikipedia entity present? Google Business Profile (for local)? Branded mentions in local/niche press? YouTube presence?
  • Search the brand name unscoped in an AI engine's own search tool (Claude's WebSearch, standard mode). If an aggregator (Eventbrite, Meetup, a directory) takes the results instead of the homepage, the engine doesn't know the brand.

Step 6 — Each engine's view (if time allows)

Whether agents find, open and cite the site depends on their own search index, not Google's. Check it directly with Claude's WebSearch tool:

  • allowed_domains: ["TARGET"] with a broad word → indexed at all?
  • 3–5 terms where the site is top 10 on Google, unscoped → does it rank there?
  • The same terms in extended mode → a ranking-depth problem? Agents almost always use standard.

"Indexed but never ranks" is an entity/authority gap, not a content gap. For a full measurement, use the geo-fanout skill.

Output — the gap report

Rank findings by leverage, not order found:

  1. Blockers (crawler 403s, client-only rendering) — nothing else matters until fixed.
  2. High (missing schema, no answer-first structure, sitemap gaps, no IndexNow/Bing, brand unknown to an engine's index).
  3. Medium (EEAT, freshness, OG, entity signals).
  4. Explicitly skip — call out any llms.txt/speakable/mass-thin-page work as folklore (no engine consumes llms.txt; page count barely correlates with AI visibility). Don't recommend them.

For each finding: what, where (path/URL), the fix, and the expected impact. If geo-kit's playbook/ is available, cite the relevant section; otherwise the rules above are self-sufficient.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.