geo-audit
Skill2 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
Audit a website's readiness to be cited by AI search engines (ChatGPT search, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Perplexity, Claude). Use when asked to "audit our AI SEO / GEO", "why aren't we cited by ChatGPT", "check our AI-crawler access", or before starting GEO work. Produces a prioritized gap report.
20 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- alpit-patel/seo-aeo-geo-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Ghanyte/geo-seo-audittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Gallyan/trouvabletheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jiguang9/geo-audittheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- DoddleHQ/doddle-seo-geo-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- try-era/geo-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use geo, seo-local and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ORBWEVASkillgeo
Generative Engine Optimization — optimize content for AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini). Use when user wants to rank in AI search, improve AI citability, audit content for LLM visibility, or explicitly invokes /geo commands. Triggers on "GEO", "generative engine", "AI search", "AI overviews", "citability", "Perplexity", "ChatGPT search", or /geo commands.
Also in 6 projects that use this
mangollcSkillseo-local
Local SEO optimization: Google Business Profile post generation, 30-day posting calendars, NAP consistency checks, local citation audits, review response templates, local keywords.
Also in 3 projects that use this
megastepSkillseo-schema
Detect, validate, and generate Schema.org structured data. JSON-LD format preferred. Use when user says "schema", "structured data", "rich results", "JSON-LD", or "markup".
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions20 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 20
- zubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claude★ 11ksame name
- vellum-ai/vellum-assistant★ 1.5ksame name
- me2resh/apexyard★ 542same name
- Cognitic-Labs/geoskills★ 30same name
- techhorizonlabs/thl-open★ 16same name
- Ghanyte/geo-seo-audit★ 9same name
- greglas75/zuvo★ 7same name
- jiguang9/geo-audit★ 3same name
- alpit-patel/seo-aeo-geo-kit★ 2same name
- HermeticOrmus/LibreGEO-Claude-Code★ 1same name
10 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.
- geo-contentSkill
- geo-fanoutSkill
- geo-measureSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 48
OG image / canonical: default OG image resolves (not 404)?
- Very specific: line 58
Check Organization for sameAs, founder, areaServed, knowsAbout.
- Distinctive: line 75
Search the brand name unscoped in an AI engine's own search tool (Claude's WebSearch, standard mode).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
GEO Audit
Inventory a site's Generative-Engine-Optimization surface and emit a prioritized gap report. Work top-to-bottom; report findings with concrete file paths / URLs and a fix for each. Grounded in the geo-kit playbook (embedded below so this skill is self-contained).
Step 1 — Crawler access (do this FIRST; it gates everything)
The #1 failure mode is an edge/CDN silently blocking AI crawlers. Verify from outside the app:
for ua in GPTBot OAI-SearchBot ChatGPT-User ClaudeBot Claude-SearchBot Claude-User PerplexityBot CCBot; do
echo "$ua -> $(curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' -A "$ua" https://TARGET/)"
done403/503on the retrieval/user agents (OAI-SearchBot,Claude-SearchBot,PerplexityBot,ChatGPT-User,Claude-User,Perplexity-User) = critical blocker — the site cannot be cited by that engine. Usual cause: Cloudflare "Block AI Scrapers / AI Crawl Control", or arobots.txtDisallowfor those agents. Flag it as blocker #1.- On Cloudflare, check the zone-wide policy (Security → Settings → "AI Crawler
and Agent access policies"), not just the per-crawler toggles in AI Crawl
Control → Security, which the policy locks. "Training: Disallow" has blocked
Claude-User(live in-answer fetches), because Cloudflare files it under Training. "Bot Preference Sync" is what injects the managed robots.txt block. - A faked user-agent only tests the rule. CDNs verify real bots by IP, so confirm with real bot hits in server logs after any change.
- Fetch
robots.txtand check: is there ONE coherent file? Correct sitemap URL? Are the retrieval agents allowed? Any managed/injected block (e.g. Cloudflare "Content-Signal ai-train=no")?
Step 2 — Indexability & hygiene
- SSR check: fetch a key page and strip
<script>— is the primary content in the raw HTML? AI crawlers don't run JS; client-only content is invisible. - Sitemap: does
/sitemap.xmlexist and cover every citable route (blog, location pages, key routes)? Any orphan pages absent from it? - Bing: is the site in Bing Webmaster Tools? (ChatGPT grounds via Bing.) Is IndexNow set up?
- OG image / canonical: default OG image resolves (not 404)? Canonicals set?
Step 3 — Structured data
Grep the rendered HTML for application/ld+json. Inventory schema types present
and missing:
- Expected where relevant:
Organization+WebSite(home),BreadcrumbList,FAQPage,Article/NewsArticle(blog), plus domain schema (Event/Product/LocalBusiness). - Check
OrganizationforsameAs,founder,areaServed,knowsAbout. - Flag fabricated/invalid data (e.g. an Event with a made-up
startDate).
Step 4 — On-page structure (sample the top pages)
For each sampled page, does it have:
- An answer-first summary in the first screen (40–70 words)?
- Question-styled headings?
- Sourced statistics?
- An FAQ section emitting FAQPage JSON-LD?
- Visible EEAT (author, credentials, primary sources) and an updated date?
Step 5 — Off-site & entity (report, don't fix)
- Wikidata/Wikipedia entity present? Google Business Profile (for local)? Branded mentions in local/niche press? YouTube presence?
- Search the brand name unscoped in an AI engine's own search tool (Claude's WebSearch, standard mode). If an aggregator (Eventbrite, Meetup, a directory) takes the results instead of the homepage, the engine doesn't know the brand.
Step 6 — Each engine's view (if time allows)
Whether agents find, open and cite the site depends on their own search index, not Google's. Check it directly with Claude's WebSearch tool:
allowed_domains: ["TARGET"]with a broad word → indexed at all?- 3–5 terms where the site is top 10 on Google, unscoped → does it rank there?
- The same terms in
extendedmode → a ranking-depth problem? Agents almost always usestandard.
"Indexed but never ranks" is an entity/authority gap, not a content gap. For a
full measurement, use the geo-fanout skill.
Output — the gap report
Rank findings by leverage, not order found:
- Blockers (crawler 403s, client-only rendering) — nothing else matters until fixed.
- High (missing schema, no answer-first structure, sitemap gaps, no IndexNow/Bing, brand unknown to an engine's index).
- Medium (EEAT, freshness, OG, entity signals).
- Explicitly skip — call out any
llms.txt/speakable/mass-thin-page work as folklore (no engine consumes llms.txt; page count barely correlates with AI visibility). Don't recommend them.
For each finding: what, where (path/URL), the fix, and the expected impact. If
geo-kit's playbook/ is available, cite the relevant section; otherwise the
rules above are self-sufficient.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

