replica-test
Skill1 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub
Test an app clone for bugs: a test plan from the recon flows with happy paths and edge cases (Cyrillic input, time zones, double submit, a second user's data), Playwright end-to-end specs, a click-through for the rest, and bug reports by severity until no S1 or S2 is open. Use for 'test my clone', 'find bugs', 'QA this', 'write e2e tests'; RU: протестируй, найди баги, тесты, проверь приложение.
- Installs packages
2 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- realtahailyas/reverse-engineer-app-skillsedited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- Jakeschincariol/replica-skilledited, first seen Oct 3, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- Jakeschincariol/replica-skill★ 39918% same
- realtahailyas/reverse-engineer-app-skills★ 318% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- replica-architectSkill
- replica-backendSkill
- replica-brandSkill
- replica-buildSkill
- replica-deploySkill
- replica-designSkill
- replica-diffSkill
- replica-launchSkill
- replica-reconSkill
- replica-usersSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Test your clone, never the original: No load testing, fuzzing or scripting against the original's servers.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
replica-test
Reads the flows in replica/recon.md. Writes replica/test-plan.md, replica/bugs.md and specs in
e2e/ (templates in this folder).
The rule
Test your clone, never the original. No load testing, fuzzing or scripting against the original's servers. Using it by hand to see how it behaves is fine.
Step 1: the plan
For every flow: the happy path; the edge cases that apply (empty input, very long input, emoji, Cyrillic and accents, two tabs, double submit, back and refresh mid-flow, slow network, offline, expired session, a second user's data must be invisible, time zones and daylight saving, 390px, keyboard only, screen reader labels); the negative cases (wrong password, payment declined with the provider's test card, permission denied, deleted record). Number them: F01-H1, F01-E3, F01-N2.
Step 2: automate
Playwright, one spec per flow, against the local dev server with seed data, selectors by role and label. Every spec fails on console errors and on any 5xx, and runs an axe accessibility scan on each screen.
npm i -D @playwright/test @axe-core/playwright && npx playwright install chromium
npx playwright testStep 3: click through the rest
Emails arriving, real OAuth, payments end to end, visual glitches: a manual pass, with a browser tool on the local clone if one is available, screenshots per step, or a checklist for the user.
Step 4: bugs
bugs.md in the bug-report.md format. S1 data loss, security, payments, core flow blocked; S2
broken without a workaround; S3 with a workaround or visibly wrong; S4 cosmetic. Only what you
reproduced; "might be" goes to a separate list.
Step 5: fix loop
S1 and S2 first. Failing test, fix, pass, keep the test, re-run the suite. Ship nothing with an open S1. Next: /replica-diff.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

