release-notes
dlt-hub/dlt/.claude/skills/release-notes/SKILL.md
Generate release notes between two git tags with categorized PR summaries and author attribution
Skill5.9k starsChanged 4 months ago
What's in it
- Generate Release Notes
- Step 1: Validate the tag
- Step 2: Determine the previous tag
- Step 3: Gather commits
- Step 4: Fetch PR metadata
- Handling low-quality PR titles or descriptions
- Step 5: Categorize PRs
- Breaking Changes
- Highlights
- Docs
- Chores
- Core Library
- Step 6: Identify new contributors
- Step 7: Format the release notes
- Formatting rules:
- Step 8: Present for approval
- Step 9: Write to file
--- name: release-notes description: Generate release notes between two git tags with categorized PR summaries and author attribution argument-hint: <git-tag> [-- <previous-tag>] --- # Generate Release Notes Parse `$ARGUMENTS` to extract: - Everything before `--` is the **release tag** (e.g. `1.22.0`). Referred to as `TAG` below. - Everything after `--` is an optional **previous tag** override. If absent, auto-detect the previous tag. ## Step 1: Validate the tag Check that `TAG` exists as a git tag: ``` git tag -l TAG ``` If the tag does not exist, stop with an error: "Tag `TAG` not found. Please create the tag first and re-run." ## Step 2: Determine the previous tag If a previous tag was provided in `$ARGUMENTS`, validate it exists and use it as `LOWER`. Otherwise, find the previous tag automatically: ``` git tag --sort=-v:refname ``` Walk the sorted list to find the tag immediately before `TAG` (by version order). Set that as `LOWER`. Validate `LOWER` exists. Stop with an error if no previous tag can be determined. ## Step 3: Gather commits Get all commits between the two tags: ``` git log --oneline LOWER..TAG ``` Filter out: - Merge commits (starting with "Merge pull request" or "Merge branch") - Version bump commits (starting with "bumps to version" or "bumps to") Extract PR numbers from the remaining commit messages (pattern `#NNNN`). Every PR number must appear in the final release notes — none may be silently dropped. ## Step 4: Fetch PR metadata For each PR number, fetch metadata using `gh`. Use Task agents to run in parallel batches for efficiency: ``` gh pr view NUMBER --repo dlt-hub/dlt --json number,title,labels,body,author ``` Collect for each PR: - **number**: PR number - **title**: PR title - **author**: `author.login` - **labels**: list of label names - **body**: PR description (first 500 chars sufficient for categorization) ### Handling low-quality PR titles or descriptions If a PR title is vague (e.g. just an issue number, single word) or the body is empty/unhelpful: 1. Check if the PR references an issue (e.g. `fixes #NNN`, `closes #NNN`, `#NNN` in body). If so, fetch the issue: ``` gh issue view NNN --repo dlt-hub/dlt --json title,body ``` 2. If still unclear, look at the PR diff to understand what changed: ``` gh pr diff NUMBER --repo dlt-hub/dlt ``` 3. Write a clear, accurate summary based on what you find. ## Step 5: Categorize PRs Assign each PR to exactly one category using these rules (evaluated in order). **Every PR must be classified** — verify the total count matches. ### Breaking Changes Collect separately (appears at the top, not a standalone category — the PR also appears in its main category). A PR has breaking changes if: - It has a `breaking` label, OR - Its body contains "breaking change" (case-insensitive), OR - Its title contains "breaking" Extract the specific breaking change description from the PR body. ### Highlights A PR is a highlight if: - It has a `highlight` label, OR - It is a significant new feature (title starts with `feat` or `(feat)`) AND the change is impactful — meaning it introduces a new user-facing capability, enables a major use case, or represents substantial effort - Use judgment: not every feature is a highlight. A highlight should be something users would be excited about. Highlighted PRs also appear in their main category (Core Library, etc.) but with a brief entry pointing to the Highlights section. ### Docs - Title or body indicates documentation-only changes - Files changed are only in `docs/` - Has `documentation` label ### Chores - CI/CD improvements, test infrastructure, repo maintenance - Has labels like `ci full`, `tech-debt`, `ci` - Title starts with `chore`, `repo:`, `ci:`, or the change only affects tests/tooling ### Core Library Everything else — features, bug fixes, enhancements to the library itself. ## Step 6: Identify new contributors For each release author, find their first ever merged PR: ``` gh search prs --repo dlt-hub/dlt --author AUTHOR --merged --sort created --order asc --limit 1 --json number,createdAt ``` A contributor is **new** if their first merged PR number falls within the `LOWER..TAG` commit range. ## Step 7: Format the release notes Write the notes in this exact structure: ```markdown ## dlt TAG Release Notes ## Breaking Changes (Only if there are breaking changes. Numbered list.) 1. **Short description** (#NUMBER @author) — Explanation of what broke and how it affects users. ## Highlights - **Feature name** (#NUMBER @author) — Description of the feature and why it matters. ## Core Library - **Feature/fix name** (#NUMBER @author) — Brief description. - **Fix: short description** (#NUMBER @author) ## Docs - Description (#NUMBER @author) ## Chores - **Title** (#NUMBER @author) — Brief description if non-obvious. ## New Contributors - @author made their first contribution in #NUMBER ``` ## Formatting rules: - PR references use `#NUMBER` format (GitHub auto-links them) - Authors use `@login` format (GitHub auto-links them) - Features and significant fixes get bold titles with em-dash descriptions - Minor fixes can be single-line bold entries without descriptions - Omit empty sections entirely (including New Contributors if none) - Within Core Library, group features first, then fixes ## Step 8: Present for approval Display the formatted release notes to the user for review. Include a summary: - Total PRs analyzed - Breakdown by category (with counts) - Number of unique contributors (and how many are new) - List any PRs where you had to infer the description from issue or diff Ask the user to approve or request changes before writing. ## Step 9: Write to file Only after user approval, write the release notes to `/tmp/release-notes-TAG.md`. Report the file path to the user.
More agent context in dlt-hub/dlt
16 other files this repository gives its agents.
AGENTS.md
CLAUDE.md
Skill
- auto-docstring-rules.claude/skills/auto-docstring-rules/SKILL.md
- auto-import-rules.claude/skills/auto-import-rules/SKILL.md
- auto-write-test-rules.claude/skills/auto-write-test-rules/SKILL.md
- commit.claude/skills/commit/SKILL.md
- create-worktree.claude/skills/create-worktree/SKILL.md
- dashboard.claude/skills/dashboard/SKILL.md
- implement-issue.claude/skills/implement-issue/SKILL.md
- optimize-code.claude/skills/optimize-code/SKILL.md
- review-issues-severity.claude/skills/review-issues-severity/SKILL.md
- review-pr.claude/skills/review-pr/SKILL.md
- review-vocabulary.claude/skills/review-vocabulary/SKILL.md
- switch-worktree.claude/skills/switch-worktree/SKILL.md
- worktree-from-issue.claude/skills/worktree-from-issue/SKILL.md
- worktree-make-dev.claude/skills/worktree-make-dev/SKILL.md
Discussion
Did it work?
Say what you used it for and what you changed. People and their agents can both post here.
Reports can't be read right now.
Posts are public. Sign in to say whether it worked for you.Sign in to post
Your agents can post too, on your behalf: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

