agentleFS
dkpapadopoulosdkpapadopoulos/auto-claude-skills/skills/prototype-lab/SKILL.md

prototype-lab

Skill6 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub

Produce 3 thin comparable variants of a proposed design with a comparison artifact and mandatory Human Validation Plan

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Default: 3 variants. User can override ("just compare these 2").

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    Create the minimum artifacts defined in Step 1

    line 35
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep each variant thin — enough to evaluate the approach, not production-ready

    line 36

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Prototype Lab

Build exactly 3 thin, comparable variants of a proposed design so the user can evaluate concrete alternatives before committing to a direction.

When to Use

During DESIGN phase when competing approaches are identified. Fires on trigger match alongside brainstorming (which remains the process driver). The user or DESIGN phase guidance may suggest prototyping; this skill does not depend on brainstorming internally escalating to it.

Relationship to design-debate:

  • design-debate reasons about options (3 agents argue)
  • prototype-lab builds comparable artifacts (3 thin variants)
  • They are complementary. design-debate can precede prototype-lab.

Step 1: Identify Variant Scope

Determine what "a variant" means for this project:

Project typeVariant contents
New skillSKILL.md draft + routing entry + one behavioral test
New hookScript draft + config entry + one syntax test
New featureImplementation sketch + one test
Architecture decisionThin proof-of-concept code + one integration test

Default: 3 variants. User can override ("just compare these 2").

Step 2: Build Variants

For each variant (A, B, C):

  1. Create the minimum artifacts defined in Step 1
  2. Keep each variant thin — enough to evaluate the approach, not production-ready
  3. Label clearly: Variant A, Variant B, Variant C
  4. Note key trade-offs for each

Step 3: Write Comparison Artifact

Save to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-prototype-lab.md:

# Prototype Comparison: <Topic>

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Variants:** 3

## Variant A: <Name>
**Approach:** <1-2 sentences>
**Trade-offs:** <pros and cons>
**Artifact:** <path or inline>

## Variant B: <Name>
**Approach:** <1-2 sentences>
**Trade-offs:** <pros and cons>
**Artifact:** <path or inline>

## Variant C: <Name>
**Approach:** <1-2 sentences>
**Trade-offs:** <pros and cons>
**Artifact:** <path or inline>

## Recommendation
**Chosen:** Variant <X>
**Reasoning:** <why this over the others>

## Human Validation Plan
<REQUIRED — how the user will test the chosen option with real usage>
<AI-simulated testing may inform the draft but never replaces this section>
<Describe: who tests, what they test, what success looks like>

## Success Signals
<What to measure after shipping to confirm the choice was right>

Step 4: Present to User

Show the comparison artifact. Ask the user to choose a variant. Only the chosen variant proceeds to writing-plans. The others are archived in the comparison artifact.

Constraints

  • 3 variants is the default
  • Human Validation Plan is mandatory — the skill must not proceed without it
  • AI-simulated user testing may inform the draft but never replaces real-user validation
  • For auto-claude-skills, "prototype" means repo-native artifacts (SKILL.md, bash scripts, routing config, tests)
  • Variants are disposable — only the chosen variant survives

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.