agentleFS
diz5diz5/agentic-workflow-toolkit/.claude/skills/application-prep/SKILL.md

application-prep

Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Prep job applications from the ranked scoreboard. Use when the user says "apply to X", "queue up applications", "auto-apply" (legacy name), "draft the answers for X", "fill the form for X", or wants to see which roles to apply to next. Picks roles off job-scoreboard.md, scaffolds a per-job packet, and drafts a review-ready answer sheet you use to fill and submit the ATS form yourself. No automated form-filling or submission — you apply manually.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run apply.py queue. Relay the short list (rank, company, role, 推荐分, 一句话).

    line 53
  2. Very specific:

    After they apply, record it: scoreboard.py status … --set "已投 <MM-DD>" and — if the role came through the LinkedIn ledger — seen.py mark …

    line 78

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Application Prep (formerly auto-apply)

Turn ranked roles into filed applications, keeping the same split as the rest of this repo: LLM does judgment (drafting answers), code does mechanics (apply.py: queue, packet scaffold). Personal data lives only under applications/ (gitignored).

Load profile.local.md for the candidate; application-kit.md for reusable answers. Both are gitignored (the repo ships profile.example.md / identity.example.json as templates).

Step 0 — Sourcing (see the linkedin-sourcing skill)

Finding the roles to apply to is its own workflow, owned by the linkedin-sourcing skill: it sources by criteria via anonymous LinkedIn guest search (server-side, no account risk), the seen.py jobId ledger dedups across daily runs, survivors are analyzed (⭐, location-aware) and the

6 list is presented with an apply link. (ATS-board sweeps are the job-sourcer agent; both feed the analysis flow.)

Roles the candidate then wants to apply to move into the packet flow below.

Data model — one folder per job (all gitignored)

applications/<slug>/
├── packet.json    # machine record: identity + questions[{label,answer,...}] + ats/url + state
├── answers.md     # human-readable answer sheet — the review surface (the deliverable)
└── run.log        # append-only pipeline log
applications/identity.json   # shared applicant identity (copy from identity.example.json), gitignored

slug = kebab(company + role). A posting's identity is company + role (same as the scoreboard), so one company's multiple roles get separate packets.

Apply-state (mirrors the scoreboard 状态 column, extended)

未投 → 排队中 → 草稿就绪 → 已投 MM-DD

  • The board is single-writer through scoreboard.py — never hand-edit it. When a job moves state, update the board with python3 .claude/skills/analyze-job/scoreboard.py status --company C --role R --set "<state>".
  • The packet's own state field is updated by apply.py as it progresses.

The mechanical CLI — apply.py

python3 .claude/skills/application-prep/apply.py <op>:

  • queue [--min-score N] [--status S] [--json] — roles to apply to, ranked (default: 状态=未投, 推荐分≥6).
  • init --company C --role R [--url U] [--ats A] [--location L] — scaffold the packet (seeds identity from applications/identity.json).
  • list [--json] — all packets, their state and answered-question count. Show only its one-line stdout — do not paste packet/board contents into chat.

Flow

Step 1 — Pick what to apply to

Run apply.py queue. Relay the short list (rank, company, role, 推荐分, 一句话). Ask the user which to prep (or "top N"). Only roles already analyzed (on the board) can be queued — if the user names an un-analyzed company, run the analyze-job skill first.

Step 2 — Scaffold the packet

For each chosen role: apply.py init --company … --role … --url … --ats …. Then set the board state: scoreboard.py status … --set 排队中.

Step 3 — Draft the answers (subagent)

Spawn one application-drafter subagent per job (in parallel for several). Give it the packet slug, the job's analysis file (job-analyses/<Company>.md), and the form URL (or a pre-scraped question list). It scrapes/uses the questions, drafts short human answers per the Mode B rules, and writes answers.md + fills packet.json. Relay its summary — including any needs_confirm questions the candidate must answer. Then set board state → 草稿就绪.

Step 4 — Review

Show the user answers.md (this is the review surface — the answers, not the board). Once the candidate approves / edits, check apply.py list shows every question answered; resolve any needs_confirm items before proceeding. Board state stays 草稿就绪.

Step 5 — Apply manually (no automated autofill/submit — by design)

The tool intentionally does not fill or submit forms for the candidate — we run no browser automation on their behalf. The pipeline ends with a review-ready answer sheet:

  • Deliver answers.md (the answers) + the ATS URL.
  • The candidate fills the ATS form themselves (copying from the sheet) and clicks Submit.
  • After they apply, record it: scoreboard.py status … --set "已投 <MM-DD>" and — if the role came through the LinkedIn ledger — seen.py mark --job-id … --status applied.

(An autofill/submit driver — and its payload.json fill spec — was considered and dropped to avoid browser automation; every application is submitted by the candidate.)

Rules

  • Never fabricate identity or experience. Answers come from profile.local.md + application-kit.md; identity from applications/identity.json. Missing data → flag it (needs_confirm), ask the candidate, never invent.
  • Never submit for the candidate. The tool never fills or submits an application — the candidate does that themselves. We prepare the answers only.
  • Don't dump packet/board contents into chat. answers.md is the review surface — show that. Board changes go through scoreboard.py (one-line output only).
  • Privacy: everything under applications/ is gitignored; run python3 publish_guard.py before any commit/push. The repo only ships generic templates.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.