agentleFS
divysharma-codedivysharma-code/Skills/the-humanizer/SKILL.md

the-humanizer

Skill1 starsChanged 21 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Review any written content (blog posts, LinkedIn posts, emails, Slack messages) for AI-generated patterns, auto-detect the content type, score it, and rewrite it in an authentic human voice. Use this skill whenever the user wants to: review or edit any draft for AI texture, humanize AI-generated writing, detect AI patterns in content, rewrite content to sound more natural or authentic, check if writing "sounds like AI", improve the voice or tone of any written content, score writing for originality or authenticity, or remove AI-sounding language. Also trigger when the user mentions "humanize", "AI detection", "sounds like AI", "make it sound human", "voice check", "blog review", "rewrite in my voice", "LinkedIn post review", "email review", "does this sound like AI" — even if they don't explicitly mention this skill by name. Auto-detects content type (blog, LinkedIn, email, Slack) and applies channel-specific rules automatically.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

42 rules. About 0 are common, 40 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈40

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.