commit-message-storyteller
Skill1 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Analyzes git diffs or staged changes and generates narrative commit messages that explain WHY a change was made, not just what changed — following Conventional Commits format. Use when asked to "write a commit message", "describe my changes", "what should I commit this as", or "summarize my diff". Works with git diff output, staged files, or plain descriptions of changes. Does not run git commit; to stage files and make the commit, use the git-commit skill.
1 other project uses a version of this; 1 new project in the last 4 weeks, against 0 the 4 before.
Adopted by
Surging: 1 new project took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data
Most recently taken up by
- github/awesome-copilotword for word, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41k100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- karpathy-guidelinesSkill
- refactoring-englishSkill
- security-auditSkill
- simple-englishSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 30
Ask the user (or infer from the diff) for:
- Distinctive: line 36
If the user provides a raw git diff, extract this context automatically from the diff.
- Distinctive: line 74
Use imperative mood: "add", "fix", "remove" — not "added" or "fixes"
- Distinctive: line 76
No period at the end
- Distinctive: line 84
Keep lines under 100 characters
- Distinctive: line 117
If the diff contains logically separate changes, split them into multiple commit messages and tell the user.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Commit Message Storyteller
Transforms raw git diffs and change descriptions into clear, story-driven commit messages that follow the Conventional Commits specification. Instead of "update file.js", you get messages that communicate intent, context, and impact.
When to Use This Skill
- User says "write a commit message"
- User pastes a git diff or describes code changes
- User says "what should I commit this as?" or "summarize my diff"
- User wants better commit history for their team or open-source project
- User is preparing a pull request and wants meaningful commit messages
Prerequisites
Have at least one of the following ready:
- Output from
git difforgit diff --staged - A description of what you changed and why
- A list of modified files
How It Works
Step 1: Gather the Change Context
Ask the user (or infer from the diff) for:
- What changed — files, functions, logic affected
- Why it changed — bug fix, new feature, refactor, performance, etc.
- Who/what triggered it — issue number, user request, tech debt, etc.
If the user provides a raw git diff, extract this context automatically from the diff.
Step 2: Identify the Commit Type
Map the change to a Conventional Commits type using this guide:
| Type | Use When |
feat | A new feature or capability is added |
fix | A bug or incorrect behavior is corrected |
refactor | Code restructured without changing behavior |
perf | A change that improves performance |
docs | Documentation only changes |
style | Formatting, whitespace, missing semicolons (no logic change) |
test | Adding or updating tests |
build | Build system or dependency changes |
chore | Other maintenance that does not change source or tests |
ci | CI/CD pipeline changes |
revert | Reverting a previous commit |
See references/conventional-commits-guide.md for detailed examples.
Step 3: Write the Commit Message
Follow this structure:
<type>(<optional scope>): <short imperative summary>
<body — the story: why this change was made, what problem it solves>
<footer — issue refs, breaking change notices>Rules for Each Part
Subject line (first line):
- Use imperative mood: "add", "fix", "remove" — not "added" or "fixes"
- Max 72 characters
- No period at the end
- Lowercase after the colon
Body (the story):
- Explain the why, not the what (the diff already shows the what)
- Describe the problem that existed before this change
- Mention any alternatives considered if relevant
- Keep lines under 100 characters
- Separate from subject with a blank line
Footer:
- Reference issues:
Closes #123,Fixes #456,Refs #789 - Mark breaking changes:
BREAKING CHANGE: <description>
Step 4: Generate Output
Produce the commit message in a copyable code block, followed by a one-line plain-English explanation of the story you told.
Example output:
fix(auth): prevent token refresh loop on expired sessions
When a user's session expired mid-request, the auth middleware was
triggering a token refresh, which itself failed validation and triggered
another refresh — causing an infinite retry loop that crashed the app.
This adds a recursion guard flag that aborts the refresh cycle if a
refresh is already in progress, returning a clean 401 instead.
Closes #312Story told: A silent infinite loop on session expiry was crashing the app; this stops the cycle early and returns a clean error.
Multiple Commits from One Diff
If the diff contains logically separate changes, split them into multiple commit messages and tell the user. Use this heuristic:
- Different files with unrelated purposes → likely separate commits
- Same file but distinct concerns (e.g., bug fix + refactor) → suggest splitting
- Everything tightly coupled → one commit is fine
Edge Cases
| Situation | How to Handle |
| User provides no context beyond a diff | Infer type and scope from file names and changed symbols |
| Changes span many files with no clear theme | Ask: "Is this one logical change, or multiple?" |
| Breaking change detected | Add BREAKING CHANGE: footer automatically |
| User says "keep it short" | Omit body, just write a strong subject line |
| No issue number available | Omit the footer entirely |
Quick Reference
# Get your staged diff to paste into Copilot
git diff --staged
# Or get the last uncommitted working tree changes
git diffSee references/conventional-commits-guide.md for type examples and scope guidelines.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

