agentleFS
dimsdealldimsdeall/craftwhale/AGENTS.md

craftwhale

AGENTS.md0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Collection 30 Agent Skills + 8 Commands — 6 CORE (Spec → Ship) + 2 OPTIONAL. Contract: /constraints (once, optional) → /spec → prd.md (WHAT/WHY) → /plan → implementation-plan.md (HOW) + tasks/plan.md (ORDER) → /build → code.

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Verify (6): debugging-and-error-recovery, browser-testing-with-devtools, webapp-testing (optional — web only, Playwright + with_server.py, …

    line 10
  2. Very specific:

    After adding/editing a skill → test: npx skills add dimsdeall/craftwhale --list should show (Found 30 skills).

    line 23
  3. Very specific:

    Don't know what to build / rough idea → brainstorming first, then interview-me / idea-refine

    line 27

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md — craftwhale (dimsdeall)

Collection 30 Agent Skills + 8 Commands — 6 CORE (Spec → Ship) + 2 OPTIONAL. Contract: /constraints (once, optional) → /spec → prd.md (WHAT/WHY) → /plan → implementation-plan.md (HOW) + tasks/plan.md (ORDER) → /build → code.

Inventory (do not delete — source of truth)

  • Define (5): brainstorming, interview-me, idea-refine, spec-driven-development, constraint-driven-development
  • Plan (3): planning-and-task-breakdown, context-engineering, using-agent-skills
  • Build (5): incremental-implementation, test-driven-development, api-and-interface-design, frontend-ui-engineering, source-driven-development
  • Verify (6): debugging-and-error-recovery, browser-testing-with-devtools, webapp-testing (optional — web only, Playwright + with_server.py, Anthropic), security-and-hardening, performance-optimization, doubt-driven-development
  • Review (4): code-review-and-quality, code-simplification, documentation-and-adrs, deprecation-and-migration
  • Ship & Operate (4): git-workflow-and-versioning, ci-cd-and-automation, shipping-and-launch, observability-and-instrumentation
  • Explain (3, optional — read-only): improve-codebase-architecture (mattpocock/skills), database-schema-designer (softaworks/agent-toolkit), write-feature-docs (warpdotdev/common-skills)
  • Shared references/: 7 checklists (accessibility, definition-of-done, observability, orchestration, performance, security, testing)
  • Commands commands/*.toml (8): CORE 6 /spec → brainstorming+idea-refine+interview-me+spec-driven → prd.md (WHAT/WHY, 8-section PRD), /plan → planning+context+api/database → implementation-plan.md (HOW, 5-layer Mermaid + DB ERD + API + frontend) + tasks/plan.md (ORDER, vertical slices), /build → incremental+TDD, /verify → debugging+security/perf/doubt+webapp-testing (web optional — skip if not web), /review → code-review+code-simplification+ADRs, /ship → shipping+CI/CD+observability+git — OPTIONAL 2 /constraints → constraint-driven (interview 4Q → CONSTRAINTS.md), /explain-code → improve-codebase-architecture+database-schema-designer+write-feature-docs (a/b/c, read-only)

Rules for AI agents working on this repo

  • Each skill = skills/<name>/SKILL.md with valid name + description frontmatter. name must equal folder name (lowercase, hyphen).
  • brainstorming is the first gate before any other skill — classifies Spike/Bounded/Architectural + hard-gate approval before coding. Do not skip.
  • Shared checklists in references/ — reference via relative path from the skill.
  • New skill: duplicate the nearest skill as template → edit frontmatter → push.
  • After adding/editing a skill → test: npx skills add dimsdeall/craftwhale --list should show (Found 30 skills).

Intent → Skill Mapping (for agents using this repo via npx skills add dimsdeall/craftwhale)

  • Don't know what to build / rough idea → brainstorming first, then interview-me / idea-refine
  • Want a spec/PRD → spec-driven-development
  • Have a spec, want to break it into tasks → planning-and-task-breakdown
  • Need repo context → context-engineering / source-driven-development
  • Writing code → incremental-implementation + test-driven-development (+ api-and-interface-design / frontend-ui-engineering if relevant)
  • Web verification (optional — only for webapp/UI) → webapp-testing (Playwright + with_server.py) or browser-testing-with-devtools — skip if not web
  • Bug / error → debugging-and-error-recovery (+ doubt-driven-development if high stakes)
  • Review → code-review-and-quality → code-simplification if needed
  • Commit/PR → git-workflow-and-versioning
  • CI/CD, release, monitoring → ci-cd-and-automation, shipping-and-launch, observability-and-instrumentation
  • Want to explain architecture/schema/feature (read-only) → /explain-code → improve-codebase-architecture / database-schema-designer / write-feature-docs
  • Want a quality bar → /constraints → constraint-driven-development

Provenance

  • 1 skill brainstorming from obra/superpowers (MIT, S-rank)
  • 1 skill improve-codebase-architecture from mattpocock/skills (MIT, 915K)
  • 1 skill database-schema-designer from softaworks/agent-toolkit (MIT)
  • 1 skill write-feature-docs from warpdotdev/common-skills (MIT)
  • 1 skill webapp-testing from anthropics/skills (MIT, Playwright + with_server.py)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.