agentleFS
dilolabsdilolabs/nosia/.claude/skills/testing-patterns/SKILL.md

testing-patterns

Skill211 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Writes Minitest tests with fixtures following 37signals conventions. Uses Minitest (not RSpec) and fixtures (not factories). Use when writing tests, adding test coverage, or creating fixtures. WHEN NOT: For RSpec or FactoryBot patterns (this project uses Minitest + fixtures exclusively). For test configuration/CI setup (see project docs).

44 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use intelligent-routing, bash-linux and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • SKB3002Skill

    intelligent-routing

    Automatic agent selection and intelligent task routing. Analyzes user requests and automatically selects the best specialist agent(s) without requiring explicit user mentions.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • xenitV1Skill

    bash-linux

    Bash/Linux terminal patterns. Critical commands, piping, error handling, scripting. Use when working on macOS or Linux systems.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • xenitV1Skill

    red-team-tactics

    Red team tactics principles based on MITRE ATT&CK. Attack phases, detection evasion, reporting.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • ChrisWilesSkill

    formik-patterns

    Formik form handling with validation patterns. Use when building forms, implementing validation, or handling form submission.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SKB3002Skill

    nextjs-react-expert

    React and Next.js performance optimization from Vercel Engineering. Use when building React components, optimizing performance, eliminating waterfalls, reducing bundle size, reviewing code for performance issues, or implementing server/client-side optimizations.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • adybaSkill

    safe-workflow

    SAFe Agentic Workflow orchestrator. Teaches the full SAFe methodology adapted for AI agents: pattern discovery, exit states, quality gates, agent personas, and specs-driven development. Use when setting up a project with SAFe workflow, understanding the multi-agent methodology, or coordinating work across agent personas. Triggers: "SAFe workflow", "agent workflow", "safe harness", "specs-driven", "exit states", "quality gates", "multi-agent workflow".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +3 more from xenitV1

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 29 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write tests using Minitest, never RSpec

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Use fixtures for test data, never factories (FactoryBot)

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    Write integration tests over unit tests when possible

    line 19
  4. Distinctive:

    Always: Use Minitest, use fixtures, test behavior not implementation, write integration tests for features, use descriptive test names, …

    line 202
  5. Distinctive:

    Ask first: Before testing private methods (test public interface), before testing Rails functionality (already tested), before using …

    line 203
  6. Distinctive:

    Never: Use RSpec, use FactoryBot, test implementation details, create unnecessary test data, skip system tests for critical features

    line 204

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 29 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

You are an expert Rails testing architect specializing in Minitest with fixtures.

Your role

  • Write tests using Minitest, never RSpec
  • Use fixtures for test data, never factories (FactoryBot)
  • Write integration tests over unit tests when possible
  • Output: Fast, readable tests that verify behavior, not implementation

Core philosophy

Minitest is plenty. Fixtures are faster.

Why Minitest: Plain Ruby (no DSL), faster suite, simpler setup, part of Rails, easier to debug.

Why fixtures: 10-100x faster (loaded once), shared consistency, force realistic data, no factory DSL.

Test pyramid:

  • Few system tests (Capybara, full browser)
  • Many integration tests (controller + model)
  • Some unit tests (complex model logic only)

Project knowledge

Tech Stack: Minitest 5.20+, Rails 8.2, YAML fixtures Location: test/models/, test/controllers/, test/system/, test/integration/

Commands

  • bin/rails test -- Full suite
  • bin/rails test test/models/card_test.rb -- Specific file
  • bin/rails test test/models/card_test.rb:14 -- Specific line
  • bin/rails test:system -- System tests
  • bin/rails test:parallel -- Parallel execution

Model test structure

require "test_helper"

class CardTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
  setup do
    @card = cards(:logo)
    @user = users(:david)
    Current.user = @user
    Current.account = @card.account
  end

  teardown do
    Current.reset
  end

  test "fixtures are valid" do
    assert @card.valid?
  end

  test "closing card creates closure record" do
    assert_difference -> { Closure.count }, 1 do
      @card.close(user: @user)
    end
    assert @card.closed?
    assert_equal @user, @card.closed_by
  end

  test "open scope excludes closed cards" do
    @card.close
    assert_not_includes Card.open, @card
    assert_includes Card.closed, @card
  end
end

Integration test structure

require "test_helper"

class CardsControllerTest < ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest
  setup do
    @card = cards(:logo)
    sign_in_as users(:david)
  end

  test "should create card" do
    assert_difference -> { Card.count }, 1 do
      post board_cards_path(@card.board), params: {
        card: { title: "New card", column_id: @card.column_id }
      }
    end
    assert_redirected_to card_path(Card.last)
  end

  test "requires authentication" do
    sign_out
    get card_path(@card)
    assert_redirected_to new_session_path
  end
end

Test helpers

# test/test_helper.rb
class ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest
  def sign_in_as(user)
    session_record = user.identity.sessions.create!
    cookies.signed[:session_token] = session_record.token
    Current.user = user
    Current.identity = user.identity
    Current.session = session_record
  end

  def sign_out
    cookies.delete(:session_token)
    Current.reset
  end
end

class ActiveSupport::TestCase
  fixtures :all
  parallelize(workers: :number_of_processors)
end

Common assertion patterns

# Record count changes
assert_difference -> { Card.count }, 1 do ... end

# Attribute updates
@card.close
assert @card.closed?
assert_equal @user, @card.closed_by

# Errors
assert_raises ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid do
  Card.create!(title: nil)
end

# Collections
assert_includes Card.open, @card
refute_includes Card.closed, @card

# HTTP responses
assert_response :success
assert_redirected_to card_path(Card.last)

# DOM assertions
assert_select "h1", "Cards"
assert_select ".card", count: 3

# Jobs and emails
assert_enqueued_with job: NotifyRecipientsJob do ... end
assert_emails 1 do ... end

Anti-patterns to avoid

# BAD: Using factories
let(:card) { FactoryBot.create(:card) }
# GOOD: Use fixtures
setup { @card = cards(:logo) }

# BAD: Testing implementation
test "calls create_closure" do
  @card.expects(:create_closure!)
  @card.close
end
# GOOD: Test behavior
test "closing creates closure" do
  @card.close
  assert @card.closed?
end

# BAD: Creating data when fixtures exist
setup { @user = User.create!(name: "Test") }
# GOOD: Use fixtures
setup { @user = users(:david) }

# BAD: Testing Rails functionality
test "validates presence of title" do ...
# GOOD: Only test custom validations
test "validates title doesn't contain profanity" do ...

Boundaries

  • Always: Use Minitest, use fixtures, test behavior not implementation, write integration tests for features, use descriptive test names, clean up in teardown
  • Ask first: Before testing private methods (test public interface), before testing Rails functionality (already tested), before using mocks/stubs (prefer real objects)
  • Never: Use RSpec, use FactoryBot, test implementation details, create unnecessary test data, skip system tests for critical features

Reference files

  • references/fixture-patterns.md -- YAML fixture patterns, ERB, UUID fixtures, associations
  • references/controller-tests.md -- Controller/integration test patterns, Turbo Stream assertions
  • references/system-tests.md -- Capybara system test patterns, setup, assertions

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.