agentleFS
dfrysingerdfrysinger/qrspi-plus/skills/using-qrspi/SKILL.md

using-qrspi

Skill37 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when starting any conversation — establishes the QRSPI pipeline for agentic software development, requiring structured progression through Goals, Questions, Research, Design, Phasing, Structure, Plan, Parallelize, Implement, Integrate, Test, with Replan firing between phases

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 13 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 13

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill entirely.

    line 7
  2. Very specific:

    Read skills/using-qrspi/references/workspace-layout.md when setting up a new run's on-disk layout or auditing an existing one — …

    line 14
  3. Very specific:

    Read skills/using-qrspi/references/pipeline-overview.md when you need the full pipeline shape — both diagrams (full + quick-fix) and the …

    line 18
  4. Very specific:

    Read skills/using-qrspi/references/route-templates.md when Goals is seeding config.md.route at run start, or when the user requests a …

    line 22
  5. Very specific:

    Read skills/using-qrspi/references/artifact-directory.md when creating the artifact directory for a new run, or when resolving the slug for …

    line 26
  6. Very specific:

    Read skills/using-qrspi/references/approval-markers.md when transitioning a step to status: approved (or replan-draft), or before the …

    line 43
  7. Very specific:

    Read skills/using-qrspi/references/state-and-pipeline-ordering.md before dispatching a downstream step when checking predecessor-approval …

    line 49
  8. Very specific:

    Read skills/using-qrspi/references/backward-loops.md when a downstream step surfaces new learnings about an upstream artifact — …

    line 57
  9. Very specific:

    Read skills/using-qrspi/references/mid-pipeline-entry.md when resuming a run partway through the pipeline (artifact directory already …

    line 63
  10. Very specific:

    Read skills/using-qrspi/references/pipeline-progress.md when unsure where the run currently sits in the pipeline — diagnostic for resolving …

    line 67
  11. Very specific:

    Every artifact-producing step runs the Standard Review Loop.

    line 79
  12. Very specific:

    Read skills/using-qrspi/references/review-loop-pause-gate.md when the review loop hits the pause gate (review-round kept-findings non-zero, …

    line 90
  13. Very specific:

    Read skills/using-qrspi/references/compaction-checkpoints-detail.md when approaching a context-saturation checkpoint and unsure which …

    line 98
  14. Very specific:

    Read skills/using-qrspi/references/feedback-file-format.md when writing or consuming a feedback file after a rejection round in Plan, …

    line 102

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<SUBAGENT-STOP> If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill entirely. Do not start a new QRSPI pipeline — just do your assigned work. </SUBAGENT-STOP>

Using QRSPI

Recommended Workspace Layout

Read skills/using-qrspi/references/workspace-layout.md when setting up a new run's on-disk layout or auditing an existing one — artifact/code separation (docs/qrspi/{slug}/ vs target repo) and the greenfield bootstrap note.

The Pipeline

Read skills/using-qrspi/references/pipeline-overview.md when you need the full pipeline shape — both diagrams (full + quick-fix) and the per-step what/why/artifact table.

Route Templates

Read skills/using-qrspi/references/route-templates.md when Goals is seeding config.md.route at run start, or when the user requests a mid-pipeline route change — quick / full / full-plus-UX templates plus the route-change rules.

Artifact Directory

Read skills/using-qrspi/references/artifact-directory.md when creating the artifact directory for a new run, or when resolving the slug for an existing run — full per-run on-disk tree (docs/qrspi/YYYY-MM-DD-{slug}/...) and slug-generation rule.

Topology Contract (Plugin Root vs Artifact Root)

QRSPI dispatch scripts operate under a two-root topology contract: plugin assets and user artifacts live in different trees and must be configurable independently.

  • PLUGIN_ROOT — immutable plugin assets (skills/, agents/, scripts/, scripts/lib/). Derived from the dispatch wrapper's own location (scripts/..). Override via QRSPI_REPO_ROOT for tests. REPO_ROOT is a back-compat alias.
  • ARTIFACT_ROOT — the user repo where artifacts live and git diff runs. Resolved by precedence (same 4-step ladder on both dispatch-agent.sh and dispatch-companion.sh launch): (1) QRSPI_ARTIFACT_ROOT env var, (2) --artifact-repo-root <path> flag, (3) git rev-parse --show-toplevel discovered from --output-dir (or --round-dir on companion launch), (4) fall back to PLUGIN_ROOT. dispatch-companion.sh await does NOT parse --artifact-repo-root and derives its trust anchor for the round directory from $PWD/.. (the await-round.sh cwd contract) rather than from the job record; $QRSPI_ARTIFACT_ROOT env still applies to ARTIFACT_ROOT resolution in await as in launch.

The two roots may coincide (vendored-submodule install, where the artifact directory lives inside the QRSPI repo itself) or diverge (Copilot CLI plugin install, where ~/.copilot/installed-plugins/qrspi-plus/ carries the assets and the user repo carries the artifacts). Skills and scripts MUST NOT assume a single shared root.

Path-guard wiring inside dispatch scripts:

  • Plugin-asset paths (--agent-file, --skill[*], --companion for plugin assets) use assert_path_under_plugin_root (or the legacy assert_path_under_repo_root alias).
  • Artifact-class paths (--artifact, --diff-file, --task-def, --subject-code, --artifact-body, --output-dir, companion-launch --round-dir / --prompt-file) use assert_path_under_artifact_root.

Approval Markers

Read skills/using-qrspi/references/approval-markers.md when transitioning a step to status: approved (or replan-draft), or before the post-approval git commit — semantics and commit rule.

State and Pipeline Ordering

Pipeline state is derived from artifact frontmatter; the only piece of derived state worth persisting is phase_start_commit (lives in plan.md frontmatter, scoped by Replan and Test).

Read skills/using-qrspi/references/state-and-pipeline-ordering.md before dispatching a downstream step when checking predecessor-approval gating — predecessor rules and the Implement batch trap. Orchestration-boundary enforcement lives in each phase SKILL (implement/, integrate/, test/).

Rejection Behavior

When the user rejects an artifact at a human gate, the current step re-runs with feedback until approved — never skips backward. For subagent-dispatching steps (Plan, Parallelize, Structure), the orchestrator launches a new subagent round with the original inputs plus a feedback file (see Feedback File Format below). For conversational steps (Goals, Design), the rejection iterates in-conversation without writing a feedback file.

Backward Loops (New Learnings)

Read skills/using-qrspi/references/backward-loops.md when a downstream step surfaces new learnings about an upstream artifact — cascade-forward rule.

Mid-Pipeline Entry

Users can enter mid-pipeline when required input artifacts already exist with status: approved; mid-pipeline resume also detects replan-pending.md to resume Replan when set.

Read skills/using-qrspi/references/mid-pipeline-entry.md when resuming a run partway through the pipeline (artifact directory already exists, some steps already approved) — full resume contract and existing-artifacts handshake.

Pipeline Progress

Read skills/using-qrspi/references/pipeline-progress.md when unsure where the run currently sits in the pipeline — diagnostic for resolving ambiguous status.

Artifact Gating Check (Standard Pattern)

!cat skills/using-qrspi/references/artifact-gating-check.md

Config File (config.md)

Read skills/using-qrspi/references/config-runtime-contract.md when validating any config.md field, dispatching an agent, resolving a model_routing: tier, or handling a runtime-backfill write — dispatch routing blocks (providers:, model_routing:, trusted_path:, validators:), Precedence chain, Config Validation Procedure, no-silent-defaults rule, runtime-backfill carve-outs + hard-stop on write-back failure, field-validation-by-skill table. The authoring side (format, field definitions, writing procedure, pipeline: quick semantics) lives at skills/goals/references/config-md-authoring.md and is !cat-included into Goals — read it directly only when auditing Goals' config-writing behavior.

Standard Review Loop

Every artifact-producing step runs the Standard Review Loop. Read skills/_shared/review-loop.md when dispatching reviewers, computing kept findings, or deciding fix-loop convergence — canonical SSoT (checklist + reviewer dispatch shape + convergence rule). Sweep-task findings ride the existing Plan re-spec loop (no new gate, no new runner behavior).

Apply-Fix Protocol

After each review round, the orchestrator invokes scripts/review-prep.sh (per-round diff emission with anchor-SHA narrow-ref, atomic temp+rename) then scripts/verifier-fan-in.sh (SSoT for verifier dispatch, change_type-keyed score filters, round-NN-verified.md assembly). Read skills/using-qrspi/references/apply-fix-protocol.md after verifier-fan-in.sh emits round-NN-verified.md, when applying fixes for the round — the full post-fan-in procedure (partition by change_type, scope-tagger dispatch, dispositions.md, per-round commit, convergence rule, backward-loop reset, reviewer-model audit-field, verifier-round failure menu). Read skills/using-qrspi/references/fix-altitude-rule.md when a finding contains the phrase "X is under-specified" — the F-5 altitude rule. <!-- id-hygiene-exempt -->

Review-Loop Pause Gate

Inside an autonomous review loop (option 2 from the Standard Review Loop), the loop pauses when reviewers surface findings the orchestrating skill cannot safely auto-apply. The 10-round review-loop cap does not decrement on a paused round — paused rounds are user-interactive, not autonomous.

Read skills/using-qrspi/references/review-loop-pause-gate.md when the review loop hits the pause gate (review-round kept-findings non-zero, or a sub-threshold rescue is being surfaced) — full BATCH-WITH-OVERRIDES UI contract, 3-option menu (apply / skip / loop-back to upstream), infinite-pause escape hatch, and pending-findings audit-file shape.

Compaction Checkpoints

QRSPI skills mark transition points where main-chat context bloat degrades downstream quality. At every checkpoint and at every user-input pause, the orchestrator follows the Iron Rule below — regardless of perceived utilization, regardless of auto-mode.

Iron Rule. Pause and recommend /compact to the user before continuing. The user can decline; do not skip the recommendation.

Read skills/using-qrspi/references/compaction-checkpoints-detail.md when approaching a context-saturation checkpoint and unsure which trigger applies for the current step — full list of checkpoint trigger points per pipeline step.

Feedback File Format

Read skills/using-qrspi/references/feedback-file-format.md when writing or consuming a feedback file after a rejection round in Plan, Parallelize, or Structure — {artifact-dir}/feedback/{step}-round-{NN}.md YAML+markdown schema. Goals/Design rejection flows interactively and does not produce feedback files.

Common Rationalizations — STOP

!cat skills/using-qrspi/references/common-rationalizations.md

Pipeline Rules

!cat skills/using-qrspi/references/iron-laws.md

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.