writing-beats
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Writing, exploit; assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.
79 other projects use a version of this, 69 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- 5thlayer/skillworksedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- op3616windows/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- miklschmidt/archboardedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Tresnanda/kybernedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ZeroTokenClaw/agents-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- George-RD/openspineedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use obsidian-vault, batch-grill-me and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
simo97Skillobsidian-vault
Also in 26 projects that use this
boyingliu01Skillbatch-grill-me
A relentless interview that asks every frontier question at once, round by round. Thin alias of `grilling` (#540) — upstream mattpocock/skills absorbed this protocol into grilling; XP-Gate keeps this name as the sprint-flow Phase 2 entry point so orchestration docs stay stable.
Also in 5 projects that use this
FabienDehopreSkilldecision-mapping
Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GoogleSkillask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Also in 35 projects that use this
getnaoSkillchief-of-staff
Also in 11 projects that use this
Other versions79 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 69
- mattpocock/skills★ 309k100% same
- InditexTech/weavejs★ 26671% same
- loulanyue/skills★ 231100% same
- tt-a1i/matt-skills-with-to-goal★ 192100% same
- Tresnanda/kybern★ 83100% same
- VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp★ 28100% same
- metrogg/AgentHub★ 1971% same
- George-RD/design-studio★ 10100% same
- caterpi11ar/giclaw★ 9100% same
- getmodern-ai/graft★ 9100% same
59 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 10
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- devcxl/mattpocock-skills-zh★ 522same name
- WenWuZhiDao/mattpocock-skills-zh★ 27same name
- imMamdouhaboammar/matts-skills-into-chatgpt★ 8same name
- Boom-Vitt/skills-thai★ 5same name
- malinskibeniamin/skills★ 4same name
- shumingyang-opencode/mattpocock-skills-zh-tw★ 3same name
- Artknighty/skills-ptbr★ 0same name
- hmjBill/skills★ 0same name
- popsiclelmlm/skills-cn★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ask-compassSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- implementSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- probe-with-docsSkill
- prototypeSkill
- researchSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- scoutSkill
- setup-compassSkill
- tddSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- triageSkill
- wizardSkill
- claude-handoffSkill
- implement-specSkill
- loop-meSkill
- retroSkill
- setup-ts-deep-modulesSkill
- writing-fragmentsSkill
- writing-shapeSkill
- git-guardrails-claude-codeSkill
- migrate-to-shoehornSkill
- scaffold-exercisesSkill
- setup-pre-commitSkill
- handoffSkill
- probe-meSkill
- probingSkill
- teachSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 5 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
5
Common
Most of the 71 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 17
If the user did not say where to save the article, ask once and remember the path.
- Common: line 21
Establish the prerequisites: Before any beats, settle with the user what the audience already knows walking in: the concepts that are …
- Common: line 56
If a "beat" needs five paragraphs and three subheadings, it's not a beat.
- Common: line 70
If the user edits a previous beat substantially, let it change what comes next.
- Common: line 71
If the user says "rewrite that beat" or "go back and try a different beat 3", do it: edit in place, leave the rest alone.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 71 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<what-to-do>The user has passed (or will pass) a markdown file of raw material. This is exploit: the exploring is done, the pile is fixed. Commit to a path through it and mine the pile to fill each beat.
If the user did not say where to save the article, ask once and remember the path.
Then run a beat-by-beat journey, choose-your-own-adventure style:
- Establish the prerequisites. Before any beats, settle with the user what the audience already knows walking in: the concepts that are grounded from the start. Everything else must be grounded by a beat before a later beat can use it. See Grounding.
- Write 2–3 candidate starting beats, drawn from the raw material. Each is a different entry point into the article. Each may only lean on grounded concepts; note what new concepts each one grounds. Show the user the beats before writing to the article file. The user picks one. Preview what beats that pick unlocks, as if the user is seeing a little way down the path.
- Once the user picks a starting beat, write only that beat to the article file. A beat may be one sentence or several paragraphs, whatever that beat naturally is. Stop there.
- Re-read the article file from disk. Then offer 2–3 candidate next beats: different directions the journey could pivot to from where the article now stands. Each must be reachable from the current grounded set; note what each one grounds.
- Loop steps 3–5 until the article reaches a natural end.
</what-to-do><supporting-info>Grounding
Every concept has to be grounded before a beat can lean on it: the audience either walked in knowing it or met it in an earlier beat. A beat that reaches for an ungrounded concept loses the reader; that is the one move the journey can't make. The unit is the concept, not the word for it: a beat can lean on an idea the reader lacks even with no jargon in sight. Where a concept has a name (a term), grounding it means landing the idea and the term together.
A concept gets grounded one of two ways:
- Prerequisite: grounded before the first beat. The audience brings it. Fixed at the start.
- Introduced: a beat establishes it, and from then on it's grounded for every later beat.
So each beat does two jobs: it requires concepts that are already grounded, and it grounds new ones. Keep a running list of what's grounded so far, and update it each time a beat lands.
This is what shapes the choose-your-own-adventure. A candidate beat is only reachable if everything it requires is already grounded; picking a beat that grounds concept X unlocks every beat that was waiting on X. When you offer next beats, they must all be reachable from the current grounded set, and say what each one grounds, so the user can see which paths it opens.
The big lever is what you make a prerequisite versus what you ground inside the piece. Demand too much up front and you shut out readers who don't have it; ground too much inside and the early beats drown in definitions. Settle this with the user when you establish prerequisites, and revisit it whenever a tempting beat turns out to require a concept nothing has grounded yet: the fix is either a grounding beat before it, or promoting the concept to a prerequisite.
What is a beat
A beat is one move in the journey. It does one thing: sets a scene, lands a point, asks a question, drops an aside, twists the angle. Then it stops, leaving the reader at a place where the next beat can pivot.
A beat is sized by what it needs:
- A single sentence if that's all the move is ("And then nothing happened for three weeks.").
- A short paragraph if the move needs setup.
- Multiple paragraphs if the beat is a self-contained vignette, argument, or example.
If a "beat" needs five paragraphs and three subheadings, it's not a beat; it's two beats glued together. Split it.
Pulling from the pile
Pull material from the raw pile to populate each beat. You can paraphrase, split, recombine, or quote. The pile is a quarry.
Ending the journey
The article ends when the journey is complete, not when the pile is empty. Most piles will have leftover fragments that don't make it in. That is fine; that is the point of having more raw material than you need.
Writing rhythm
- Append one beat at a time. Never write ahead.
- Re-read the article file from disk before every write. Preserve user edits absolutely.
- If the user edits a previous beat substantially, let it change what comes next.
- If the user says "rewrite that beat" or "go back and try a different beat 3", do it: edit in place, leave the rest alone.
</supporting-info>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

