wiki-query
Skill1 starsChanged 47 days agoMITView on GitHub
Answer a question from an LLM wiki: find and read the relevant pages, answer with the page paths you relied on, check anything mutable at its original source, say plainly what the wiki does not cover, and file substantial answers back as query pages so the research compounds. Use when a person asks something the wiki may cover, or after an answer took real research.
41 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Ar9av/obsidian-wikitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- barakgut/llm-wikitheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- chobizzy/llm-wikitheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- wareagledusty/wiki-federation-starter-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ProduktEntdecker/enterprise-memory-startertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- hmjBill/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 29, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use wiki-update, wiki-research and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
bozhouDevSkillwiki-update
Use when revising existing wiki pages because knowledge has changed, a new piece of information updates or contradicts existing content, or the user wants to directly edit wiki content with LLM assistance.
Also in 9 projects that use this
Ivy-Chen1999Skillwiki-research
Autonomously research a topic via multi-round web search, synthesize findings, and file structured results into the Obsidian wiki. Use this skill when the user says "/wiki-research [topic]", "research X", "find everything about Y", "do a deep dive on Z", "autonomous research on X", or wants comprehensive, web-sourced knowledge on a topic filed directly into their wiki.
Also in 4 projects that use this
bozhouDevSkillwiki-init
Use when bootstrapping a new personal wiki for any knowledge domain — research, codebase documentation, reading notes, competitive analysis, or any long-term knowledge accumulation project.
Also in 7 projects that use this
Ivy-Chen1999Skillclaude-history-ingest
Ingest Claude Code conversation history into the Obsidian wiki. Use this skill when the user wants to mine their past Claude conversations for knowledge, import their ~/.claude folder, extract insights from previous coding sessions, or says things like "process my Claude history", "add my conversations to the wiki", "what have I discussed with Claude before". Also triggers when the user mentions their .claude folder, Claude projects, session data, past conversation logs, local-agent-mode sessions, or audit logs.
Also in 3 projects that use this
nathanadaySkillalmagest
Orient in the Almagest vault, say what waits for the user, do the work a request asks in a linked repository, and route any other request to the skill that owns it. Use for /almagest, what is going on, status, what waits for me, where do I work on X, work on X, fix this, implement, build, note this, remember to, publish my journal, what is in my journals, and any request when the right skill is not clear. Keeping part of this conversation is wiki-save; files to learn from are wiki-ingest.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +4 more from Ivy-Chen1999
Other versions41 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 41
- AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian★ 16ksame name
- Ar9av/obsidian-wiki★ 3.7ksame name
- rohitg00/pro-workflow★ 2.9ksame name
- kfchou/wiki-skills★ 189same name
- bozhouDev/bozhou-skills★ 78same name
- vanillaflava/llm-wiki-skills★ 65same name
- cookyman74/llmwiki-harness★ 34same name
- Ivy-Chen1999/llm-wiki-kit★ 21same name
- CarbeneAI/Forge★ 9same name
- CodePhobiia/claude-roblox-game-studio★ 9same name
31 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- wiki-captureSkill
- wiki-conflictsSkill
- wiki-ingestSkill
- wiki-lintSkill
- wiki-orientSkill
- wiki-recordSkill
- wiki-refactorSkill
- wiki-reviewSkill
- wiki-setupSkill
- wiki-sharedSkill
- wiki-verifySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 33 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
Check mutable facts at their source: before presenting them as current: prices, configuration, account state, who holds a role, anything …
- Distinctive: line 29
File the answer back when it is substantial: If the answer needed several pages, outside research, or a judgment worth keeping, write it as …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 33 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Answer from a wiki
A wiki earns its upkeep when answers come from it faster and better than from scratch, and when good answers are kept so the next question starts further ahead.
Steps
- Orient on the question (
wiki-orient): search two or three phrasings, read the canonical page and the neighbors that bear on it. - Answer from what you read, and cite it. Give the page paths the answer rests on. If you combine pages, say so. If a page's claim carries a trust label (vendor-sourced, estimate, unverified), carry the label into the answer.
- Check mutable facts at their source before presenting them as current: prices,
configuration, account state, who holds a role, anything with a date older than the
decision it will feed. Say what you checked. If the source disagrees with the wiki, the
answer uses the source and the wiki gets fixed (
wiki-recordorwiki-conflicts). - Say what the wiki does not cover. "The wiki has nothing on X" is a useful answer; a plausible guess presented as if it came from the wiki is a harmful one. If you fill the gap from outside research, mark which parts came from where.
- File the answer back when it is substantial. If the answer needed several pages, outside research, or a judgment worth keeping, write it as a query page (below). Trivial lookups are not filed.
- Fix what you found on the way. A broken link, a stale date, a missing link between two pages you needed together: fix it with a small edit and a note, or report it.
Query page
Under queries/ (or where the schema puts them), named for the question:
---
title: Which vendors include SSO on their base plan?
description: One line with the short answer, not the question.
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
type: query
tags: [...]
sources: [pages and URLs consulted]
confidence: high | medium | low
---
# Which vendors include SSO on their base plan?
Question (who asked, date).
## Short answer
Two to four sentences.
## Evidence
What was consulted, with links to wiki pages and sources, and the numbers that carry the
answer.
## Confidence and gaps
What would change the answer, and what was not checked.Link the query page from the pages it draws on when it adds something they lack, so the answer is found from the topic and not only by search. When a follow-up question arrives in the same thread, add it as a section of the same query page rather than a new page.
Pitfalls
- Answering from memory with the wiki open. If you did not read it in the wiki or a source this session, it is unverified; say so.
- Citing a page for a claim the page does not make. Quote or paraphrase closely enough that the reader can find the sentence.
- Filing every answer. A
queries/folder full of one-line lookups buries the real syntheses.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

