agentleFS
devkindhqdevkindhq/ideogram-ai-toolkit/skills/marketing-ui-mockup-hero-generator/SKILL.md

marketing-ui-mockup-hero-generator

Skill3 starsChanged 13 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Generates finished raster marketing visuals — landing-page hero shots, device-in-context product mockups, and dashboard screenshots — and actually renders them via the ideogram MCP tools, not just drafts a prompt. Use whenever the user asks for a "hero image," "landing page hero," "device mockup," "product mockup," "dashboard screenshot," "App Store screenshot," "pitch deck visual," or "pitch deck screenshot." This skill produces finished images, not functional HTML/CSS/React — a request for working code, a live component, or a responsive layout should go to a code-output tool instead, never get pulled into this skill just because it also involves UI. Sibling to `brand-identity-sheet`, `character-model-sheet`, and `moodboard-generator` structurally (same prompt-composition pattern, same paragraph-prompt + compositional-deconstruction pair of artifacts), but targets marketing-visual deliverables — a single hero shot, a device-in-context product photo, a dashboard screen — rather than a whole brand system or a character sheet.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Always produce both. The paragraph prompt is what you feed the image model.

    line 36
  2. Distinctive:

    Ask for, or pull from context:

    line 49
  3. Very specific:

    Call mcp__ideogram__generate_image with the paragraph prompt.

    line 86
  4. Very specific:

    If a specific element comes back wrong after generation — a garbled CTA label, a misspelled nav item, a headline needing a word changed — …

    line 112
  5. Very specific:

    Write the paragraph prompt, the compositional deconstruction JSON, and the resulting image URL(s) (base + any reframed variants) to …

    line 128

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Marketing UI Mockup / Hero Generator

This skill produces one of three fixed format types, each a finished raster image rendered via Ideogram, not a mockup described in prose or built as working code:

  • Landing-page hero shot — a full-bleed marketing hero with headline, subheadline, and CTA button copy baked in via Ideogram's text rendering, typically showing the product in a browser/device frame or as a standalone visual. The shot a visitor sees before scrolling.
  • Device-in-context product mockup — a product's UI shown inside a physical device shell (laptop, phone, tablet, browser chrome) placed in an environmental or lifestyle context (desk surface, hand, studio backdrop). The format for pitch-deck slides and "see it in the real world" shots.
  • Dashboard screenshot — a single stylized app/dashboard screen (nav, cards, charts, sidebar) rendered to look polished and "real" for App Store listings, pitch decks, or marketing pages — not a literal render of any actual live codebase.

See references/mockup-anatomy.md for each format's full compositional-layer breakdown; read it before drafting a prompt (workflow step 2 below), not reverse-engineered only after generation.

The two artifacts this skill produces

  1. A generation prompt — a paragraph, Ideogram-legible, naming every assigned compositional layer in reading order with literal copy in quotes.
  2. A compositional deconstruction — the structured JSON breakdown per references/composition-spec-format.md, tagging each element with which compositional layer it belongs to so a later step can reference "the CTA element from the hero shot" without re-describing it.

Always produce both. The paragraph prompt is what you feed the image model; the compositional deconstruction is what you save back to the vault so the mockup's structure survives past the single image.

This skill is a sibling to brand-identity-sheet, character-model-sheet, and moodboard-generator structurally — same paragraph-prompt-plus-JSON-deconstruction pattern — but targets marketing-visual deliverables (hero shots, device mockups, dashboard screenshots) rather than brand systems or characters.

Workflow

1. Gather the brief

Ask for, or pull from context:

  • Format type — hero / device mockup / dashboard screenshot. If the user's phrasing is ambiguous ("make a mockup"), use references/mockup-anatomy.md's definitions to clarify which of the three they mean rather than guessing (see Error handling below).
  • Real headline/subhead/CTA/nav copy — ask directly if it's missing rather than filling with placeholder text.
  • Brand truth from the project's brand.md/design.md if one exists — palette, typography, adjectives. Same pull-don't-reinvent pattern brand-identity-sheet's step 1 uses.
  • Target placements — landing page only, or also a social-square variant, or also an App Store portrait crop. This determines whether workflow step 6 (reframe) runs.

2. Assign compositional layers

Using references/mockup-anatomy.md's per-format layer table, decide which layers this format needs and what each one contains. This is the step that directly implements the UI-specific compositional-deconstruction differentiation angle — done before drafting the prompt, not reverse-engineered only after.

3. Draft the paragraph prompt

One Ideogram-legible paragraph naming each assigned layer in reading order with its literal copy in quotes. Apply the same "name real things, not generic placeholders" discipline brand-identity-sheet step 3 uses for its material vocabulary, here applied to UI copy and product specifics: a real nav-item label, not "Home / About / Contact"; a real chart metric, not "a chart."

4. Run the anti-slop gate

Score the drafted prompt against references/anti-slop-discipline.md's pre-generation table before calling generate_image. Anything scoring under 3 on any axis means revise now, not after generating.

5. Generate the base image

Call mcp__ideogram__generate_image with the paragraph prompt.

  • style_type: "DESIGN" for UI-chrome-dominant formats (dashboard screenshots, hero shots where the UI panel is the focal element), "REALISTIC" for photographic device-in-context shots. This mapping is documented guidance to sanity-check against the actual result, not a verified Ideogram model guarantee.
  • rendering_speed: "QUALITY" always.
  • aspect_ratio: pick for the primary target placement — e.g. "16x9" for a landing-page hero, "1x1" for a dashboard screenshot destined for a square social post, "9x16" for an App Store portrait screenshot.

6. Reframe for additional formats, if requested

For each additional placement gathered in step 1, call mcp__ideogram__reframe_image with the base generation's response_id and the target aspect_ratio, rather than re-running generate_image from scratch.

Crop-risk caveat: before reframing to a significantly different aspect ratio, check whether the base composition's Hero Copy Zone/CTA elements sit safely away from the frame edges (from the compositional deconstruction produced in step 8, or by inspection if step 8 hasn't run yet for this composition). If the layout is aspect-ratio-sensitive, tell the user a fresh generate_image composed for that target ratio will look better than a reframe.

7. Targeted fixes via edit_image, not full regeneration

If a specific element comes back wrong after generation — a garbled CTA label, a misspelled nav item, a headline needing a word changed — call mcp__ideogram__edit_image with image_response_ids and a prompt describing only the fix. Do not fall back to a fresh generate_image or remix_image call to "get a similar but fixed" result — that silently discards a composition that was otherwise correct.

8. Reverse-engineer into a compositional deconstruction

Produce the structured JSON breakdown per references/composition-spec-format.md, tagging each element with which compositional layer it is (Nav Bar, Hero Copy Zone, CTA, Device Frame/Chrome, Supporting UI Chrome, Background/Environment) so a later step can reference "the CTA element from the hero shot" without re-describing it.

9. Save what was made

Write the paragraph prompt, the compositional deconstruction JSON, and the resulting image URL(s) (base + any reframed variants) to 04-projects/<project>/marketing-assets/ (or wherever the project already keeps marketing visuals — check for an existing folder first, matching the pattern brand-identity-sheet/character-model-sheet use for logo-explorations// branding/). Nothing generated here should live only in the conversation.

Error handling

  • User actually wants working code / a functional prototype — say plainly this skill produces finished raster images, not editable/responsive code, and redirect to an HTML/CSS-output tool. Never fake interactivity in a static image, never silently produce an image when code was requested.
  • User wants a pixel-accurate recreation of a real, existing live product screen — flag before generating that Ideogram's diffusion output is a stylized representation, not a pixel-accurate screenshot tool; set that expectation explicitly.
  • Garbled, misspelled, or illegible on-screen text after generation — treat as a defect, attempt a targeted edit_image fix (workflow step 7), and if that doesn't resolve it after a reasonable attempt, report the defect honestly rather than shipping or describing broken text as acceptable.
  • reframe_image cropping into important copy — per workflow step 6's caveat, check hero-copy/CTA placement safety before reframing to a significantly different aspect ratio; prefer a fresh generate_image over a reframe that would clip copy.
  • Missing real copy (no headline/CTA/nav text supplied, no brand.md) — ask for it directly rather than inventing final marketing copy wholesale; a placeholder is acceptable only when the user explicitly says this is a rough concept exploration, not a deliverable.
  • Ambiguous format type (user says "make a mockup" without specifying which of the three) — ask which of the three named format types they mean, using references/mockup-anatomy.md's definitions, rather than guessing and producing the wrong compositional layout.

Reference files

  • references/mockup-anatomy.md — the three format types (landing-page hero, device-in-context mockup, dashboard screenshot) and the compositional layers each is built from, with a per-format table stating which layers apply.
  • references/composition-spec-format.md — the full JSON schema for the compositional deconstruction (high_level_description, elements[] with type/bbox/desc, text elements with text), the layer-tagging convention, and a worked Orbitwell landing-hero example.
  • references/anti-slop-discipline.md — the UI-mockup-specific failure modes (meaningless charts, decorative dead-end sidebars, illegible micro-text-as-texture, stock-SaaS gradient washes, AI-glow screens with no real content), the real-copy requirement gate, and the pre-generation gate to run before every generate_image call.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.