3d-resources
CLAUDE.md1k starsChanged 7 days agoCC0-1.0View on GitHub
Read project.md at the start of every session. It is the master guide: filesystem map, data model, build pipeline, rules, pending tasks, design style. Treat it as authoritative when any other doc disagrees. Update project.md after every change. If filesystem layout, rules, goals, vocab, build steps, design conventions, or pending tasks shift, edit project.md in the same change. Stale project.md is a bug. Source of truth: schema/vocab.yml + schema/entry.schema.json. Rule: When adding/editing entries, only use values that already exist in…
Trending
Quiet since April.thin dataabout the whole repository
Who's talking about devanshutak25/3d-resources
The biggest 1 of 1 mention linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.
- memory/agents.mdAGENTS.md
The file
We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 7
Update
project.mdafter every change: If filesystem layout, rules, goals, vocab, build steps, design conventions, or pending tasks shift, … - Distinctive: line 13
Rule: When adding/editing entries, only use values that already exist in the vocab for these tag groups:
- Very specific: line 24
Never invent new values for closed enums: If an entry seems to need one (e.g.
- Distinctive: line 27
Ask the user if a genuinely new category is needed before extending the vocab.
- Very specific: line 33
Run node scripts/validate.js after any data edit.
- Very specific: line 63
Session start: Read project.md first, then all 8 files in ./memory/ before responding to first prompt.
- Very specific: line 67
Update any other file whose content changed (new decision → decisions.md.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
3d_resources — project rules
project.md (MANDATORY)
Read project.md at the start of every session. It is the master guide: filesystem map, data model, build pipeline, rules, pending tasks, design style. Treat it as authoritative when any other doc disagrees.
Update project.md after every change. If filesystem layout, rules, goals, vocab, build steps, design conventions, or pending tasks shift, edit project.md in the same change. Stale project.md is a bug.
Controlled vocabulary (entry tags)
Source of truth: schema/vocab.yml + schema/entry.schema.json.
Rule: When adding/editing entries, only use values that already exist in the vocab for these tag groups:
license(closed enum)entry_type(closed enum)tags.workflow(closed enum)tags.output(closed enum)tags.platform(closed enum)tags.skill(closed enum)
tags.tech is freeform but curated — prefer existing values; new ones produce warnings, not errors.
Never invent new values for closed enums. If an entry seems to need one (e.g. product-design, print, visionos, tracking, rotoscoping), do NOT add it silently to vocab.yml or entry.schema.json. Instead:
- Map to the closest existing value (e.g.
product-design→product-viz,tracking/rotoscoping→compositing), OR drop the tag if no good fit. - Ask the user if a genuinely new category is needed before extending the vocab.
CI runs node scripts/validate.js — closed-enum violations exit 1 and block merge.
Validation
Run node scripts/validate.js after any data edit. Must show ✓ Validation passed. before commit.
Writing style (user-facing text)
Applies to: data/**/*.yml (descriptions, titles, readme_tags), template strings in scripts/render.js, scripts/build-html.js, scripts/build-section-pages.js, scripts/build-feed.js, scripts/build-llms-txt.js, scripts/build-og-images.js, and any other surface a site visitor reads.
Rules:
- No em-dashes (
—). Ever. In titles, use:. In prose, use.(period + capitalize next word) or,depending on context. The OG-image splitter (build-og-images.js) keys on:for two-line layout — don't reintroduce em-dashes. - No AI tells. Banned words/phrases:
comprehensive,robust,powerful,seamless(ly),leverage(s/d)(use "use"),utilize(s/d/ing)(use "use"),cutting-edge,state-of-the-art,the ultimate,game-changing,unleash. Banned trailing phrases:and more,and beyond,and so much more. - No marketing adjective stacks ("fast, free, and powerful"). One concrete attribute beats three vague ones.
- Caveman lite for descriptions. Terse, factual, 1 sentence preferred. State what it is and what it does. Drop hype.
- Internal docs/memory/CLAUDE.md/comments are exempt. Em-dashes and informal hedging are fine there.
Project memory system (/memory)
Local, project-scoped memory lives in ./memory/. Distinct from global ~/.claude memory.
Files:
goals.md— active + done goalstech_stack.md— frameworks, langs, build tools in usedecisions.md— dated architectural/structural decisions w/ rationalepreferences.md— user collab style + project rulestools.md— CLIs / utilities in active useagents.md— sub-agents used + outcomesplugins.md— skills + MCP extensions in useuser-prompts.md— verbatim log of every user prompt + 1-line answer
Protocol (MANDATORY)
Session start: Read project.md first, then all 8 files in ./memory/ before responding to first prompt. Treat them as authoritative project context.
After every user prompt:
- Append the verbatim prompt to
user-prompts.mdwith timestamp + 1-line answer summary. - Update any other file whose content changed (new decision →
decisions.md; new tool used →tools.md; new preference learned →preferences.md; etc.).
Session end: Final sweep — ensure all files reflect latest state. Add new decisions, move completed goals to Done, log any agents spawned.
Rule: keep entries terse (caveman lite). No filler. Date everything (YYYY-MM-DD).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

