agentleFS
devaimanidevaimani/openai-ads-mcp/skills/ads-geo/SKILL.md

ads-geo

Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Set up location targeting for OpenAI Ads — postcodes, regions, countries. Use this skill for geo targeting, local customers, catchment area, service radius, location, region, postcode, or whenever ads should only appear in certain areas.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Always select by postcode, never by name.

    line 61

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Location targeting

Available levels

Verified against the live API on 2026-09-04 for Germany:

TypeExampleID
countryGermany1000056
regionBaden-Württemberg2000346
postal_code10115 Berlin10015849

postal_code appears in no documentation but works. Postcode-level targeting is therefore possible.

dma does not exist for Germany. It never appeared in any query and looks US-specific.

Radius targeting does not exist. Model a catchment area as a list of postcodes. In practice that is more precise, because it follows municipal boundaries rather than a circle.

With no location set, the campaign runs across every available area.

Three pitfalls

Umlauts are mandatory.

InputResults
Muenchen0
München78
Koeln0
Köln48

The search_geo tool rewrites ae/oe/ue automatically and tries both forms. Calling the API directly requires handling this yourself.

English exonyms find nothing German. Munich returns two results, none with country_code: DE. Same for Cologne.

Districts and localities do not exist. A German Landkreis returns no results, and neither do sub-municipal localities — those are covered by the parent town's postcode.

Duplicate names. Birkenfeld exists three times: 55765, 75217 and 97834. Always select by postcode, never by name.

Procedure

1. search_geo("Karlsruhe", country="DE")  -> collect IDs
2. Verify the postcodes match the intended place
3. create_campaign(location_ids=[...])

The resulting targeting object:

{"targeting": {"locations": {"include": [{"id": "10020757"}]}}}

Building a catchment area

Three tiers, from tight to wide. Pick by whether the service needs physical proximity.

Tier 1 — immediate surroundings. The postcodes of the home town and its neighbours. Suitable when someone has to travel to the customer.

Tier 2 — economic area. The nearest cities, each as a set of postcodes. A mid-sized German city typically has 7 to 15 postcode entries; large cities have 35 to 99.

Tier 3 — region or country. One region ID, or the country. Suitable when the service is delivered remotely.

Service typeRecommendationReason
Delivered remotelyTier 3 or nationwideproximity is irrelevant
Online-only productnationwideno travel involved
Requires an on-site visitTier 1–2travel time is the constraint

A tight area is not automatically better. On a young platform with thin volume, narrow targeting can mean almost nothing gets delivered. If the service can be delivered remotely, there is little reason to restrict — unless the copy deliberately plays on local proximity.

Sensible approach: start wide, then narrow based on results. Reporting with segment="country" shows where delivery lands. There is no breakdown by postcode.

Local proximity in the copy

Because delivery can only be steered coarsely, proximity mostly works through wording:

  • "Based in <region>", "On site in <city>", "Serving <area> since <year>"

This excludes nobody, but speaks to the people who care about proximity — and unlike narrow targeting, it costs no reach.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.