ui-without-slop
Skill1 starsChanged 32 days agoCC-BY-4.0View on GitHub
Removes and prevents the typical look of AI-generated interfaces, that is decorative dots in buttons, tags and menus, pills above headings, eyebrows, gradient text, purple gradients, glassmorphism, emoji instead of icons, identical cards, flat type with no hierarchy, and the stock kit of Inter-like fonts, Lucide icons and untouched shadcn/ui or Magic UI components. Replaces each pattern with a design decision, including how to choose a typeface, icons and a component look. Use when these need to be removed from or prevented in an existing or in-progress UI (website, component, dashboard), when someone wants a less obvious font, icons other than Lucide or components that don't look like shadcn, and when someone says the UI "looks AI-generated", "looks like Claude made it", "looks generic", "looks like every shadcn site", has "dots everywhere", too many badges or a flat headline. Building a site from a plan is website-build, and a full review is website-review.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- brandbookSkill
- business-websiteSkill
- company-researchSkill
- copy-without-slopSkill
- motion-designSkill
- ui-motionSkill
- ui-tokensSkill
- video-editSkill
- website-buildSkill
- website-planSkill
- website-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.