agentleFS
derHakenderHaken/SuperAntigravity/skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md

brainstorming

Skill439 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

19 rules. 1 is common, 16 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 1

    Common

    Most of the 173 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 16

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Start by understanding the current project context, then ask questions one at a time to refine the idea.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Do NOT invoke any implementation skill, write any code, scaffold any project, or take any implementation action until you have presented a …

    line 15
  3. Very specific:

    If the project has no existing files: skip the "Explore project context" step, start directly with clarifying questions, and create the …

    line 28
  4. Distinctive:

    The terminal state is loading writing-plans: Do NOT load frontend-design, mcp-builder, or any other implementation skill.

    line 67
  5. Common:

    Check out the current project state first (files, docs, recent commits)

    line 72
  6. Distinctive:

    Ask questions one at a time to refine the idea

    line 73
  7. Distinctive:

    Prefer multiple choice questions when possible, but open-ended is fine too

    line 74
  8. Distinctive:

    Only one question per message - if a topic needs more exploration, break it into multiple questions

    line 75
  9. Distinctive:

    Termination criterion for clarifying questions: Ask clarifying questions until: (a) you can restate the goal in one sentence, (b) you know …

    line 78
  10. Distinctive:

    Ask after each section whether it looks right so far

    line 88
  11. Distinctive:

    If the user approves with modifications: incorporate the modifications, re-present the changed section only, then proceed

    line 93
  12. Distinctive:

    Do not re-present unchanged sections

    line 94
  13. Very specific:

    Write the validated design to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md

    line 99
  14. Distinctive:

    Use elements-of-style:writing-clearly-and-concisely skill if available

    line 100
  15. Distinctive:

    Commit the design document to git

    line 101
  16. Distinctive:

    Do NOT load any other skill.

    line 105
  17. Distinctive:

    One question at a time: - Don't overwhelm with multiple questions

    line 109
  18. Distinctive:

    YAGNI ruthlessly: - Remove unnecessary features from all designs

    line 111
  19. Distinctive:

    Explore alternatives: - Always propose 2-3 approaches before settling

    line 112

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 173 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs

Overview

Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue.

Start by understanding the current project context, then ask questions one at a time to refine the idea. Once you understand what you're building, present the design and get user approval.

<HARD-GATE> Do NOT invoke any implementation skill, write any code, scaffold any project, or take any implementation action until you have presented a design and the user has approved it. This applies to EVERY project regardless of perceived simplicity.

Announce: "Design HARD-GATE: I will not write code or scaffold files until you approve this design."

An implementation action is: writing any file that will be part of the product (src/, lib/, app/), running npm init/create-*, generating scaffolding. </HARD-GATE>

Anti-Pattern: "This Is Too Simple To Need A Design"

Every project goes through this process. A todo list, a single-function utility, a config change — all of them. "Simple" projects are where unexamined assumptions cause the most wasted work. The design can be short (a few sentences for truly simple projects), but you MUST present it and get approval.

Greenfield Projects

If the project has no existing files: skip the "Explore project context" step, start directly with clarifying questions, and create the docs/ directory as the first implementation action after approval.

Checklist

You MUST create a task for each of these items and complete them in order:

  1. Explore project context — check files, docs, recent commits
  2. Ensure Planning Mode — prompt user to switch to Planning Mode if not already active
  3. Ask clarifying questions — one at a time, understand purpose/constraints/success criteria
  4. Propose 2-3 approaches — with trade-offs and your recommendation
  5. Present design — in sections scaled to their complexity, get user approval after each section
  6. Write design doc — save to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md and commit
  7. Transition to implementation — load writing-plans skill to create implementation plan

Process Flow

digraph brainstorming {
    "Explore project context" [shape=box];
    "Ask clarifying questions" [shape=box];
    "Propose 2-3 approaches" [shape=box];
    "Present design sections" [shape=box];
    "User approves design?" [shape=diamond];
    "Incorporate modifications, re-present changed section" [shape=box];
    "Write design doc" [shape=box];
    "Load writing-plans skill" [shape=doublecircle];

    "Explore project context" -> "Ask clarifying questions";
    "Ask clarifying questions" -> "Propose 2-3 approaches";
    "Propose 2-3 approaches" -> "Present design sections";
    "Present design sections" -> "User approves design?";
    "User approves design?" -> "Present design sections" [label="no, revise"];
    "User approves design?" -> "Incorporate modifications, re-present changed section" [label="approved with modifications"];
    "Incorporate modifications, re-present changed section" -> "Write design doc";
    "User approves design?" -> "Write design doc" [label="yes"];
    "Write design doc" -> "Load writing-plans skill";
}

The terminal state is loading writing-plans. Do NOT load frontend-design, mcp-builder, or any other implementation skill. The ONLY skill you load after brainstorming is writing-plans.

The Process

Understanding the idea:

  • Check out the current project state first (files, docs, recent commits)
  • Ask questions one at a time to refine the idea
  • Prefer multiple choice questions when possible, but open-ended is fine too
  • Only one question per message - if a topic needs more exploration, break it into multiple questions
  • Focus on understanding: purpose, constraints, success criteria

Termination criterion for clarifying questions: Ask clarifying questions until: (a) you can restate the goal in one sentence, (b) you know the top constraint, (c) you understand the success criteria. Stop at 3-5 questions unless complexity demands more.

Exploring approaches:

  • Propose 2-3 different approaches with trade-offs
  • Present options conversationally with your recommendation and reasoning
  • Lead with your recommended option and explain why

Presenting the design:

  • Once you believe you understand what you're building, present the design
  • Scale each section to its complexity: a few sentences if straightforward, up to 200-300 words if nuanced
  • Ask after each section whether it looks right so far
  • Cover: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing
  • Be ready to go back and clarify if something doesn't make sense

Handling partial approval:

  • If the user approves with modifications: incorporate the modifications, re-present the changed section only, then proceed
  • Do not re-present unchanged sections

After the Design

Documentation:

  • Write the validated design to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md
  • Use elements-of-style:writing-clearly-and-concisely skill if available
  • Commit the design document to git

Implementation:

  • Load the writing-plans skill to create a detailed implementation plan
  • Do NOT load any other skill. writing-plans is the next step.

Key Principles

  • One question at a time - Don't overwhelm with multiple questions
  • Multiple choice preferred - Easier to answer than open-ended when possible
  • YAGNI ruthlessly - Remove unnecessary features from all designs
  • Explore alternatives - Always propose 2-3 approaches before settling
  • Incremental validation - Present design, get approval before moving on
  • Be flexible - Go back and clarify when something doesn't make sense

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.