finding-stale-todos
Skill1 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Find forgotten TODO/FIXME/HACK comments and track their age using git blame. Copy this checklist: Find all TODO-style comments in the codebase: Patterns detected: Correlate TODOs with git history: Output includes: TODOs are grouped into staleness buckets: Create actionable markdown report: Report includes: User: "Find forgotten TODOs in this project" Sample output: Filter by patterns or paths:
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 58
Commit date when TODO was added
- Distinctive: line 76
Create actionable markdown report:
- Very specific: line 106
Run find_todos.py . → Finds 47 TODOs
- Very specific: line 107
Run analyze_staleness.py .
- Very specific: line 108
Run generate_report.py . → Creates report with:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Stale TODO Finder
Find forgotten TODO/FIXME/HACK comments and track their age using git blame.
Quick Start
Copy this checklist:
Stale TODO Analysis:
- [ ] Step 1: Scan for TODO comments
- [ ] Step 2: Analyze staleness with git blame
- [ ] Step 3: Categorize by age
- [ ] Step 4: Generate actionable reportWorkflow
Step 1: Scan for TODO Comments
Find all TODO-style comments in the codebase:
python scripts/find_todos.py <directory> --format jsonPatterns detected:
TODO,FIXME,HACK,XXX,BUG,OPTIMIZE- Works across Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Java, C/C++, Ruby, Rust
Step 2: Analyze Staleness
Correlate TODOs with git history:
python scripts/analyze_staleness.py <directory> --min-age 90Output includes:
- Commit date when TODO was added
- Age in days
- Original author
- File and line number
Step 3: Categorize by Age
TODOs are grouped into staleness buckets:
| Category | Age | Priority |
| 🔴 Ancient | >1 year | High - likely forgotten |
| 🟠 Stale | 6-12 months | Medium - needs review |
| 🟡 Aging | 3-6 months | Low - monitor |
| 🟢 Recent | <3 months | OK - still relevant |
Step 4: Generate Report
Create actionable markdown report:
python scripts/generate_report.py <directory> --output stale_todos.mdReport includes:
- Summary statistics
- TODOs sorted by age (oldest first)
- Grouped by category
- Author attribution
Utility Scripts
| Script | Purpose |
find_todos.py | Find all TODO comments |
analyze_staleness.py | Git blame analysis |
generate_report.py | Generate markdown report |
generate_html_report.py | Generate interactive HTML report |
Example
User: "Find forgotten TODOs in this project"
- Run
find_todos.py .→ Finds 47 TODOs - Run
analyze_staleness.py .→ 12 are older than 1 year - Run
generate_report.py .→ Creates report with:- 12 ancient TODOs (>1 year)
- 8 stale TODOs (6-12 months)
- 27 recent TODOs (<6 months)
Sample output:
## 🔴 Ancient TODOs (>1 year) - 12 found
| File | Line | Age | Author | Content |
| ------------ | ---- | -------- | ------ | ------------------------ |
| src/utils.py | 42 | 847 days | @alice | TODO: optimize this loop |
| lib/auth.js | 156 | 623 days | @bob | FIXME: handle edge case |Configuration
Filter by patterns or paths:
# Only FIXME and BUG
python scripts/find_todos.py . --patterns FIXME,BUG
# Exclude vendor directories
python scripts/find_todos.py . --exclude "vendor/*,node_modules/*"
# Only show TODOs older than 6 months
python scripts/analyze_staleness.py . --min-age 180Related Skills
- codebase-onboarding — Understand codebase before cleanup
- incident-response-helper — Some TODOs may be related to incidents
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

