delegate-check
Skill509 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Review open delegations — what you handed off, to whom, its status, and the next useful nudge. Use when the user says 'what did I delegate', 'who owes me', 'check my handoffs', 'follow up with someone'. Not for prepping a meeting; use meeting-prep.
In this repository153 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .claude/plugins/compound-engineering/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/search-routing.mdcCursor rule
- anthropic-algorithmic-artSkill
- anthropic-brand-guidelinesSkill
- anthropic-doc-coauthoringSkill
- anthropic-docxSkill
- anthropic-frontend-designSkill
- anthropic-internal-commsSkill
- anthropic-mcp-builderSkill
- anthropic-pptxSkill
- anthropic-slack-gif-creatorSkill
- anthropic-theme-factorySkill
- anthropic-webapp-testingSkill
- anthropic-web-artifacts-builderSkill
- anthropic-xlsxSkill
- atlassian-setupSkill
- backup-nowSkill
- backup-restoreSkill
- backup-setupSkill
- calendar-setupSkill
- commitmentsSkill
- create-mcpSkill
- daily-planSkill
- daily-reviewSkill
- decision-logSkill
- dex-backlogSkill
- dex-doctorSkill
- dex-improveSkill
- dex-obsidian-setupSkill
- dex-rollbackSkill
- dex-updateSkill
- dex-whats-newSkill
- diff-profileSkill
- enable-semantic-searchSkill
- getting-startedSkill
- goal-backlogSkill
- google-workspace-setupSkill
- granola-setupSkill
- identity-snapshotSkill
- industry-truthsSkill
- initiative-kickoffSkill
- integrate-mcpSkill
- journalSkill
- manage-capabilitiesSkill
- meeting-closeoutSkill
- meeting-prepSkill
- ms-teams-setupSkill
- pipedrive-setupSkill
- pipeline-syncSkill
- process-meetingsSkill
- product-briefSkill
- project-healthSkill
- prompt-improverSkill
- relationship-radarSkill
- reviewSkill
- save-insightSkill
- scrapeSkill
- skill-scoreSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. About 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈16
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Run inline in the current conversation by default, so this work can see what the user has already discussed, decided, or settled this …
- Very specific: line 29
Read 03-Tasks/Tasks.md and recent notes in 00-Inbox/Meetings/.
- Distinctive: line 31
Look for plain-language patterns such as:
- Distinctive: line 39
Check related person and project pages when they add useful context.
- Distinctive: line 41
Do not count a general hope, discussion point, or completed promise as an open delegation.
- Distinctive: line 47
When two records disagree, show the disagreement plainly and ask which status is current.
- Distinctive: line 68
Keep healthy items brief. Spend attention where the user may need to act.
- Distinctive: line 79
Do not send a message or create a task without the user's approval.
- Distinctive: line 83
After the user confirms what changed:
- Distinctive: line 85
Update a Dex task through the normal task tools, not by hand-editing its checkbox
- Distinctive: line 86
Add a short status line to the relevant meeting or project note when that is the clearest source of truth
- Distinctive: line 88
If the owner or date changed, preserve the earlier context in the note
- Distinctive: line 92
Use a compact review:
- Distinctive: line 107
If nothing is open, say so plainly: "I found no open delegations in Tasks.md or recent meeting notes."
- Distinctive: line 111
Never guess that silence means progress or failure
- Distinctive: line 112
Keep the focus on outcomes, not activity
- Distinctive: line 116
Do not nag when the agreed date has not arrived and there is no sign of risk
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- Generated from `.claude/skills/delegate-check/SKILL.md` by `scripts/generate-agents-skills.py`. Do not edit. -->Execution mode
Run inline in the current conversation by default, so this work can see what the user has already discussed, decided, or settled this session. Do not fork merely because this skill was selected. Only run in the background when the user explicitly asks for a background run or the host has already obtained a specific background-work approval for this run.
Purpose
Give the user a clear view of work they have handed to other people without turning delegation into hovering. Find what is moving, what is waiting, and where a short follow-up would help.
When to Use
- The user asks what they are waiting on
- The user wants to review delegated work or team commitments
- A weekly planning or review conversation reveals unclear ownership
- A promised follow-up is approaching or overdue
Step 1: Gather Open Delegations
Read 03-Tasks/Tasks.md and recent notes in 00-Inbox/Meetings/.
Look for plain-language patterns such as:
- An owner or assignee who is not the user
- "Delegated to", "waiting on", "with", or "owned by"
- A person promising to send, review, decide, introduce, or deliver something
- A user task whose next step is to follow up with someone
- An open action item in a meeting note assigned to another person
Check related person and project pages when they add useful context. If semantic search is available, use it to catch commitments expressed without the exact words above.
Do not count a general hope, discussion point, or completed promise as an open delegation.
Step 2: Reconcile Duplicates
The same handoff may appear in both Tasks.md and a meeting note. Treat matching owner, outcome, and timing as one delegation, and keep links to both sources.
When two records disagree, show the disagreement plainly and ask which status is current. Do not silently choose one.
Step 3: Build the Review
For each open delegation, capture:
- What: the result the user handed off
- Who: the person responsible
- Handed off: the date or source meeting, when known
- Expected: the promised or useful check-in date, when known — read
waiting_on_dateon the person page for a wait,i_owe_dateonly for something the user still owes - Status: moving, waiting, due soon, overdue, or unclear. Overdue is only for something the user owes (
i_owe_dateor a task they own). A pastwaiting_on_dateis "waiting past the check-in" / nudge them, not overdue. A leftovernext_action_datehas no direction — do not mark it overdue. - Last touch: the latest relevant update
- Next nudge: one specific, proportionate follow-up
Present the items in this order:
- Overdue or blocked
- Due soon
- Waiting normally
- Status unclear
Keep healthy items brief. Spend attention where the user may need to act.
Step 4: Recommend the Next Nudge
A good nudge is short and easy to answer. Draft it in the user's normal tone and include the outcome or date that matters.
Examples:
- "How is the pricing review looking? I need the final call by Thursday to keep the launch on track."
- "Quick check: are you still able to send the notes this week, or should we reset the date?"
Do not send a message or create a task without the user's approval.
Step 5: Update the Record
After the user confirms what changed:
- Update a Dex task through the normal task tools, not by hand-editing its checkbox
- Add a short status line to the relevant meeting or project note when that is the clearest source of truth
- Mark a delegation complete only when the promised result is actually delivered or the user explicitly closes it
- If the owner or date changed, preserve the earlier context in the note
Output
Use a compact review:
## Delegations needing attention
- **Pricing review — Morgan**
- Expected: 2026-07-23 · Status: due soon
- Last touch: Agreed in the 2026-07-16 launch meeting
- Next nudge: Confirm whether Thursday still holds
## Waiting normally
- **Customer notes — Riley** · Expected next week · No action todayIf nothing is open, say so plainly: "I found no open delegations in Tasks.md or recent meeting notes."
Rules
- Never guess that silence means progress or failure
- Keep the focus on outcomes, not activity
- Distinguish work delegated by the user from work the user personally owes
- Name missing owners, dates, or status as unclear
- Use absolute dates
- Do not nag when the agreed date has not arrived and there is no sign of risk
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

