search-console-seo
Skill0 starsChanged 49 days agoMITView on GitHub
Technical SEO and Google Search Console for a site that is about to advertise — sitemap.xml, robots.txt, canonical, noindex for private pages, JSON-LD (FAQPage, AggregateRating) that matches visible content, honest user reviews for trust, Search Console verification, sitemap submission, reading the Page indexing report, requesting indexing, and linking Search Console with GA4 and Google Ads. Use for "SEO", "sitemap", "Search Console", "not indexed", "rich results", or trust/review sections.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- ad-assetsSkill
- conversion-trackingSkill
- google-growth-journeySkill
- google-ui-automationSkill
- growth-auditSkill
- pmax-campaignSkill
- tag-managerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Only public, indexable, canonical URLs.
- Distinctive: line 39
Only logged-in users who actually used that feature can review (check against a server-side record of usage, not a client flag).
- Very specific: line 49
Add a Domain property (sc-domain:example.com, DNS TXT verification) — covers http/https/www/subdomains in one.
- Distinctive: line 70
Verify in GSC → Settings → Associations: both GA4 and Ads should be listed.
- Very specific: line 74
Run ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/audit_site.py https://example.com — it fetches with a browser user-agent and checks robots, sitemap, …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Search Console & technical SEO
1. Site side (code)
sitemap.xml
- Only public, indexable, canonical URLs. Never pages with personal data (results, account, checkout). Write a test that asserts those paths are absent.
<lastmod>= real modification date. Faking "today" on every URL teaches Google to ignore it.- Served as
application/xml, valid XML (test with a parser).
robots.txt
Disallow:private paths (/account,/checkout, result pages with query data).Sitemap: https://domain/sitemap.xml.- Blocking AI crawlers (GPTBot, CCBot, Google-Extended…) is a policy choice; it does not affect Google Search or Ads.
User-agent: *rules do not apply to AdsBot; landing pages stay checkable by Ads.
Canonical — default to the URL without query string, so ?utm_source=… and filter
variants don't split into many URLs.
noindex — private pages get <meta name="robots" content="noindex">. Reuse that flag
elsewhere: it's the right switch for "don't send this page's title to analytics" too
(see conversion-tracking).
JSON-LD — structured data must describe what the visitor can see:
FAQPage: build the visible FAQ and the JSON-LD from the same array in code, so they can never disagree.AggregateRating: only when the page visibly shows the same rating and count, and only above a minimum count (e.g. ≥ 3). "5.0 from 1 review" looks bought, and marking up ratings the reader can't see is a manual-action risk.
Reviews that build trust (the honest version of "show testimonials"):
- Only logged-in users who actually used that feature can review (check against a server-side record of usage, not a client flag).
- One review per user per feature (unique index in the DB, not just app code).
- Moderation queue: new reviews are
pending; an admin approves/hides with a reason that is logged. Notify the admin immediately so reviewers don't wait for days. - Show abbreviated names ("Nguyen Van D."). Never seed fake reviews to fill the block — an empty state saying "no reviews yet" is better than six identical five-star quotes.
2. Search Console
- Add a Domain property (
sc-domain:example.com, DNS TXT verification) — covers http/https/www/subdomains in one. - Sitemaps → submit
https://example.com/sitemap.xml. Status must be Success with a discovered-page count close to the number of<loc>entries. - Pages (Page indexing) report — how to read it for a new domain:
- "Discovered – currently not indexed": Google knows the URL and hasn't crawled it. Normal for weeks on a young domain. Not a config error.
- "Duplicate, Google chose different canonical" on
sitemap.xmlitself: harmless. - "Crawled – not indexed": content quality/thinness signal; improve the page.
- URL inspection → Request indexing for the 5–10 most important landing pages (quota is roughly 10/day). The top search box needs a click, a short wait, then typing; dismiss the "Indexing requested" toast before inspecting the next URL.
3. Links
- GA4 ↔ Search Console: from GA4 Admin → Product links → Search Console links → Link → choose property → choose web stream → Submit. Requires being a verified owner in GSC.
- Google Ads ↔ Search Console: from Ads → Tools → Data manager → Search Console tile → Continue → enter site URL → Link. Links instantly if the same Google account owns the GSC property; otherwise it sends a request the owner approves in GSC → Settings → Associations. Search Console itself has no "link to Ads" button.
- Verify in GSC → Settings → Associations: both GA4 and Ads should be listed.
4. Before you call it done
Run ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/audit_site.py https://example.com — it fetches with a
browser user-agent and checks robots, sitemap, canonical, noindex on the private paths you
pass with --private, and JSON-LD presence.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

