audit-project
Skill0 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
Pre-release audit of a Telegram bot or Mini App, with or without TON — secrets scan, typecheck, lint and tests, Telegram-specific checks, then the security reviewer agents. Run before a release or any mainnet discussion.
- Reads credentials
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- woojubb/robotatheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- elfrost/ai-patchlabtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- MusserLab/lab-claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- luiseiman/dotforgetheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- josuecasanave/audit-projecttheir own version, first seen Sep 7, 2026
- eldermoraes/quarkus-agentic-scaffoldingtheir own version, first seen Jul 21, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- eldermoraes/quarkus-agentic-scaffolding★ 27same name
- woojubb/robota★ 19same name
- cogotemartinez/ai-second-brain-template★ 9same name
- luiseiman/dotforge★ 8same name
- MusserLab/lab-claude-skills★ 4same name
- elfrost/ai-patchlab★ 1same name
- stoffl6781/claude-skill★ 1same name
- josuecasanave/audit-project★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- add-paymentsSkill
- add-ton-connectSkill
- deploy-testnetSkill
- new-botSkill
- new-mini-appSkill
- telegram-botSkill
- telegram-devSkill
- telegram-launchSkill
- telegram-mini-appSkill
- telegram-paymentsSkill
- telegram-tonSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
Secrets scan: Search tracked files (not git-ignored ones such as .env) for bot tokens (\d{8,10}:[A-Za-z0-9_-]{35}), seed phrases, 64-hex …
- Very specific: line 15
Build and tests: Run the project's typecheck, lint and tests (package.json scripts, or pyproject.toml tooling such as ruff, mypy and …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Audit project
Work through these in order and report each result. Don't fix anything silently; list findings and ask before changing code.
- Secrets scan. Search tracked files (not git-ignored ones such as
.env) for bot tokens (\d{8,10}:[A-Za-z0-9_-]{35}), seed phrases, 64-hex private keys, API keys, and for.envorwallets.tomltracked by git (git ls-files). Check the built front-end bundle too. Report file and line; never print the secret value. - Build and tests. Run the project's typecheck, lint and tests (
package.jsonscripts, orpyproject.tomltooling such as ruff, mypy and pytest). - Telegram checks.
initDatavalidated on the server with anauth_datelimit; webhook checks its secret token;allowed_updatesmatches the handlers; handlers idempotent; 429 and 403 handled in broadcasts. - Payments (if present). Delegate to the
telegram-security-revieweragent. - Contracts (if
Acton.tomlexists).acton build,acton check,acton test --coverage(WSL on Windows). Then delegate to theton-security-revieweragent. - Summary. One table: area, status (passed, failed or skipped), top finding. Then go through the
telegram-launchchecklist for what automation can't check. End with a verdict: ready for release, ready for a human audit, or not ready. Never call anything "safe for mainnet".
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

