plan-work
Skill1 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when you plan a feature, a requirement or a milestone for an agent to do, or when you create, change, resume or keep a feature plan. Writes a Markdown plan that lists small, logical commits for one feature branch and one pull request.
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- juanbermudez/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- danielvm-git/bigpowerstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- ambroselittle/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- linellazatin/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- cristian-robert/claude-code-harnesstheir own version, first seen Sep 15, 2026
- Chrike/coding-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 4, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- danielvm-git/bigpowers★ 288same name
- cristian-robert/claude-code-harness★ 2same name
- Chrike/coding-agent-skills★ 1same name
- linellazatin/skills★ 1same name
- ambroselittle/agent-skills★ 0same name
- juanbermudez/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- apply-architectureSkill
- bootstrapSkill
- clarify-intentSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- map-workSkill
- releaseSkill
- tdd-loopSkill
- triageSkill
- write-adrSkill
- write-prSkill
- writing-checkSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
14
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Read feature-plans.md. Read the project plans, requirements and tasks that apply.
- Distinctive: line 15
Read the work that exists and the active plans.
- Very specific: line 16
Write the plan to .plans/<feature-slug>.md, or to the path that the project documents.
- Distinctive: line 18
Make sure that each acceptance criterion maps to planned work.
- Distinctive: line 20
When the implementation and the required checks are complete, remove the completed plan before you open the pull request.
- Distinctive: line 24
Use these headings. Add details only when they are necessary.
- Distinctive: line 71
If you cannot start subagents, do the steps one at a time in the order of this skill.
- Very specific: line 77
No issue: write none in the Issue field.
- Very specific: line 78
No branch: write not created in the Branch field.
- Distinctive: line 79
No automated checks: run the project checks locally if you can, and record the real result as evidence.
- Distinctive: line 86
Do not start without a verified claim.
- Distinctive: line 91
If this session mapped the issue, stop.
- Distinctive: line 93
Only plan, unless someone also asks you to do the work.
- Distinctive: line 94
Use one feature, one issue, one feature branch and one pull request.
- Distinctive: line 95
Do not tell the project which models, agents, languages, tools or repository hosts to use.
- Distinctive: line 96
Do not use a plan in place of the issue, the tests, the source code or the permanent documentation.
- Distinctive: line 97
Do not invent a status, a commit identifier, a test result or a decision.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Plan work
Turn an approved feature goal into a plan. Another agent must be able to do the plan without the original conversation.
Read feature-plans.md. Read the project plans, requirements and tasks that apply.
Steps
- Find the feature goal, the acceptance criteria, the non-goals, the constraints and the known facts. If a requirement that changes the plan is not clear, use
clarify-intent. - Read the work that exists and the active plans. Do not plan work again that is done or already in a plan.
- Write the plan to
.plans/<feature-slug>.md, or to the path that the project documents. Use the format below. - Divide the feature into the smallest increments that are complete and that a reviewer can review alone. Plan each increment as a logical conventional commit. Do not plan a fixed number of commits. For each increment, write its dependencies, its risks and how to verify it. Write full details only for the items that the known facts support. For the later items, write only the outcome. See small steps.
- Make sure that each acceptance criterion maps to planned work. Make sure that no item adds scope that nobody asked for.
- When you do the work or hand it over, compare the plan with the real commits and checks. Update the status, the evidence and the next action as the shared protocol tells you. After each commit, if its result shows a new fact, change the later items.
- When the implementation and the required checks are complete, remove the completed plan before you open the pull request. Do not remove a plan that is incomplete or blocked. Follow feature plans. Do not remove the plan only because all its items show as complete.
Plan format
Use these headings. Add details only when they are necessary.
# Feature: <name>
Status: PENDING
Issue: <reference or none>
Branch: <name or not created>
## Goal
## Requirements and acceptance criteria
## In scope
## Out of scope
## Dependencies and constraints
## Decisions and open questions
## Commit plan
### C01: <short outcome>
Status: PENDING
Depends on: none
Proposed commit: feat(scope): summary
Actual commit: none
Objective:
Work:
Verification:
Evidence: not yet run
## Final verification
## Handoff
Next action:
Blockers:
Risks:Each commit item must describe a change that has a purpose and a result that you can verify. Put the tests before the behavior changes, as TDD tells you. When you learn more, change the commit boundaries. Keep the proposed commits apart from the real commits.
Subagents
If you can start subagents, use them for the checks that do not depend on each other. In step 6, compare the plan with the issue, with the commits and with the check results at the same time, each in its own subagent. Give each subagent a brief that is complete without your context:
- The plan path and the plan text.
- The source for its comparison: the issue text, the list of commits on the branch, or the check results.
- The full text of step 6 and the status and evidence rules in the shared protocol.
- What to report, and a word limit, for example 300 words.
- This line: "Report to me only. Do not change the plan, commit, push, post, approve or merge."
Collect the reports. Check each difference that a report gives against its source before you change the plan. If you cannot find the difference in the source, do not change the plan for it, and say so. Then update the plan yourself.
If you cannot start subagents, do the steps one at a time in the order of this skill.
When a piece is missing
The steps expect an issue, a feature branch, automated checks and write access to the plan path. If a piece is missing, use its fallback below. In the plan or in your report, say which fallback you used and why.
- No issue: write
nonein theIssuefield. In step 1, take the goal and the acceptance criteria from the person who asked for the plan. If you cannot find them, ask. Do not invent them. - No branch: write
not createdin theBranchfield. Do the planning steps. Do not create the branch unless someone asked you to do the work. - No automated checks: run the project checks locally if you can, and record the real result as evidence. If you cannot run a check, record it as not run. A check that did not run is not a pass.
- You cannot write to the plan path: do not write the plan to a different path on your own. Give the plan in your report, say why you could not write it, and ask where to put it.
- The plan changed since you read it, for example because another agent edited it: follow step 5 in feature-plans.md.
Boundaries
- Read claims.md. Do not start without a verified claim.
- Stay inside the issue scope. Do not add work that the issue does not allow.
- Record a design risk in the plan only when stewardship says to analyze. Do not add that record for ordinary work.
- If this session mapped the issue, stop. A fresh session does the implementation. See work.md.
- Only plan, unless someone also asks you to do the work.
- Use one feature, one issue, one feature branch and one pull request. The branch can have many commits. The squash merge rule does not change.
- Do not tell the project which models, agents, languages, tools or repository hosts to use.
- Do not use a plan in place of the issue, the tests, the source code or the permanent documentation.
- Do not invent a status, a commit identifier, a test result or a decision.
- Obey the hard limits in safety.md.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

