exam
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Examine the human on the code they are about to push. Use when a push is blocked by vibecheck, or when the user asks to be vibechecked. Reads the outgoing diff, asks 2-4 multiple-choice questions about it via AskUserQuestion, grades them, and unlocks the push on a pass.
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dymchenkko/claude-study-agenttheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- LazyerIJ/self-clonetheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- devinat1/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 6, 2026
- kubilaiswf/claude-tutortheir own version, first seen Sep 3, 2026
- dull-bird/teach-me-skilltheir own version, first seen Jul 8, 2026
- jiangtao/skillstheir own version, first seen Jan 29, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- dull-bird/teach-me-skill★ 2same name
- dymchenkko/claude-study-agent★ 2same name
- LazyerIJ/self-clone★ 2same name
- devinat1/skills★ 1same name
- jiangtao/skills★ 1same name
- kubilaiswf/claude-tutor★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
Every blocked push prints the gate's absolute path on its last line.
- Very specific: line 42
Read .vibecheck.toml if it exists: questions (default 3) and pass (all | majority, default all).
- Very specific: line 47
Follow "$GATE" --guide. In short: find the 2–4 *ideas* the change rests on and test what follows from them.
- Very specific: line 53
Ask all questions in a single AskUserQuestion call — one per questions entry.
- Distinctive: line 67
Do not reveal the correct answer, hint at it, or react to answers until everything is in.
- Distinctive: line 83
Never answer for the human, and never issue a receipt they didn't earn.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
vibecheck: the exam (Claude Code)
An agent wrote this code; the human is about to put their name on it. Your job is to find out
whether they understand what they're shipping. You are the examiner, not the candidate —
never answer, hint, or narrow the options. AskUserQuestion is the only way to collect an
answer here.
This file is only the Claude Code delivery wrapper. The instructions that decide whether the exam is any good — what to ask, the altitude, fair distractors, how to grade, the one rule — live in the shared guide. Read it before writing questions and follow it:
"$GATE" --guide0. Find the gate
Every blocked push prints the gate's absolute path on its last line. Use that. If you're run
without a block message (the user just asked to be vibechecked), try
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/gate.sh", and failing that:
ls ~/.claude/plugins/*/vibecheck*/hooks/gate.sh 2>/dev/null || find ~/.claude -name gate.sh -path '*vibecheck*' 2>/dev/null | head -11. Read the diff
"$GATE" --diffThis is exactly the diff the gate hashes — do not substitute your own git diff, or the
receipt won't match and the push stays blocked. If it's empty, say so and stop. Use Grep to read
surrounding code (callers, etc.) where a question needs it.
Read .vibecheck.toml if it exists: questions (default 3) and pass (all | majority,
default all).
2. Write the questions
Follow "$GATE" --guide. In short: find the 2–4 ideas the change rests on and test what
follows from them; state the change plainly and make them reason out the consequence; every
distractor actually wrong and distinguishable; never quiz absent code or line-level trivia.
3. Administer via AskUserQuestion
Ask all questions in a single AskUserQuestion call — one per questions entry. The human
answers; you cannot.
Every question carries the way out. Make the last option of every question a plain, first-class escape — same wording each time:
- …(the substantive answers)…
- Skip the vibecheck — push without answering
That leaves three substantive options per question (one correct, two wrong — the guide's
rules apply to those). The point: the human can bail at the very first question, or any
question, without reading the rest. If they pick the skip option on any question, that is a
skip — honor it immediately (--skip) and do not grade.
Do not reveal the correct answer, hint at it, or react to answers until everything is in.
4. Grade and record
Score per pass (all = every question; majority = more than half). For how to handle a
fail, a skip, or pushback, follow the guide — be helpful on a fail, take a skip at face value,
believe them when a question was unfair.
- Pass:
"$GATE" --pass, then retry the push and report the score plainly. - Skip (picked from the exam, or said at any point):
"$GATE" --skip, immediately, no guilt-tripping. Then retry the push. - Fail: issue no receipt; explain what the code actually does, name the hunks worth reading, and offer the three doors (try again / skip / go read).
The one rule
Never answer for the human, and never issue a receipt they didn't earn. You could forge it — you have a shell — which is exactly why it matters that you don't. See the guide's closing lines.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

