plan-writing
Skill1 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub
Subagent-side, preloaded into the planner. How to write an implementation plan for a complex or batched todo — scope, one-test steps, layers, risks, and the plan template.
11 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sid-lakhani/agents-configtheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- xfstudio/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- xenitV1/Antigravity-Workflowstheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- vudovn/ag-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- vudovn/antigravity-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcptheir own version, first seen Aug 21, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use intelligent-routing, nextjs-react-expert and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SKB3002Skillintelligent-routing
Automatic agent selection and intelligent task routing. Analyzes user requests and automatically selects the best specialist agent(s) without requiring explicit user mentions.
Also in 5 projects that use this
SKB3002Skillnextjs-react-expert
React and Next.js performance optimization from Vercel Engineering. Use when building React components, optimizing performance, eliminating waterfalls, reducing bundle size, reviewing code for performance issues, or implementing server/client-side optimizations.
Also in 3 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillrust-pro
Master Rust 1.75+ with modern async patterns, advanced type system
Also in 5 projects that use this
jornalistainclusivoSkilldesign-spec
How to author a DESIGN.md file — the machine-readable design-token + human-rationale format that must exist before any UI is built. YAML front-matter token schema (colors, typography, spacing, rounded, components), type system, token references, and canonical section order.
Also in 3 projects that use this
zzfancitizenSkillverify-changes
Verify code changes do not break the project by running tests, linter checks, and import validation. Use after making any code changes, editing Python files, modifying imports, updating dependencies, or refactoring.
Also in 3 projects that use this
VercelSkillweb-design-guidelines
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".
Also in 5 projects that use this
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- vudovn/ag-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- vudovn/antigravity-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- xenitV1/Antigravity-Workflows★ 130same name
- VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp★ 28same name
- Fandry96/k3-agentic-skills★ 27same name
- xfstudio/skills★ 9same name
- SKB3002/agenthub★ 4same name
- ai4brands-design/claude-skills★ 2same name
- sid-lakhani/agents-config★ 2same name
- jornalistainclusivo/jinc-skills★ 1same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adversarial-reviewSkill
- clean-architectureSkill
- decision-recordingSkill
- design-system-checkSkill
- dispatch-handoffSkill
- feature-branchingSkill
- finding-dispositionSkill
- git-recoverySkill
- gotcha-recordingSkill
- human-checkpointSkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- pr-createSkill
- simplicity-ladderSkill
- spec-writingSkill
- subagent-contractSkill
- subagent-dispatchSkill
- tdd-loopSkill
- update-toolkitSkill
- wiki-updateSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
When dispatched as planner, write the plan to .handoff/<slug>-plan.md (overwriting any prior version) and return the path plus a short …
- Very specific: line 65
When re-dispatched after a two-strike failure, overwrite .handoff/<slug>-plan.md with a fundamentally different approach, naming the failed …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Plan Writing
When dispatched as planner, write the plan to .handoff/<slug>-plan.md (overwriting any prior version) and return the path plus a short summary. When asked for a plan in conversation, output it directly.
Read first
docs/wiki/entities/<slug>.md(ordocs/wiki/concepts/<slug>.mdfor[infra]) — decompose its## Behaviorcases.docs/wiki/requirements.md— relevant requirement section.docs/wiki/architecture.md—## Stack,## Layers,## Testing strategy.docs/wiki/gotchas.md— known failure points.docs/wiki/commands.md— verbatim test command and architecture check.- One similar entity's implementation to mirror layout and naming.
Plan structure
# Plan: <slug>
## Goal
<one paragraph — what shipping this means in observable terms>
## Behavior cases covered
- <slug> B1: <case text, copied from the entity page>
## Approach
<2-4 sentences — approach, one-line justification vs alternatives, and what existing code/stdlib/dependency it reuses. On retry, name the prior failed approach and why this one is fundamentally different.>
## Steps
1. <action> (case: B1; layer: <layer>; touches: path)
2. ...
## Files to touch (estimate)
- path/to/file — layer — change description
## New dependencies between layers
- <from layer> → <to layer>: <why>, and the port/interface it goes through — or "none"
## Risks / unknowns
- <risk> → mitigation
- <case no subagent can verify> → command only the conductor can run
## Out of scope
- <explicit non-goal>
## Test command
<verbatim from docs/wiki/commands.md>Sizing rule
Each step must be small enough that one failing test drives it (step N → test N → green N). Split any step that covers multiple Behavior cases or more than three sub-changes, and order steps so each can fail Red independently.
Layers
Assign every new file a boundary from architecture.md § Layers (none under the flat shape). Route any need the table forbids (an inner boundary reaching an outer one, a slice reaching another's internals) through a port or public API and list it under ## New dependencies between layers. If the task cannot fit the declared boundaries, stop and report (changing the shape or a boundary requires a human decision and an ADR).
Update on retry
When re-dispatched after a two-strike failure, overwrite .handoff/<slug>-plan.md with a fundamentally different approach, naming the failed approach and why the new one avoids that failure mode while keeping ## Behavior cases covered identical.
Anti-patterns
- Pseudocode in steps (name actions and files, not code).
- Inventing requirements (if a Behavior case is missing or ambiguous, stop and report).
- Editing wiki pages.
- Over-building (unforced files, abstractions, or dependencies when existing code/stdlib/platform suffices).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

