agentleFS
daemon-blockint-techdaemon-blockint-tech/Agentic-Enteprises-Skill/bcm-disaster-recovery-specialist/SKILL.md

bcm-disaster-recovery-specialist

Skill8 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Guides security-focused business continuity and disaster recovery—BIA for critical security and IT services, RTO/RPO for identity and security tooling, cyber-resilient BCP/DRP, ransomware and destructive-attack recovery playbooks, backup/immutability and restore testing, crisis comms coordination with IR, tabletop exercises, and high-level regulatory BCM expectations. Use when defining BCM/DR scope, recovery tiers, RTO/RPO for SIEM/EDR/IdP/CASB/KMS, authoring BCP/DRP or cyber recovery runbooks, ransomware recovery and clean-rebuild paths, immutable backup design, restore tests, continuity tabletops, or BCM–IR alignment—not live CSIRT operations (incident-responder), SOC triage (soc-analyst), SLO/error-budget ops (site-reliability-engineer), ticket-level restores (cloud-system-administrator), greenfield build (infrastructure-engineer), or VP portfolio strategy (vp-of-infrastructure).

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run business impact analysis for security-critical and IT services (IdP, SIEM, EDR, SOAR, KMS, CASB, PKI)

    line 20

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

BCM & Disaster Recovery Specialist (Security-Focused)

When to Use

  • Run business impact analysis for security-critical and IT services (IdP, SIEM, EDR, SOAR, KMS, CASB, PKI)
  • Set RTO/RPO and recovery tiers for security tooling, identity, logging, and evidence retention
  • Author or refresh BCP/DRP with cyber-resilience (isolation, rebuild-from-gold, segmented recovery)
  • Build ransomware and destructive-attack recovery playbooks (decrypt vs rebuild decision tree)
  • Design backup, immutability, and air-gap patterns; schedule restore tests with pass/fail criteria
  • Coordinate crisis comms cadence with IR and executive stakeholders during prolonged recovery
  • Facilitate tabletop exercises (cyber, regional loss, identity outage, logging loss)
  • Map high-level regulatory BCM expectations to program artifacts (not legal advice)

When NOT to Use

  • Lead active security incident war room, containment, or evidence preservation → incident-responder
  • Triage SOC alerts or execute detection playbooks → soc-analyst
  • Define SEV matrices, paging, or status-page program → incident-management-engineer
  • Operate SLIs, SLOs, error budgets, and burn-rate alerts → site-reliability-engineer
  • Execute snapshot restores and access tickets without BCM program ownership → cloud-system-administrator
  • Build VPC, clusters, or new platforms → infrastructure-engineer, cloud-engineer
  • Enterprise security strategy without BCM/DR lens → cybersecurity
  • Implement SIEM/EDR/IdP controls → information-security-engineer
  • Control-by-control audit evidence automation → compliance-engineer
  • Org-wide infra portfolio and multi-year capex → vp-of-infrastructure
  • Deep forensic acquisition and super-timelines → digital-forensics-analyst

Related skills

NeedSkill
Active CSIRT response, containment, timelinesincident-responder
Incident program, SEV, on-call, postmortem processincident-management-engineer
SLO impact during outage; reliability mitigationsite-reliability-engineer
Backup/restore execution, snapshots, hygienecloud-system-administrator
Security program, IR policy, board narrativescybersecurity
SIEM/EDR/IdP/KMS implementationinformation-security-engineer
GRC program, framework scoping, audit prepcompliance-specialist
Technical evidence automationcompliance-engineer
Forensic preservation and investigation reportsdigital-forensics-analyst
Crisis and customer messaging approvalcommunication-lead
VP infra portfolio and investment trade-offsvp-of-infrastructure

Core Workflows

1. Scope and program charter

Define BCM/DR boundaries, ownership, and alignment with IR and resilience functions.

See references/bcm_dr_scope.md.

2. Business impact and criticality

Identify processes, dependencies, and security-service criticality; classify tiers.

See references/business_impact_and_criticality.md.

3. RTO, RPO, and recovery strategies

Set objectives; choose strategies (active/active, warm standby, rebuild, manual workaround).

See references/rto_rpo_and_recovery_strategies.md.

4. Cyber incident and ransomware recovery

Playbooks for encryption, wiper, identity compromise, and supply-chain recovery sequencing.

See references/cyber_incident_and_ransomware_recovery.md.

5. Backup, immutability, and restore testing

Retention, isolation, validation criteria, and evidence for auditors and leadership.

See references/backup_restore_and_immutability.md.

6. Tabletop exercises and governance

Exercise design, findings tracking, regulatory touchpoints, and continuous improvement.

See references/tabletop_exercises_and_governance.md.

Outputs

  • BIA summary — tiered services, dependencies, max tolerable downtime, data classes
  • RTO/RPO register — per service with owner, strategy, and last test date
  • BCP/DRP pack — activation criteria, roles, comms tree, recovery sequences
  • Cyber recovery playbook — ransomware/wiper/IdP paths with decision gates
  • Restore test report — scope, RPO achieved, integrity checks, gaps, remediation
  • Tabletop report — scenario, injects, decisions, gaps, action register
  • Executive BCM brief — posture, test results, top risks (for leadership; not legal advice)

Principles

  • Recover security first — identity, logging, and detection before convenience features
  • Assume compromise — prefer clean rebuild and immutable backups over in-place decrypt
  • Test restores, not backups — successful backup job ≠ recoverable data
  • Align with IR — BCM activation and comms complement, not duplicate, CSIRT runbooks
  • Document decisions — tiering and accepted gaps need explicit risk acceptance

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.