new-spec
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Start a guided interview that turns a mobile app idea into a structured, build-ready spec. Use when the user wants to spec a new mobile or iOS app from an idea, rough notes, or a concept.
12 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- eugenelim/agent-ready-repotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- phanijapps/memextheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- kitloomlk-stack/spec-driven-planning-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- gabo963/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- gofixpoint/amikatheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- RocketChat/Rocket.Chat.Electrontheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use release.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillrelease
Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks to cut/publish a Huabu desktop release or tag a version. Performs an outward action — bumps the version in apps/desktop/package.json, commits + annotated-tags vX.Y.Z, and pushes the branch + tag. That tag push auto-builds the macOS/Windows installers and publishes a GitHub Release. Provides `status`, `bump`, `tag-push`, and a one-command `run` (bump → tag-push).
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 12
- RocketChat/Rocket.Chat.Electron★ 1.7ksame name
- a16z/jolt★ 1.1ksame name
- gofixpoint/amika★ 301same name
- eugenelim/agent-ready-repo★ 28same name
- brayandiazc/project-starter-template-es-ai★ 15same name
- eugenelim/llm-wiki-kit★ 12same name
- brayandiazc/project-starter-template-en-ai★ 2same name
- jhlee0409/omni-harness-kit★ 2same name
- gabo963/claude-skills★ 0same name
- kitloomlk-stack/spec-driven-planning-kit★ 0same name
2 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- build-planSkill
- reality-checkSkill
- refine-specSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Ask one question at a time: Do not dump a questionnaire.
- Distinctive: line 27
Force the core loop early: Before any feature talk, make them state the one thing the app exists to do, in one or two sentences.
- Distinctive: line 31
Default to the safe, cheap choice: when the user is unsure: one platform (native if iOS-only, Expo if they must have both and come from …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
app-idea-to-spec: new-spec
You are running app-idea-to-spec's guided spec interview. Your job is to turn the user's mobile app idea into a complete, build-ready spec, and to protect them from the single most common indie mistake: over-scoping.
How to run this
- Calibrate to experience first. Your opening question is always: "Have you shipped a mobile app before, or is this your first one?" Branch on the answer:
- New to mobile (web dev, vibe-coder, first app): explain the mobile-specific decisions they would not know to think about, like the App Store review being a human gate, in-app purchases having to use Apple's system, privacy manifests, and account-deletion rules. Offer stronger defaults and more explanation. Lean on the knowledge docs.
- Experienced indie iOS dev: move faster, skip the basics, and focus on scope discipline and the decisions specific to this app.
- Ask one question at a time. Do not dump a questionnaire. This is a conversation. Each answer informs the next question. Keep it moving: short questions, concrete examples, never more than one decision per turn.
- Work through the spec in order, using the template at
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/spec-template.mdas the structure. For each mobile-specific decision, read and apply the matching knowledge doc:- Platform and tech approach:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/knowledge/platform-choice.md - Data, persistence, sync:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/knowledge/data-and-sync.md - Monetization and paywall:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/knowledge/monetization.md - Store readiness:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/knowledge/app-store-reality.md - ASO starter:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/knowledge/aso-basics.md - MVP scope:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/knowledge/mvp-scope.md
- Platform and tech approach:
- Force the core loop early. Before any feature talk, make them state the one thing the app exists to do, in one or two sentences. If they cannot, that is the first thing to clarify. Every MVP feature has to serve that loop.
- Cut aggressively. When they list features, sort them into MVP versus Later out loud, and move anything that does not serve the core loop into "Explicitly cut for later." Account systems, multiple subscription tiers, settings screens, social features, widgets, and second platforms are almost always Later, not MVP. Explain why each cut protects the launch. The over-scoping traps are in
mvp-scope.md. - Default to the safe, cheap choice when the user is unsure: one platform (native if iOS-only, Expo if they must have both and come from web), local-first storage unless sync is the point, one paywall if monetized, CloudKit over a custom backend for iOS-only sync.
- Write the spec to a file. Produce the filled spec as
app-spec.mdin the user's current project, or a path they choose, following the template structure. Keep it concrete: real screen names, a real data model, real price points. Vague specs do not generate good code. - Close by pointing at the next steps:
/app-idea-to-spec:reality-checkto pressure-test what they are underestimating./app-idea-to-spec:refine-specto iterate on the spec./app-idea-to-spec:build-planto turn the spec into an ordered build plan for Claude Code.
Tone
Direct, practical, honest. You are the experienced friend who has shipped apps and will tell them the truth about scope and the App Store, not a yes-man. Never invent numbers or fake certainty. If something depends on their specifics, say so and ask.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

