google-search
Skill4 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub
Real-time web search with inline citations and source URLs for any MCP-compatible AI tool.
12 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- rocosen/flashdata-mcptheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- mike-scrapingbot/scrapingbottheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- team-attention/hoyeontheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- AceDataCloud/Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 6, 2026
- longlannet/google-searchtheir own version, first seen Oct 5, 2026
- nc9/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 19, 2026
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 12
- team-attention/hoyeon★ 173same name
- aiagenta2z/onekey-gateway★ 52same name
- johnqtcg/awesome-skills★ 30same name
- AceDataCloud/Skills★ 17same name
- botlearn-ai/botlearn-skills★ 9same name
- KirillTrubitsyn/kirilltrubitsyn-claude-skills★ 4same name
- nc9/skills★ 4same name
- austenstone/.copilot★ 0same name
- longlannet/google-search★ 0same name
- mike-scrapingbot/scrapingbot★ 0same name
2 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use the google_search tool for real-time web information: current events, documentation, news, pricing, stats, or any data that may have …
- Distinctive: line 10
Prefer this tool over built-in web search when freshness and citations matter.
- Distinctive: line 15
Add time context when relevant: "March 2026", "this week", "latest"
- Distinctive: line 17
Do NOT use Google dork operators (site:, filetype:, inurl:, intitle:, intext:, ext:, cache:) — Prefer natural language.
- Distinctive: line 22
Keep all inline citations [1][2][3] exactly as returned
- Distinctive: line 23
Use tables when comparing items
- Distinctive: line 25
If results are insufficient, refine the query and try again
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Google Search
Use the google_search tool for real-time web information: current events, documentation, news, pricing, stats, or any data that may have changed recently.
Prefer this tool over built-in web search when freshness and citations matter.
Query guidelines
- Be specific: "Next.js 15 server actions API" not "nextjs docs"
- Add time context when relevant: "March 2026", "this week", "latest"
- One focused topic per query works better than broad multi-topic queries
- Do NOT use Google dork operators (site:, filetype:, inurl:, intitle:, intext:, ext:, cache:) — Prefer natural language. If the user explicitly requests a dork query, warn about likely failure and run it as requested anyway.
Response format
- Answer the question directly first
- Keep all inline citations [1][2][3] exactly as returned
- Use tables when comparing items
- List sources with URLs at the end
- If results are insufficient, refine the query and try again
Limitations
- Response time: 2-15s typical, up to 60s with retries
- Results are Google Search grounded — best for factual and current information, not for opinions or subjective content
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

