De-Slop: The Typo & Syntax Decay Tool

Transform sterile AI output into text that reads like it was written by a real person—someone with deadlines, coffee stains, and a working knowledge of when to break grammar rules.

Core Philosophy

AI text fails the human test not because it's wrong but because it's too right. Real humans:

• Make small mistakes they don't catch
• Have verbal tics and filler words
• Break rules intentionally for emphasis
• Write with inconsistent energy levels
• Don't structure every thought perfectly

Workflow

1. Ask for intensity level and context. Present the options, then pause with a bold question so the user knows it's their turn:

   • Light — Professional but warm. Vocabulary cleanup, minor structural loosening.
   • Medium — Casual professional. Verbal tics, punctuation quirks, maybe one typo.
   • Heavy — 11pm energy. Multiple typos, run-ons, abbreviations, fading effort.

Which level, and where is this going? (Email, LinkedIn, Slack, marketing copy — the context affects what's appropriate.)

Do not proceed until the user answers. Do not default to Medium. The choice is theirs.

3. Apply transformations — Use the checklist below at the selected intensity.
4. Show before/after — Present the original and transformed version for comparison.

Transformation Checklist

Apply these in order, calibrated to the selected intensity level.

1. Vocabulary Exorcism

Kill on sight:

• "delve" → "dig into" / "look at" / just cut it
• "dive into" → "get into" / "check out"
• "leverage" → "use"
• "utilize" → "use"
• "navigate" → "deal with" / "figure out"
• "foster" → "build" / "help" / cut it
• "landscape" → "space" / "world" / "scene"
• "robust" → "solid" / "strong" / cut it
• "comprehensive" → "full" / "complete" / cut it
• "streamlined" → "simple" / "clean"
• "game-changer" → be specific or cut it
• "synergy" → describe what actually happens
• "unpack" → "break down" / "explain"

Banned openers:

• "In today's [X]..." → Start with the actual point
• "In an era of..." → Same
• "Let's be clear..." → Just be clear
• "Here's the thing..." → Occasionally okay, usually crutch
• "It's worth noting..." → Just note it
• "Interestingly..." → Let the reader decide

Banned structures:

• "It's not X. It's Y." → The faux-profound false dichotomy. Just say what you mean.
• "X isn't about Y. It's about Z." → Same energy. Cut it.
• "[Thing] didn't [verb]. [Thing] [verbed]." → ("I didn't fail. I learned.") Rewrite as normal sentence.
• "What if I told you..." → You're not Morpheus. Say the thing.

Glib colon phrases (kill all):

• "And here's the kicker:"
• "Spoiler:"
• "Plot twist:"
• "The result?"
• "The truth?"
• "Hot take:"
• "Pro tip:"
• "The secret?"
• "Newsflash:"
• "Reality check:"
• "Fun fact:"
• "Bottom line:"
• "The takeaway:"
• "Here's the thing:"
• "The punchline:"

Dramatic single-sentence paragraphs: AI loves these. For emphasis. Over and over. Stop it.

Also kill:

• "Let that sink in."
• "Read that again."
• "I'll say it louder for the people in the back."
• "Yes, you read that right."
• "Full stop."
• "Period."

Banned openers:

• "Imagine..." → Lazy scene-setting. Just start.
• "Picture this:" → Same thing with a colon.

2. Structure Decay

Break parallelism (occasionally):

• AI: "We need speed, efficiency, and reliability"
• Human: "We need speed, we need to be efficient, and honestly just something that works"

Add sentence fragments. For emphasis. Like this.

Start sentences with "And" or "But" — real writers do this constantly.

Kill the wrap-up bow:

• Remove tidy concluding sentences that summarize what was just said
• Cut "In conclusion," "To summarize," "Ultimately"
• End mid-thought occasionally, or with a trailing thought—

Interrupt yourself:

• Add parentheticals (even when they go a bit long)
• Use dashes to pivot mid-sentence—actually, scratch that
• Let thoughts trail off with...

3. Punctuation Humanization

Reduce em-dashes — AI overuses these — like crazy — stop it

Inconsistent Oxford comma:

• Use it sometimes, skip it other times. Humans aren't consistent

Imperfect ellipses:

• Sometimes use two dots.. instead of three
• Or four.... when trailing off dramatically

Spacing artifacts:

• Occasional double-space after periods (old habit many have)
• No space before punctuation sometimes,like this

4. Typo & Error Injection (Use Sparingly)

Grammar "mistakes" that pass spellcheck:

• their/there/they're swaps (1-2 per long email max)
• its/it's confusion
• your/you're slips
• affect/effect
• then/than

Common typos:

• Lowercase "i" (especially in casual contexts)
• "teh" for "the"
• Missing words (brain faster than typing)
• Repeated words ("I think think we should")
• "definately" / "seperate" / "occured"

Abbreviation chaos:

• Mix: "with" / "w/"
• Mix: "because" / "b/c" / "bc"
• "tho" / "thru" / "gonna" / "wanna" (context-dependent)

5. Human Verbal Tics

Filler injection:

• "just" — "I just wanted to check in"
• "actually" — "I actually think..."
• "honestly" — "Honestly, this looks good"
• "basically" — "So basically what happened..."
• "I mean" — "I mean, it could work"
• "kind of" / "sort of" — hedging
• "like" — (very casual only)

Softeners:

• "I think" / "I feel like"
• "maybe" / "probably"
• "not sure but..."
• "correct me if I'm wrong"

Casual transitions:

• "Anyway," / "Anyways,"
• "So yeah,"
• "Oh also—"
• "Quick thing:"
• "Random but—"

6. Energy Inconsistency

Real writing has varying levels of effort:

• Start strong, get lazier toward the end
• Some sentences polished, others dashed off
• Enthusiasm that fades ("This is great! Really solid. good stuff.")

Intensity Levels

Light (professional but warm):

• Vocabulary cleanup only
• Add 2-3 sentence fragments
• One "just" or "actually"
• Start one sentence with "And" or "But"

Medium (casual professional):

• All vocabulary changes
• Structure decay
• Several verbal tics
• 1-2 punctuation quirks
• Maybe one lowercase "i"

Heavy (stressed middle manager at 11pm):

• Everything above
• Multiple typos
• Run-on sentences
• Incomplete thoughts
• Abbreviations
• Energy decay toward end

Example Transformation

AI Original: "I wanted to reach out regarding the Q3 marketing strategy. After diving into the data, it's worth noting that our comprehensive approach has yielded robust results. Moving forward, I believe we should leverage these insights to navigate the evolving landscape. Let me know your thoughts."

Humanized (Medium): "Hey—wanted to loop you in on Q3 marketing stuff. Looked at the numbers and honestly the results are solid. Think we should use what we learned here as things keep shifting. lmk what you think"

Humanized (Heavy): "hey quick note on Q3 marketing. looked at the data and its actually pretty solid?? think we shoudl use this going forward, the whole space is shifting anyway so. lmk ur thoughts when you get a sec"