agentleFS
d4rkwinzd4rkwinz/agy-plugin/skills/agy/SKILL.md

agy

Skill1 starsChanged 25 days agoMITView on GitHub

Delegate bulk work and second opinions to Antigravity (agy).

10 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use codex.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • engtySkill

    codex

    Use when the user asks to run Codex CLI (codex exec, codex resume) or references OpenAI Codex for code analysis, refactoring, or automated editing

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Never trust a self-reported "done".

    line 55
  2. Distinctive:

    Transcripts: treat flagged-unclear passages as unverified.

    line 63

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

agy

Hand work to Google's Antigravity CLI (agy, running Gemini) and keep the judgment here. You stay the conductor: you own requirements, verification, and the final call. agy is the executor.

Read references/invariants.md before your first agy call in a session. It carries the flag rules that a plausible-looking invocation gets silently wrong — the failure mode is a confident wrong answer, not an error, so guessing the syntax is the expensive mistake here.

When to use

Delegate when the offloaded volume clearly exceeds the cost of specifying the task, the round trip, and verifying the result. Bulk, repetitive, or parallel work qualifies. A two-line edit does not — doing it yourself is cheaper.

Also use it for things this agent cannot do at all: hearing audio, watching video, and getting a genuinely independent second opinion from a different model family.

Operations

operationwhenhow
setupfirst run, or agy misbehavingreferences/setup.md
reviewbefore commit or mergereferences/review.md
delegatebulk build, scaffolding, testsreferences/delegate.md
researchmulti-source web questionsreferences/research.md
mediaaudio, video, imagesreferences/media.md

Two rules that decide whether this pays off

Ask for a digest, never raw output. Close every read/analysis prompt with an explicit contract — "Output ONLY 5–8 bullets, no file contents." This is the whole cost saving.

Never re-read what agy already handled. Ingest the digest and move on. Re-reading the files puts back exactly the cost you just removed.

Verification gates

Never trust a self-reported "done".

  • Writes: confirm with rtk proxy git status (or git status if RTK is not installed) that files actually changed. Run write tasks on a dedicated branch.
  • Review findings: corroborate each one against the real code before acting. Cross-model agreement is a strong signal; disagreement means look closer.
  • Research citations: open the URLs. agy can present parametric knowledge as a sourced fact.
  • Transcripts: treat flagged-unclear passages as unverified. Read the timestamp slice before relying on any load-bearing figure or quote.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.