system-design
Skill17 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub
Designs and reviews production software systems using requirements, SLOs, capacity estimates, service and data boundaries, consistency, scaling, reliability, security, observability, cost, and migration plans. Use for system design, architecture review, scalability, capacity planning, high availability, multi-tenancy, cell-based or cellular architecture, deployment stamps, technical design documents, or end-to-end production architecture.
64 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ragna-ai/ragna-studiotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mustafarslan/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- DaraBoth/skilljmskilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- reddygopalkrishna/developer-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codejunkie99/system-design-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use data-pipelines, caching and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
YepAPISkilldata-pipelines
ETL patterns, cron scheduling, queue-based processing, and batch jobs with Inngest/BullMQ.
Also in 3 projects that use this
wpankSkillcaching
Caching strategies, invalidation, eviction policies, HTTP caching, distributed caching, and anti-patterns. Use when designing cache layers, choosing eviction policies, debugging stale data, or optimizing read-heavy workloads.
Also in 3 projects that use this
mmondoraSkillinfrastructure-as-code
Infrastructure as Code with Terraform and Pulumi. State management, modularity, drift detection, secrets handling. Use when provisioning cloud resources, writing Terraform/Pulumi modules, or managing infrastructure configuration.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ayudaySkillautoplan
Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, and eng review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. Surfaces taste decisions (close approaches, borderline scope, codex disagreements) at a final approval gate. One command, fully reviewed plan out. Use when asked to "auto review", "autoplan", "run all reviews", "review this plan automatically", or "make the decisions for me". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan file and wants to run the full review gauntlet without answering 15-30 intermediate questions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
mjunaidcaSkillkubernetes
Production-grade Kubernetes manifests and debugging for containerized applications. This skill should be used when users ask to deploy to Kubernetes, create K8s manifests, containerize for K8s, set up Deployments/Services/Jobs/StatefulSets/CronJobs, create namespaces with resource quotas, set up multi-team isolation, configure ResourceQuota/ LimitRange, secure with RBAC (ServiceAccount, Role, RoleBinding), configure init containers (model download, db wait, migrations), set up sidecars (logging, metrics), or debug pods (CrashLoopBackOff, logs, exec, describe, events). Auto-detects from Dockerfile/code, generates hardened manifests with educational comments. CKAD-aligned.
Also in 3 projects that use this
harrissohail6Skilldatabase-design
Database schema design and SQL best practices. Use when designing tables, writing queries, or optimizing database performance.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions64 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 64
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- wondelai/skills★ 2.6ksame name
- ninehills/skills★ 280same name
- kid-sid/claude-spellbook★ 190same name
- NoobyGains/godmode★ 118same name
- proyecto26/system-design-skills★ 118same name
- ftvision/system-design-skill★ 37same name
- nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection★ 33same name
- pinchen147/system-design-skill★ 32same name
- s-hiraoku/synapse-a2a★ 17same name
54 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository53 other files it gives its agents.
- agents-sdkSkill
- agent-workflowSkill
- api-designSkill
- aws-iamSkill
- bash-shell-scriptingSkill
- cicd-github-actionsSkill
- cloudflare-email-serviceSkill
- cloudflareSkill
- cloudflare-waf-authorSkill
- cloudflare-workers-authorSkill
- cloud-platformsSkill
- codebase-security-auditSkill
- containers-orchestrationSkill
- core-engineeringSkill
- database-postgresqlSkill
- databricksSkill
- data-engineeringSkill
- distributed-transactionsSkill
- documentation-standardsSkill
- domain-driven-designSkill
- durable-objectsSkill
- frontend-engineeringSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- go-rust-systemsSkill
- iam-security-advisorSkill
- independent-verificationSkill
- infrastructure-iacSkill
- kubernetes-containersSkill
- kubernetes-operator-developmentSkill
- mcp-developmentSkill
- memory-architectureSkill
- multi-perspective-reviewSkill
- networking-transportSkill
- observabilitySkill
- oktaSkill
- pdf-exportSkill
- python-developmentSkill
- reactflow-architecture-diagramsSkill
- sandbox-sdkSkill
- scripting-automationSkill
- security-testingSkill
- service-resilienceSkill
- single-file-dashboardSkill
- skills-compositionSkill
- skills-continuous-improvementSkill
- snowflakeSkill
- typescript-javascriptSkill
- web-perfSkill
- web-research-kb-refreshSkill
- workers-best-practicesSkill
- workload-identitySkill
- wranglerSkill
- zero-trustSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 50 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this skill to turn business requirements and operational constraints into the simplest production architecture that can be built, …
- Distinctive: line 14
Start with requirements, constraints, scale, and failure tolerance before selecting technologies.
- Distinctive: line 18
Prefer a modular monolith or one ownership boundary until independent scaling, deployment, security, data ownership, or team autonomy …
- Distinctive: line 19
Keep data ownership explicit.
- Distinctive: line 23
Treat security, privacy, operability, and cost as design inputs, not review-stage additions.
- Distinctive: line 24
Verify current vendor limits, guarantees, defaults, and pricing against official sources before relying on them.
- Distinctive: line 38
Ask at most three focused questions that would materially change the architecture.
- Distinctive: line 53
Do not collapse all endpoints and workloads into one SLO.
- Very specific: line 59
Use the design workflow and template (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/system-design/references/design-workflow.md) for estimation and document …
- Distinctive: line 72
Prefer cohesive boundaries over technology-driven decomposition.
- Very specific: line 86
Use the networking skill (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/networking-transport/SKILL.md) for transport choices, the service resilience skill …
- Very specific: line 99
Use the security testing skill (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/security-testing/SKILL.md), Zero Trust skill …
- Distinctive: line 141
When reviewing an existing design:
- Distinctive: line 145
Test the design against peak load, unfair tenants, dependency and control-plane failure, regional failure, data corruption, and operator …
- Very specific: line 150
Use the architecture review checklist (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/system-design/references/architecture-review-checklist.md).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 50 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Production System Design
Use this skill to turn business requirements and operational constraints into the simplest production architecture that can be built, operated, evolved, and recovered safely.
This is not an interview-diagram generator. Every component and complexity must earn its place through a requirement, measured constraint, or explicit risk.
System Design Contract
- Start with requirements, constraints, scale, and failure tolerance before selecting technologies.
- Separate facts, assumptions, estimates, and decisions.
- Quantify demand and SLOs enough to expose bottlenecks; never invent precision.
- Tie every consequential mechanism to a quality-attribute scenario, measurable evidence, and a rollback or revisit trigger.
- Prefer a modular monolith or one ownership boundary until independent scaling, deployment, security, data ownership, or team autonomy justifies a split.
- Keep data ownership explicit. Shared databases and synchronous call chains create coupling even when diagrams show separate services.
- Map correlated failure domains and hidden shared dependencies; replicated components are not isolated when they share a control plane, data store, quota, identity service, or deployment path.
- State consistency and durability guarantees at each boundary.
- Design degraded behavior, recovery, and migration, not only the healthy steady state.
- Treat security, privacy, operability, and cost as design inputs, not review-stage additions.
- Verify current vendor limits, guarantees, defaults, and pricing against official sources before relying on them.
Workflow
1. Frame the problem
Capture:
- users, business outcome, and critical journeys;
- functional requirements and explicit non-goals;
- compliance, privacy, residency, and trust boundaries;
- existing system and migration constraints;
- delivery timeline, team ownership, and operational capability.
Ask at most three focused questions that would materially change the architecture. When answers are unavailable, proceed with clearly labeled assumptions and explain their impact.
2. Define quality targets
Specify:
- availability and durability targets;
- the SLI numerator, denominator, scope, and exclusion policy for each critical journey;
- latency objectives by critical journey and percentile;
- end-to-end latency and availability budgets allocated across required dependencies;
- throughput, concurrency, data volume, retention, and growth;
- recovery time objective and recovery point objective;
- consistency and freshness requirements;
- cost or resource envelope.
Do not collapse all endpoints and workloads into one SLO.
3. Estimate capacity
Show units and arithmetic for baseline, peak, and growth horizon. Estimate requests or events per second, concurrent work, storage, bandwidth, and dominant compute or I/O demand. Include headroom and identify the inputs most sensitive to uncertainty.
Use the design workflow and template (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/system-design/references/design-workflow.md) for estimation and document structure.
4. Establish boundaries and contracts
Define:
- system context and external dependencies;
- component or service responsibilities and owners;
- tenancy model, placement boundary, noisy-neighbor controls, and tenant lifecycle;
- synchronous APIs, asynchronous events, and compatibility rules;
- data stores, authoritative ownership, indexes, and lifecycle;
- identity, authorization, encryption, and secret boundaries.
Prefer cohesive boundaries over technology-driven decomposition.
5. Design runtime behavior
Trace critical write and read paths. For every remote dependency, state:
- timeout and retry ownership;
- idempotency and duplicate behavior;
- ordering and concurrency requirements;
- admission priority, tenant fairness, bounded queues and concurrency, backpressure, shedding, and user-visible overload behavior;
- one end-to-end retry and deadline budget rather than retries at every layer;
- cache correctness and invalidation;
- partial failure and degraded mode.
Use the networking skill (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/networking-transport/SKILL.md) for transport choices, the service resilience skill (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/service-resilience/SKILL.md) for circuit breakers, bulkheads, retry policy, and degraded behavior, and the distributed transactions skill (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/distributed-transactions/SKILL.md) when one business operation spans consistency boundaries.
6. Design operations and recovery
Specify:
- logs, metrics, traces, audit events, dashboards, and alerts;
- health, dependency, saturation, queue-age, and business-invariant signals;
- backup, restore, failover, reconciliation, and disaster-recovery tests;
- failure-domain mapping across region, DNS, identity, configuration, deployment, quotas, observability, and shared control/data planes;
- deployment, rollback, feature flag, and schema migration strategy;
- runbooks, on-call and escalation ownership, operational expertise, cognitive load, and manual intervention.
Use the security testing skill
(${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/security-testing/SKILL.md), Zero Trust skill
(${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/zero-trust/SKILL.md), and observability skill
(${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/observability/SKILL.md) for specialist review.
7. Compare alternatives
Compare two or three credible options against the actual requirements. Include:
- benefits and liabilities;
- operational and migration cost;
- failure blast radius;
- lock-in and reversibility;
- validation signal, decision owner, and review or expiry date;
- condition that would invalidate or roll back the choice.
Choose one and record why it is the simplest option that meets the targets. Do not produce a technology shopping list without a decision.
8. Plan delivery and validation
Define incremental slices, compatibility transitions, data migration, load and failure testing, production signals, and rollback criteria. Prefer reversible steps and shadowing, canaries, or dual-read verification where appropriate.
Specialist Routing
Route depth instead of copying domain procedures:
- Cloud architecture: cloud platforms (
${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/cloud-platforms/SKILL.md) - API contracts and protocol surfaces: API design (
${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/api-design/SKILL.md) and mandatory API gates (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/rules/320-api-design.mdc) - Domain boundaries and models: Domain-Driven Design (
${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/domain-driven-design/SKILL.md) - Dependency failure, overload, and isolation: service resilience (
${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/service-resilience/SKILL.md) - Logs, metrics, traces, SLOs, alerts, and telemetry pipelines: observability (
${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/observability/SKILL.md) - PostgreSQL: database PostgreSQL (
${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/database-postgresql/SKILL.md) - Data platforms and pipelines: data engineering (
${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/data-engineering/SKILL.md) - Event platforms and Kafka governance: Kafka rule (
${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/rules/483-kafka.mdc), data engineering (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/data-engineering/SKILL.md), and distributed transactions (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/distributed-transactions/SKILL.md) - Persistent AI memory and retrieval: memory architecture (
${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/memory-architecture/SKILL.md) - Infrastructure implementation and topology automation: infrastructure as code (
${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/infrastructure-iac/SKILL.md) - Containers: containers orchestration (
${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/containers-orchestration/SKILL.md) and Kubernetes containers (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/kubernetes-containers/SKILL.md) - Architecture visualization: React Flow architecture diagrams (
${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/reactflow-architecture-diagrams/SKILL.md) or documentation standards (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/documentation-standards/SKILL.md) - Stakeholder-weighted decisions: multi-perspective review (
${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/multi-perspective-review/SKILL.md)
Review Mode
When reviewing an existing design:
- Restate the claimed requirements and guarantees.
- Trace critical paths, dependency budgets, tenant/cell placement, and state ownership.
- Test the design against peak load, unfair tenants, dependency and control-plane failure, regional failure, data corruption, and operator error.
- Identify unsupported assumptions and missing evidence.
- Rank findings as Critical, Recommended, or Optional.
- Propose the smallest correction and how to validate it.
Use the architecture review checklist (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/system-design/references/architecture-review-checklist.md).
For cellular designs, use the cell-based architecture reference (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/system-design/references/cell-based-architecture.md). For consequential decisions, use the decision and validation workflow (${HANDBOOK_ROOT}/skills/system-design/references/decision-and-validation-workflow.md).
Required Output
Produce:
- Context, requirements, non-goals, and assumptions
- SLOs and capacity estimates
- Proposed architecture and critical flows
- Data ownership and consistency model
- Reliability, security, observability, and cost controls
- Alternatives and decision rationale
- Migration, testing, and rollout plan
- Risks, unresolved questions, and decision triggers
Distinguish verified evidence from recommendations. Cite current vendor documentation for claims about vendor behavior.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

