task-decomposition
Skill15 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Break down complex tasks into atomic, actionable goals with clear dependencies and success criteria. Use when planning multi-step projects, coordinating agents, or decomposing complex requests. Triggers: "break down task", "decompose", "plan steps", "task breakdown".
18 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- MMACABRE/SKILLStheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- michaelalber/ai-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- mabzhang/opc-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- formal-you/agent-skills-suitetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- AgentShekel/agentic-workflowtheir own version, first seen Oct 14, 2026
Other versions18 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 18
- DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skills★ 216same name
- adamentwistle/fable-skills★ 98same name
- charliehzm/medharness★ 85same name
- baekenough/oh-my-customcode★ 42same name
- aws-solutions/konductor★ 11same name
- hieutrtr/ai1-skills★ 8same name
- AgentShekel/agentic-workflow★ 4same name
- karthikrshet/aiskills★ 4same name
- Lukasbrujula/claude-code-framework★ 4same name
- mabzhang/opc-toolkit★ 4same name
8 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms-full.txtllms.txt
- llms.txtllms.txt
- anti-ai-slopSkill
- architecture-diagramSkill
- atomic-commitSkill
- build-rustSkill
- codacySkill
- crates-io-name-checkSkill
- dora-reportSkill
- goap-agentSkill
- harnessSkill
- issue-triageSkill
- lint-rustSkill
- metrics-reporterSkill
- privacy-firstSkill
- release-rustSkill
- reviewing-pull-requestsSkill
- secret-lintSkill
- self-fix-loopSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-evaluatorSkill
- stacked-prsSkill
- test-rustSkill
- tokio-performanceSkill
- triz-analysisSkill
- triz-solverSkill
- verify-actionsSkill
The file
Files
Task Decomposition
Decompose high-level objectives into manageable, testable sub-tasks.
Framework
1. Requirements Analysis
Extract: Primary objective, implicit requirements, constraints, success criteria.
2. Goal Hierarchy
Main Goal
├─ Sub-goal 1 → Tasks 1.1, 1.2
├─ Sub-goal 2 → Task 2.1
└─ Sub-goal 3Atomic Criteria: Single action, defined inputs/outputs, one agent, testable.
3. Dependency Mapping
- Sequential: A → B → C
- Parallel: A, B, C (independent)
- Converging: A, B, C → D
4. Success Criteria
Define: Inputs, outputs, quality standards.
Process
Step 1: Understand Goal
Request: [Original]
Goal: [Main objective]
Type: [Implementation/Debug/Refactor]
Complexity: [Simple/Medium/Complex]Step 2: Identify Components (3-7)
Step 3: Decompose Components
Step 4: Map Dependencies
Step 5: Assign Priorities
- P0 (Critical), P1 (Important), P2 (Nice-to-have)
Step 6: Estimate Complexity
- Low (<30min), Medium (30min-2hr), High (>2hr)
Patterns
Layer-Based (Rust)
- Data types / schemas
- Business logic
- API / CLI interface
- Integration tests
- Documentation
Feature-Based
- Core (MVP)
- Error handling (
thiserror/anyhow) - Performance (benches)
- Integration
- Testing
- Docs
Problem-Solution
- Reproduce
- Diagnose
- Design
- Fix
- Verify
- Prevent
Quality Checklist
- Atomic and actionable tasks
- Dependencies identified
- Measurable success criteria
- Appropriate complexity estimates
- No task >4 hours
- Parallelization opportunities found
Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
| "I already know what needs to be done, no need to decompose" | Skipping decomposition leads to scope creep, missed dependencies, and rework. |
| "The task is too simple to break down" | Even simple tasks benefit from explicit success criteria and dependency mapping. |
Red Flags
- Defining tasks that are too vague to test or verify
- Skipping dependency mapping between decomposed tasks
- Creating tasks larger than 4 hours without further breakdown
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

