loops-react-native
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
React Native / Expo implementation loop — for implementation work only. Use when the user asks to implement, build, create, add, modify, fix, or refactor any React Native or Expo surface (screen, component, route, hook, state layer, API client, native module, configuration, test, or library), or on explicit /loops-react-native.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- loops-androidSkill
- loops-flutterSkill
- loops-nuxtSkill
- project-flowSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
25 rules. About 0 are common, 19 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈19
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Run a tight red/green loop for a single React Native or Expo change.
- Distinctive: line 31
Do not auto-invoke for:
- Distinctive: line 38
If in doubt, prefer invoking the skill whenever the user wants code that must be written, validated, and made production-ready in a React …
- Distinctive: line 42
Create a loop marker file at the start and remove it at the end.
- Distinctive: line 48
If blocked and stopping: leave the file in place, include the blocker in your final report, and tell the user to delete the marker manually …
- Distinctive: line 52
Before writing code, confirm this is a React Native or Expo project and determine which kind:
- Very specific: line 54
Look for package.json at the project root.
- Very specific: line 62
Read package.json to note the package name, dependencies, scripts, and package manager (presence of package-lock.json, yarn.lock, …
- Very specific: line 66
If the task is being executed through project-flow, respect its approved feature implementation plan.
- Distinctive: line 68
If the project is not React Native / Expo, stop and report that this skill is the wrong tool.
- Distinctive: line 76
If the request is ambiguous, ask a focused clarifying question rather than guessing.
- Distinctive: line 82
Prefer existing skills when they fit, but invoke only the ones relevant to the task.
- Distinctive: line 122
Do not introduce unrelated refactors.
- Distinctive: line 124
When the task or failure involves Expo / React Native framework-level behavior, consult the Expo MCP before assuming:
- Very specific: line 126
Use mcp_list_tools on the expo server to discover available tools.
- Very specific: line 127
Use documentation tools (read_documentation, search_documentation, learn), dependency guidance (add_library), and EAS/project tools as …
- Distinctive: line 129
Do not call the MCP for trivial CSS, copy changes, static assets, or unrelated business logic.
- Distinctive: line 133
Run the relevant project commands in this order, stopping at the first red signal and jumping to 5.
- Distinctive: line 154
If any validation command goes red:
- Distinctive: line 158
If framework-level behavior is involved (Expo APIs, Expo Router, React Native components, layout, navigation, Metro, EAS, data fetching, …
- Very specific: line 160
Use mcp_list_tools on the expo server, then use the relevant documentation, dependency, or project tools.
- Distinctive: line 164
Do not weaken lint rules, TypeScript checks, or tests merely to make the loop pass.
- Distinctive: line 169
Keep a failure log mentally: if the same error repeats after a fix, your hypothesis was wrong.
- Distinctive: line 171
Stop looping if continuing would require a product/business decision, an external dependency, or a destructive/irreversible action.
- Distinctive: line 175
Only stop when one of these is true:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
loops-react-native — Autonomous React Native / Expo validation loop
Run a tight red/green loop for a single React Native or Expo change. Do not stop until the change is implemented and the relevant validation is green, or you hit a genuine blocker that requires a human decision.
Activation
This skill is the orchestration layer for implementation tasks in React Native / Expo repositories.
Auto-invoke when all of these are true:
- The repository is a React Native or Expo project (see 1. Detect the project shape).
- The user asks for a concrete code change using verbs such as implement, build, create, add, modify, fix, refactor, integrate, extend, wire up, or set up.
- The requested change targets a React Native / Expo surface: screen, component, route, navigation, hook, state-management layer, API client, utility, asset, native module, Expo configuration, EAS configuration, test, or library API.
Also invoke on explicit /loops-react-native regardless of the task wording.
Do not auto-invoke for:
- Conceptual questions ("Explain how Expo Router works.")
- Reading or summarizing files ("What does this file do?")
- Brainstorming or architecture-only discussion ("What do you think about this architecture?")
- Trivial copy/text changes unless validation is genuinely useful.
If in doubt, prefer invoking the skill whenever the user wants code that must be written, validated, and made production-ready in a React Native / Expo repo.
Loop marker
Create a loop marker file at the start and remove it at the end. This lets agent stop-hooks prevent premature termination while the loop is running.
The default marker path is <project-root>/.agents/state/loops-react-native.active. This is the universal loop-state convention used across all loops-* skills. An agent-specific integration may enforce this state through its native lifecycle mechanism (for example, Devin's Stop hook); such mechanisms are documented under integrations/<agent>/ and are not required for the skill to function.
- At start: resolve the project root, create
.agents/state/if it does not exist, then write the marker file containing the current ISO timestamp and the task summary. - At successful end: delete the marker file.
- If blocked and stopping: leave the file in place, include the blocker in your final report, and tell the user to delete the marker manually if they want to bypass any active stop enforcement.
1. Detect the project shape
Before writing code, confirm this is a React Native or Expo project and determine which kind:
- Look for
package.jsonat the project root. - React Native project:
package.jsondeclaresreact-nativeindependencies, and the project containsandroid/,ios/,src/orapp/(Expo Router),index.js,App.js/App.tsx, ormetro.config.js. - Expo managed / Continuous Native Generation project:
package.jsondeclaresexpoindependencies, plusapp.json/app.config.js/app.config.ts, and commonlyapp/(Expo Router) orApp.js. - Expo development build / dev-client project:
expo-dev-clientindependencies,ios/andandroid/directories may be present but should be regenerated through prebuild/CNG rather than hand-edited. - Expo Router application:
package.jsondeclaresexpo-routerand the project has anapp/directory with file-based routes. - Bare React Native project without Expo:
react-nativeindependencies, noexpo. - React Native library/package:
package.jsonwithout anapp.json, withsrc/orlib/, and typicallyreact-nativeinpeerDependencies.
Read package.json to note the package name, dependencies, scripts, and package manager (presence of package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, or bun.lockb/bun.lock).
Also read project instructions if they exist: AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, README.md, docs/plan.md, docs/handoff.md, the target docs/features/XX-feature.md, app.json / app.config.*, and eas.json.
If the task is being executed through project-flow, respect its approved feature implementation plan. Do not bypass the human approval gate.
If the project is not React Native / Expo, stop and report that this skill is the wrong tool.
2. Understand the change
From the user's request and conversation context:
- Identify the affected surface (screen, component, route, hook, state layer, API client, utility, asset, native module, config, test).
- Identify files likely to change. Use
grep/find_file_by_nameto locate related code, existing tests, and architecture conventions. - If the request is ambiguous, ask a focused clarifying question rather than guessing.
3. Plan and implement
- Build a tight validation signal first if possible: a specific test, lint/typecheck command, or build output that will go red before the fix and green after.
- Implement the change using the project's existing patterns.
Prefer existing skills when they fit, but invoke only the ones relevant to the task. Do not mechanically call every Expo skill.
Official Expo / React Native skills to reach for when the task matches:
/expo-routerfor navigation and routing with Expo Router./expo-data-fetchingfor network requests, API calls, caching, and data-loading patterns./expo-native-uifor native-feeling screens and Apple HIG / platform-specific styling./expo-uifor cross-platform native UI with@expo/ui, SwiftUI / Jetpack Compose trees./expo-project-structurefor laying out a new Expo Router project./expo-dev-clientfor development builds and TestFlight distribution./expo-domfor Expo DOM components and web-code-in-webview migration./expo-examplesfor canonical third-party library integrations and example-based scaffolding./expo-modulefor creating or modifying Expo native modules and views./expo-migrate-modulefor migrating an existing Swift Expo module to the v2 macro API./expo-tailwind-setupfor Tailwind CSS v4 / NativeWind v5 setup./expo-web-to-nativefor end-to-end migration of a web app to native./expo-upgradefor Expo SDK upgrades./expo-app-clipfor iOS App Clip targets./expo-brownfieldfor embedding React Native into an existing native app./expo-skill-feedbackfor submitting feedback or managing Expo skill telemetry.
Official EAS skills to reach for when the task matches:
/eas-workflowsfor CI/CD workflow YAML files and EAS workflow syntax./eas-app-storesfor store submissions, TestFlight, and app store metadata./eas-hostingfor deploying Expo websites and API routes./eas-simulatorfor remote cloud simulators./eas-update-insightsfor EAS Update channels and usage./eas-observefor EAS Observe metrics and instrumentation.
General engineering skills to reach for when the task matches:
/architectfor any load-bearing design choice that is not already decided./developfor the build step when a spec exists./prototypefor a throwaway proof-of-concept./researchfor framework or API facts./tddfor test-first work./testfor writing tests after implementation./check verifyfor final acceptance verification./debugfor a clear, isolated bug./diagnosing-bugsfor a hard or non-deterministic failure./code-reviewfor a final review before declaring done.
Do not introduce unrelated refactors. Keep the change scoped.
When the task or failure involves Expo / React Native framework-level behavior, consult the Expo MCP before assuming:
- Use
mcp_list_toolson theexposerver to discover available tools. - Use documentation tools (
read_documentation,search_documentation,learn), dependency guidance (add_library), and EAS/project tools as appropriate.
Do not call the MCP for trivial CSS, copy changes, static assets, or unrelated business logic.
4. Validate the change
Run the relevant project commands in this order, stopping at the first red signal and jumping to 5. Diagnose and fix:
- Format — the project's format script if defined (commonly
npm run format/yarn format/pnpm format/bun format), orprettier --check ./eslint --fixas appropriate. Run this first because it is fast and deterministic. - Lint — the script in
package.json(commonlynpm run lint,pnpm lint,yarn lint,bun lint). - Typecheck — the script in
package.json(typecheck,type-check,tsc --noEmit), or runtsc --noEmitdirectly if no script exists. - Relevant tests — run tests closest to the change first, then broader suites:
- Unit tests for changed files:
jest <path>or the project's test runner. - Component tests with React Native Testing Library:
npm test <component_test_path>. - Integration / E2E tests when the change touches an end-to-end flow (Maestro, Detox, Jest integration tests, etc.).
- Full test command when the change is broad.
- Unit tests for changed files:
- Project health — when available and appropriate:
npx expo install --checkto verify compatible package versions.npx expo doctorif the project uses it.- Metro bundler health check (
npx expo startno-op or bundle precheck).
- Build —
npx expo export(web), EAS build preview, or the project's build script when the change touches routing, build configuration, native setup, platform code, or release behavior. For trivial layout/copy changes, build is optional but still run if cheap. - Runtime verification — for UI/runtime changes where meaningful and where the environment supports it, launch or attach to the app and use hot reload, React Native DevTools, or the Expo MCP local runtime tools to verify the target screen/flow renders and behaves correctly. Skip this when it adds no meaningful value or when no simulator/emulator/device is available.
Choose the fastest command that still covers the change. Tighten the loop by running file-scoped checks before full-suite checks.
5. Diagnose and fix (red loop)
If any validation command goes red:
- Capture the exact error message, file path, and line number.
- Determine whether the failure is related to the requested change or pre-existing.
- If framework-level behavior is involved (Expo APIs, Expo Router, React Native components, layout, navigation, Metro, EAS, data fetching, state management, platform channels, build configuration, dependency compatibility):
- Consult the Expo MCP before assuming.
- Use
mcp_list_toolson theexposerver, then use the relevant documentation, dependency, or project tools.
- Form a falsifiable hypothesis and a minimal fix.
- Apply the fix. Prefer fixing the root cause over suppressing errors.
- Re-run the failing validation command (and any cheaper checks it depends on) before running the full suite again.
- Do not weaken lint rules, TypeScript checks, or tests merely to make the loop pass.
6. Iterate safely
- Maintain a
todo_writelist so the loop is visible and scoped. - Keep a failure log mentally: if the same error repeats after a fix, your hypothesis was wrong. Re-diagnose.
- Limit: after 5 consecutive red iterations on the same root symptom, escalate to the user with what was tried and what is blocking.
- Stop looping if continuing would require a product/business decision, an external dependency, or a destructive/irreversible action.
7. Stop and report
Only stop when one of these is true:
- The change is implemented and all relevant validation passes.
- A genuine external blocker exists that cannot be resolved from the repository, tools, MCPs, documentation, or environment.
- A missing product/business decision blocks further progress.
- The next step requires destructive or irreversible human approval.
Final report (concise):
- What changed: files touched and a one-line summary.
- What was validated: the commands/checks that passed.
- Result: green / blocked.
- Remaining non-blocking warnings, if any.
If blocked:
- What is blocking progress.
- What was already tried.
- The exact human decision or missing dependency required.
Bypass and portability
- To disable any active stop enforcement for a session, delete the loop marker file (
.agents/state/loops-react-native.activeby default). - To skip the loop entirely, do not invoke
/loops-react-native; issue instructions normally. - To adjust the loop, edit the installed skill file in your agent's skills directory.
Portability note
This skill is agent-neutral. It assumes only that the agent can read files, run shell commands, search the codebase, invoke other skills, and use MCP tools if configured. Agent-specific lifecycle enforcement (such as a Stop hook) belongs in integrations/<agent>/loops-react-native/ and is optional.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

