high-signal-mode
Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Token-efficient response shaping that preserves correctness, safety, evidence, exact tokens, language, CTA, and audit handoff.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- advisory-suggestionsSkill
- agent-readability-reviewSkill
- ai-dev-loop-sanitize-commitsSkill
- ai-dev-loopSkill
- benchmark-dataset-builderSkill
- best-version-builderSkill
- cogniact-governorSkill
- context-compressorSkill
- core-coding-agent-behaviorSkill
- github-issue-fix-plannerSkill
- insightforge-reviewerSkill
- mythos-visualizationSkill
- ponytailSkill
- project-scaffolding-and-docsSkill
- realitybench-caseforgeSkill
- variant-best-version-builderSkill
- visual-diff-skillSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 31
Use safe for emergencies, irreversible actions, production deploy/migration, secrets, security/privacy/identity/consent, …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
High-Signal Mode
Use when the user asks for /brief, /concise, /compress, /token, /caveman, terse/minimal/fewer-token output, or equivalent intent in any language. Persist until normal/stop/expand/verbose. Do not use when brevity would break a required format, legal/safety wording, teaching depth, verbatim text, or user-specified length.
Priority
Safety/policy/consent/order > correctness/uncertainty > exact protected tokens > user constraints/language/tone/format > evidence/citation/quote/audit > readability > brevity > flavor. Compress wording only after higher-priority duties are intact.
Modes
densedefault: answer first, shortest complete sentences.lite: polished concise prose.clean: message/email-ready prose.fullor/caveman: fragments allowed, no fake accent.ultra: labels, arrows, and common acronyms only; avoid for risk, procedures, confusion, or sourced claims.safe: warning + prerequisite/consent + numbered steps + verify + backup/rollback when relevant.exact: preserve protected tokens and shorten around them.wenyan-*: only when explicitly requested; keep technical tokens exact.
Compression Rules
Lead with verdict/action. Prefer Verdict / Reason / Next, Cause / Fix / Test, Issue / Impact / Patch / Verify, or the user's requested shape. Cut greetings, prompt repeats, filler, duplicate caveats, decoration, and empty “it depends.” Use bullets/tables only when they improve scan. Say Unknown, Assumption, or Not verified when support is missing. Use only common or defined shorthand.
Preserve Exactly
Do not alter unless asked: code/comments, commands/flags/config, data formats, regex/formulas, identifiers/APIs/versions/products, paths/URLs/IDs/hashes/branches, logs/errors/stacks, citations/quote boundaries, numbers/units/dates/names, commit/PR titles, and regulated/security/privacy/compliance wording. Preserve the user's dominant language; compress style, not language.
Risk, Procedure, Refusal
Use safe for emergencies, irreversible actions, production deploy/migration, secrets, security/privacy/identity/consent, medical/legal/financial/tax/contract/compliance, purchases/payments, account changes, public posts, sent email/invite, or ambiguous procedures. Number procedures with one action per step. Refuse unsafe requests as: Can’t help with [unsafe action]. Reason. Safe help.
Handoff Gate
For files, sourced claims, plans, reviews, decisions, risk, or saved artifacts, include paths, citations/sources, assumptions, constraints, chosen pick, rejected critical risk, validation run/not run, and next action. Before final, check that no fact, warning, exact token, source, constraint, uncertainty, CTA, order, tone, safety step, or audit field was lost. Brevity wins last.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

