Self-review discipline for in-conversation use — apply before declaring code complete or before committing. Walks correctness, security, maintainability, and convention checks at the time of writing. For focused review of a large diff in a fresh context, delegate to the code-reviewer agent.
Code Review Rule. Use this rule when you need expert code review for quality, security, and maintainability. This rule should be used proactively after writing logical chunks of code, before merging pull requests, or when explicitly asked to review code. Example: After implementing a new feature in a Go plugin, use this rule to review the code for potential issues. Example: When asked '请对 PR 1234 进行代码评审', 'Code Review fork/feature/x', '将 fork/feature/x 对比 main 进行CR' use this rule to perform a thorough security-focused review.
2.2k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Self-review security discipline applied while writing — walk the threat model of the change (untrusted input, authz, secrets, crypto, dependencies) before handing it off. Invoke before declaring security-relevant code complete or committing it. The in-conversation companion to the security-reviewer agent; for a focused pass on a large diff in fresh context, delegate to that agent.
Language- and framework-specific code review lenses layered on top of the general four-domain review in code-review-edho-ferdian — idioms, framework security misconfigurations, ORM/query correctness, performance traps, and testing conventions, auto-detected across ~20 stacks (React, Python, Go, Java/Spring, Ruby, and more — see the reference table below for the full list). Use whenever a review touches a specific language/framework and the generic checklist isn't enough — \"review kode Go/Python/React ini\", \"audit Django models\", \"cek FastAPI endpoint ini\", or when the user names a stack while asking for review. Load it for any review of code in a named framework, even one or two files: its per-stack lenses carry the framework misconfigurations and ORM query traps that a generic read of the code misses. Loads only the lens file(s) matching the detected stack. Inherits Reflection and Critique-Correction gates from code-review-edho-ferdian.
2123d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Expert code review specialist. Proactively reviews code for quality, security, and maintainability. Use immediately after writing or modifying code. MUST BE USED for all code changes.
224mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Authoring and configuration guidance for building React/Next.js frontend applications well from the start — component composition, UX/interaction recipes, Vite config, HeroUI setup, and AI-slop detection (see the Reference files table below for the full breakdown). A companion to language-code-review-edho-ferdian (which reviews code after it's written) — use this when DESIGNING or WRITING new frontend code, not when reviewing existing code. Trigger phrases: \"bagaimana cara structure component ini\", \"best practice React untuk X\", \"setup Vite untuk Y\", \"biar UI-nya gak keliatan AI banget\", \"kok hasil desainnya generic/template banget\", or when starting a new frontend feature.
2123d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Use Assumption Checkpoint when diagnosing bugs, changing code, reviewing code, explaining unfamiliar code, making implementation decisions, or calling work complete.
Blunt, factual code review. No sugar coating. Finds bugs, security issues, performance problems, and architecture flaws. Use when user says /codereview or asks to review code.
Dispatch a fresh reviewer agent with a clean context to critique the code after audit-code passes. The reviewer has no shared state with the coding agent and gives a genuine second opinion. Use after audit-code passes, before committing, or when user wants an independent code review.
2742mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Guidelines for writing clean, maintainable, and human-readable code. Apply these rules when writing or reviewing code to ensure consistency and quality.
3k16mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Use when reviewing code that touches the database or persistence layer. Covers index strategy, query count, N+1, transaction scope, migration safety, and connection pooling. Load instead of the general code-review skill for DB-focused reviews.
Guidelines for writing clean, maintainable, and human-readable code. Apply these rules when writing or reviewing code to ensure consistency and quality.
2.1k9mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount