agentleFS
crustacean-devcrustacean-dev/knowledge-skills/skills/tasks/SKILL.md

tasks

Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Break a feature into ordered implementation tasks. Use this skill whenever the user says "tasks", "tasks <feature>", "break this down", "what needs to be built", "implementation order", "task list", "what's next", "story breakdown", or wants to know what to implement and in what order. Also use when the user wants to update task status ("mark TASK-3 done"), reorder tasks, add tasks, split tasks, or check progress on existing tasks. Trigger even for casual phrasing like "what's left to build", "figure out the implementation steps", "create stories for this feature", or "what do I need to build first". Produces .knowledge/features/<feature>/tasks.md from spec.md + plan.md. Does NOT produce specs (/spec), plans (/plan), code (/implement), or review specs (/clarify).

49 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use send-user-message, tinyagi-admin and 8 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Maliot100XSkill

    send-user-message

    Send a proactive message to a paired user via their channel (Discord, Telegram, or WhatsApp). Use when the agent needs to notify, alert, or send an unsolicited message to a user — especially during heartbeat invocations, scheduled tasks, or when the agent wants to reach out without a prior user message in the current conversation. Triggers: 'send message to user', 'notify user', 'alert user', 'message the user on discord/telegram/whatsapp', or any need to proactively communicate with a paired sender.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • jlia0Skill

    tinyagi-admin

    Manage and operate the TinyAGI system itself — agents, teams, settings, queue, tasks, daemon lifecycle, and source code. Use when the agent needs to: list/add/remove/update agents or teams, check queue status, view logs, start/stop/restart TinyAGI, change settings (provider, model, channels), send messages to the queue, manage tasks, retry dead-letter messages, view recent responses, modify TinyAGI source code or configuration, or perform any administrative operation on the TinyAGI platform. Triggers: 'manage tinyagi', 'add an agent', 'remove a team', 'check queue', 'view logs', 'restart tinyagi', 'change provider', 'update settings', 'create a task', 'modify tinyagi code'.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ArvorCoSkill

    specify

    Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    quality

    Evaluates whether a GitHub issue is spam, empty, needs more information, or is OK to proceed.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • anyprotoSkill

    skills-manager

    Context-aware routing to skills and hooks management. Use when troubleshooting skill activation, fine-tuning keywords, or managing the automated documentation system.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • bivexSkill

    schedule

    Управление расписанием занятий с специалистами по самосовершенствованию. Используй когда пользователь спрашивает о расписании, хочет добавить/удалить/перенести занятие, посмотреть план на день или неделю.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 42 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If either is missing, STOP.

    line 17
  2. Very specific:

    Check if .knowledge/features/<feature>/tasks.md already exists.

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    If it exists: Read it in full. You are in amendment mode.

    line 25
  4. Very specific:

    Read spec.md and plan.md in full.

    line 30
  5. Distinctive:

    If a task touches more than 5 files, it's too big.

    line 44
  6. Distinctive:

    If describing the task takes more than 10 lines, it's too big.

    line 46
  7. Very specific:

    If a task is blocked, add a Blocked by: <reason> field.

    line 145
  8. Very specific:

    Every task must reference which US it implements via Implements: US-N.

    line 151
  9. Distinctive:

    Every task must list the exact files to create or modify.

    line 152
  10. Distinctive:

    No task should depend on more than 2 other tasks.

    line 154
  11. Distinctive:

    Do NOT duplicate spec content in task descriptions.

    line 156
  12. Distinctive:

    If the plan or spec has unresolved questions ouvertes, flag them as blockers on the affected tasks.

    line 157

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 42 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Tasks

You produce .knowledge/features/<feature>/tasks.md — an ordered list of implementation tasks that /implement will execute one by one. Each task is a self-contained unit of work with no ambiguity about what to build.

Prerequisites

Both must exist:

  • .knowledge/features/<feature>/spec.md — what to build
  • .knowledge/features/<feature>/plan.md — how to build it

If either is missing, STOP. Tell the user which one to create first (/spec <feature> or /plan <feature>).

Also read .knowledge/constitution.md and .knowledge/architecture.md for project-level context.

Phase 0: Detection

Check if .knowledge/features/<feature>/tasks.md already exists.

  • If it exists: Read it in full. You are in amendment mode. Ask the user what they want to change — add tasks, reorder, update status, split a task, remove a task. Preserve completed tasks and their status. Do NOT regenerate the full list.
  • If it does not exist: Proceed to Phase 1.

Phase 1: Analyze

Read spec.md and plan.md in full. Identify:

  1. Implementation units — What are the distinct pieces of work? Each user story may map to one or more tasks. Each architectural component from the plan may need its own task.
  2. Dependencies — What must be built before what? A service that depends on a data model means the data model task comes first.
  3. Foundational tasks — Is there setup work (scaffolding, config, types) that other tasks depend on? These come first.
  4. Test tasks — Are tests a separate task or part of each task? Default: tests are part of each task (each task includes writing tests for what it builds). Only split tests into a separate task if the spec has a complex test setup (fixtures, mocks, test utilities) that other tasks depend on.

Phase 2: Draft

Generate the task list using the template below. Present it to the user for review.

Sizing rules:

  • A task should be completable in a single /implement session — typically 1-3 files created or modified.
  • If a task touches more than 5 files, it's too big. Split it.
  • Maximum 3 acceptance criteria per task. Each AC becomes a test assertion that /implement must satisfy — more than 3 means the task is doing too much and should be split. This is a hard limit, not a suggestion.
  • If describing the task takes more than 10 lines, it's too big.

Right-sized AC example:

**Acceptance criteria:**
- Returns `TokenPayload` for a valid, non-expired token
- Returns `null` for expired, tampered, or revoked tokens — does not throw
- Tests pass for valid, expired, tampered, and revoked token scenarios

Three criteria: the happy path, the failure path, and tests. That's the right shape. If you find yourself writing a 4th criterion, it means the task covers too many concerns — split it. For example, "validates token" and "checks revocation list" are two tasks if they each need their own AC.

Ordering rules:

  • Dependencies first. If task B imports from task A's output, A comes first.
  • Foundational tasks (types, interfaces, config) before logic tasks.
  • Core logic before edge cases and error handling.
  • Happy path before error paths.

Phase 3: Validate & Write

Iterate until the user confirms, then write to .knowledge/features/<feature>/tasks.md. Create the directory if needed.

Template

# Tasks — <Feature Name>

> Feature: `.knowledge/features/<feature>/spec.md`
> Plan: `.knowledge/features/<feature>/plan.md`
> Total: <N> tasks

---

## Progress

| Status      | Count |
| ----------- | ----- |
| TODO        | <n>   |
| IN_PROGRESS | <n>   |
| DONE        | <n>   |

---

## Task list

### TASK-1: <Title>

**Status:** TODO
**Depends on:** — (none, or TASK-N)
**Implements:** US-1 (partial), US-2
**Files:**

- Create `<path/to/file>` — <what this file does>
- Modify `<path/to/file>` — <what changes>

**Description:**
<2-5 sentences: what to build, what decisions are already made in plan.md, what to watch out for.>

**Acceptance criteria:**

- <Criterion — verifiable, from spec.md or derived from plan.md>
- <Criterion>
- Tests pass for <what's being tested>

---

### TASK-2: <Title>

**Status:** TODO
**Depends on:** TASK-1
**Implements:** US-3
**Files:**

- Create `<path/to/file>`
- Modify `<path/to/file>`

**Description:**
<...>

**Acceptance criteria:**

- <...>

---

### TASK-N: <Title>

...

Status lifecycle

TODO → IN_PROGRESS → DONE
  • /implement sets a task to IN_PROGRESS when starting it, DONE when finished.
  • If a task is blocked, add a **Blocked by:** <reason> field.
  • Tasks can go back to TODO if implementation reveals the task was wrongly scoped.

Rules

  • This skill produces ONLY tasks.md for a feature. Never specs, plans, or code.
  • Every task must reference which US it implements via **Implements:** US-N. Orphan tasks (not tied to any US) are not allowed — if a task is needed but no US covers it, flag it and ask the user if a US is missing from the spec.
  • Every task must list the exact files to create or modify. "/implement should figure out where to put it" is not acceptable.
  • Tasks must be ordered — the list is a sequence, not a bag. Dependencies are explicit.
  • No task should depend on more than 2 other tasks. If it does, there's a missing intermediate task.
  • Each task includes writing tests for what it builds. Tests are not a separate task unless the spec requires shared test infrastructure.
  • Do NOT duplicate spec content in task descriptions. Reference the US ("Implements US-3") and add only implementation-specific guidance from plan.md.
  • If the plan or spec has unresolved questions ouvertes, flag them as blockers on the affected tasks.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.