roadmap
Skill4 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Planning and roadmap management skill with machine-readable YAML schemas for initiatives, projects, milestones, epics, sprints, and tasks. Use this skill when the user asks to: create a project plan, manage a roadmap, track progress, organize sprints, prioritize a backlog, estimate timelines, define milestones, or says anything like: "plan this", "roadmap", "what should we build next", "prioritize", "sprint planning", "milestone", "backlog", "project status", "what's left to do", or when organizing multi-week work into structured delivery phases.
48 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- gopalparashar421/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dirien/yet-another-agent-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Ovich/charrettetheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- ryanmoelter/plumetheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- eyssette/js-templatetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- danielcherubini/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use sequence, stakeholder-update and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GTMifySkillsequence
Build a multi-channel outreach cadence (email + LinkedIn + phone) for a target persona or named prospect. Use when the user says 'build a sequence', 'outreach cadence', 'multi-touch sequence', 'multi-channel cadence', 'follow-up sequence', or needs a coordinated multi-channel play. Do NOT use for single cold emails — use cold-email instead.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillstakeholder-update
Generate a stakeholder update tailored to audience and cadence. Use when writing a weekly or monthly status for leadership, announcing a launch, escalating a risk or blocker, or translating the same progress into exec-brief, engineering-detail, or customer-facing versions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
EpistatesSkillstrategy
Plan weekly or monthly X content strategy. Use when the user wants to plan their content calendar, set growth goals, build a content pipeline, or think strategically about their X presence.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ArvorCoSkillspecify
Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GitHubSkillprd
Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.
Also in 7 projects that use this
michalattSkillchallenge
Pressure-test plans, decisions, and directions by picking and answering the most relevant challenge questions for the current conversation
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions48 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 48
- cloudposse/atmos★ 1.4ksame name
- me2resh/apexyard★ 542same name
- andreaskelm/pm-brain★ 235same name
- genkovich/sdd★ 187same name
- YougLin-dev/Aha-Loop★ 181same name
- Ovid/paad★ 150same name
- facebookresearch/autoform-bot★ 136same name
- Mehdibargach/claude-code-pm-skills★ 97same name
- joshuadavidthomas/agent-skills★ 49same name
- spmtitsolution/OpenBA-Kit★ 38same name
38 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- debug-loopSkill
- implementSkill
- lean-typescriptSkill
- spec-drivenSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 41 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
No external tools needed — agents and humans read the same file.
- Very specific: line 36
Create a .project/roadmap.yaml at the project root:
- Distinctive: line 86
Use WSJF (Weighted Shortest Job First) for backlog ordering:
- Distinctive: line 118
When asked to update the roadmap:
- Very specific: line 122
Update status and updated fields
- Very specific: line 124
If a milestone's exit criteria are all met → mark it done
- Distinctive: line 125
Write the updated YAML back
- Distinctive: line 127
When asked for status:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 41 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Roadmap
Flat-file, git-versioned roadmap management. One YAML file is the source of truth. No external tools needed — agents and humans read the same file.
Hierarchy
Initiative (strategic theme, e.g., "Platform Launch")
└── Project (deliverable, e.g., "Auth System")
└── Milestone (checkpoints with exit criteria)
└── Epic (feature group)
└── Task (atomic work item, ≤1 day)Each level has an id, title, status, and owner. Tasks also have estimate and priority.
Quick Start
Create a .project/roadmap.yaml at the project root:
roadmap:
title: "My Project Roadmap"
updated: 2026-03-18
initiatives:
- id: INIT-001
title: "MVP Launch"
status: in-progress
projects:
- id: PROJ-001
title: "Core API"
owner: "@team-backend"
milestones:
- id: MS-001
title: "API v1 Complete"
target_date: 2026-04-15
exit_criteria:
- "All CRUD endpoints passing integration tests"
- "Auth middleware deployed"
epics:
- id: EPIC-001
title: "User Management"
tasks:
- id: T-001
title: "User registration endpoint"
status: done
estimate: 0.5d
- id: T-002
title: "User profile CRUD"
status: in-progress
estimate: 1d
priority: highStatus Values
planned → in-progress → done
→ blocked (requires note)
→ cut (descoped, requires reason)Prioritization
Use WSJF (Weighted Shortest Job First) for backlog ordering:
WSJF = (business_value + time_criticality + risk_reduction) / job_size| Factor | Scale |
| business_value | 1-5 |
| time_criticality | 1-5 |
| risk_reduction | 1-5 |
| job_size | 1-5 (1 = XS, 5 = XL) |
Higher WSJF → do first.
Progress Computation
milestone_progress = done_tasks / total_tasks
project_progress = avg(milestone_progress for each milestone)
initiative_progress = avg(project_progress for each project)Count only done tasks. blocked and cut tasks are excluded from the denominator
if they have exclude_from_progress: true.
Agent Workflow for Updates
When asked to update the roadmap:
- Read
.project/roadmap.yaml - Identify which tasks/milestones changed
- Update
statusandupdatedfields - Recompute progress for affected milestones/projects
- If a milestone's exit criteria are all met → mark it
done - Write the updated YAML back
When asked for status:
- Read the roadmap
- Compute progress at each level
- Report: what's done, what's in progress, what's blocked, what's next
Sprint Planning
For sprint-based teams, add a sprints section:
sprints:
- id: SPRINT-01
title: "Sprint 1"
start: 2026-03-18
end: 2026-03-29
goal: "Complete user registration flow"
tasks: [T-001, T-002, T-003]
velocity_planned: 8
velocity_actual: null # filled at sprint endIntegration Points
- Issue trackers — export tasks as GitHub Issues / Linear tickets
- CI/CD — milestone exit criteria map to CI pipeline gates
- Skills system — the
implementskill reads the roadmap to understand what to build next
For the full YAML schema definition with all fields and validation rules, read
references/schemas.md.
Anti-Patterns
- Roadmap without exit criteria — milestones become meaningless checkboxes
- Tasks larger than 1 day — break them down; large tasks hide complexity
- No owner on projects — unowned work doesn't get done
- Updating the tool but not the file — the YAML file is the source of truth, always
- Planning everything upfront — plan one sprint ahead in detail, the rest in broad strokes
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

