agentleFS
coval-aicoval-ai/coval-external-skills/skills/evaluation/coval-eval-start/SKILL.md

coval-eval-start

Skill3 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub

Choose the next useful step for evaluating a voice or chat agent with Coval. Use for getting started or deciding what to do next; use a specific skill directly when the task is already clear.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Start with a small, scoped inventory.

    line 25
  2. Distinctive:

    No credentials yet? Explain setup using the CLI installation guide, and continue designing locally if the customer wants that.

    line 27
  3. Distinctive:

    Before execution, state the selected cases, metric IDs, maximum simulations, call-duration limit, and stopping condition.

    line 57
  4. Distinctive:

    When the customer already knows the failure, don't require a large discovery study before adding a useful regression test.

    line 60
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not call a starter run statistically conclusive or release-certified.

    line 65

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Start a Coval evaluation

Help the customer answer a product question, not accumulate evaluation resources. Find their situation, explain the next useful step in one sentence, and follow the matching skill. Reuse supplied context; ask only for missing information.

Establish the starting point

Identify the agent's job, the decision the customer wants to make, and what evidence they already have: an endpoint, a test set, completed conversations, an observed failure, or reviewer labels. A first-time Coval user may already have production recordings; don't send them through synthetic onboarding.

For a connected account, check coval --version, coval --agent agent doctor, and the relevant resource's context/--help. Confirm the intended organization, API environment and workspace with the customer or their existing configuration. Doctor checks authentication/connectivity; it does not prove the organization identity. Never print a key or inspect other organizations to find a match.

Start with a small, scoped inventory. --agent responses wrap payloads in data; check ok and the process exit code. A list can be one page, not the whole account. No credentials yet? Explain setup using the CLI installation guide, and continue designing locally if the customer wants that.

Route by evidence

Customer situationNext skillUseful output
No completed conversations; wants a first live evaluationonboardA small, real run with inspected results and clear limits
Has recordings, transcripts or runs; wants to understand failurescoval-discover-failuresEvidence-backed failure hypotheses and a review sample
Has a specific requirement or observed coverage gapbuild-test-suiteA compact scenario matrix with checkable expectations
Knows what to measure; needs a Coval metricconfigure-metricsThe simplest suitable metric and a tested rubric
Has a judge; wants to know whether its scores are trustworthycoval-calibrate-metricClass-specific errors on independent human labels, or a labeling plan
Has resources ready and explicitly wants to run themquick-evalA bounded run and a result audit
Has before/after runs; asks whether a change helpedcoval-compare-runsMatched evidence, regressions and comparison limits
Maintains tests/agents/metrics in Git or Terraformcoval-evals-as-codeReviewed configuration changes with retained identity and execution evidence
Has an existing evaluation setup; wants a trust/coverage auditcoval-eval-auditPrioritized findings tied to actual Coval artifacts

These are installed skill names, not shell commands. Locate the selected skill in the agent's installed skill catalog. If absent, explain the missing skill and install it only in the user's intended scope, or perform the bounded task using current public documentation. Do not invent an executable /skill command or assume sibling directories survive a single-skill installation.

Keep the next step small

  • Reuse existing resources. Don't create a second agent, rewrite a production metric, attach defaults, schedule runs, or enable notifications merely to start.
  • For a new voice connection, propose one case, one persona, one iteration, concurrency one. A request to plan or audit does not authorize a paid run. Honor an already authorized execution budget; don't ask again inside it.
  • Before execution, state the selected cases, metric IDs, maximum simulations, call-duration limit, and stopping condition. Count base + every mutation and every persona. Reruns and metric tests consume budget too.
  • When the customer already knows the failure, don't require a large discovery study before adding a useful regression test. Label assumptions as hypotheses.
  • Finished execution is not proof of agent quality. Missing outputs, failed metrics, simulator mistakes and unvalidated judges must remain visible.

Do not call a starter run statistically conclusive or release-certified. End with the evidence obtained and the single next action it supports.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.