pm
Skill873 starsChanged 25 days agoMITView on GitHub
When you want to manage projects across your businesses using a kanban + Eisenhower methodology. One kanban per business (whatever portfolio of businesses, projects, or initiatives you run). Tool-agnostic — connects via API/MCP to whatever PM tool each business uses (Notion, GitHub Projects, Plane, Linear, Obsidian file-based, or manual mode). Async-first output. Six modes — setup (scaffold a new board for a business), triage (Eisenhower-sort the backlog), next (pick the next thing to work on, single board or across all), status (paste-ready async snapshot), unblock (diagnose Review/Blocked column), weekly (Friday pulse + week planning). Triggers on "/pm," "/pm setup," "/pm triage," "/pm next," "/pm status," "/pm unblock," "/pm weekly," "what should I work on next," "kanban status," "Eisenhower this," "triage my backlog," "what's blocked.
- Reads credentials
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 34
Async-first: every status snapshot should read like a Loom you didn't have to record.
- Very specific: line 53
Read ${MAKERSKILLS_CONFIG:-$HOME/.config/makerskills}/pm/boards.md (personal — real business list + tool mapping per business).
- Distinctive: line 64
If the business has no mapping yet, jump to setup automatically — ask which tool, save the mapping, return to the requested mode.
- Very specific: line 68
Read the relevant section of references/adapters.md for the tool.
- Distinctive: line 70
Read a single card's full content
- Distinctive: line 73
Add a comment / note
- Distinctive: line 86
Ask which tool the business uses
- Distinctive: line 131
Read everything in Review/Blocked
- Very specific: line 144
Default WIP per column (override in your local boards.md per business):
- Very specific: line 151
If WIP exceeded in next mode, don't pull more — recommend finishing or moving something to Review/Blocked first.
- Distinctive: line 155
When generating status / weekly outputs:
- Distinctive: line 176
No verbs without subjects: Write status so the reader can pick up cold — 3 weeks later or forwarded to a partner who missed the last update.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/pm — Project management across the portfolio
Methodology-first project management. Kanban + Eisenhower + async. One board per business. Tool-agnostic via adapters.
Mental model
Each business gets its own kanban with 5 columns:
Backlog → Ready → In Progress → Review/Blocked → Done/Archived- Backlog: everything that might matter — not yet committed
- Ready: triaged, well-defined, can be picked up
- In Progress: actively being worked
- Review/Blocked: waiting on someone else, review, or external dependency
- Done/Archived: shipped or killed
Eisenhower sits on top of the board — used to triage Backlog → Ready (which items make the cut) and to pick next from Ready (which Ready item to pull).
Urgent Not Urgent
Important Q1: Do Q2: Schedule ← Q2 is the high-leverage zone
Not Important Q3: Delegate Q4: DeleteAsync-first: every status snapshot should read like a Loom you didn't have to record. Make work visible without requiring a meeting.
Step 1 — Detect mode and target
Parse the invocation:
| Invocation | Mode | Target |
/pm setup [business] | setup | the named business |
/pm triage [business] | triage | the named business (or ask) |
/pm next [business] | next | the named business |
/pm next | next | across all boards (cross-portfolio) |
/pm status [business] | status | the named business (or ask) |
/pm unblock [business] | unblock | the named business (or ask) |
/pm weekly | weekly | all boards (Friday pulse) |
/pm weekly [business] | weekly | the named business |
Step 2 — Load board config + personal overlay
Read ${MAKERSKILLS_CONFIG:-$HOME/.config/makerskills}/pm/boards.md (personal — real business list + tool mapping per business). Falls back to references/boards.md in the repo if the local file doesn't exist yet — that's a template.
Also try to load ${MAKERSKILLS_CONFIG:-$HOME/.config/makerskills}/pm/team.local.md if present — this is where the user lists partners, active clients, and typical blocker phrasings. Use it to make status output specific ("Waiting on <partner>'s review") instead of generic.
| Field | Example |
| business | <slug> |
| tool | notion / github / plane / linear / obsidian / manual |
| board_id or URL | tool-specific |
| column overrides | only if this board doesn't use the default 5 columns |
If the business has no mapping yet, jump to setup automatically — ask which tool, save the mapping, return to the requested mode.
Step 3 — Load the adapter
Read the relevant section of references/adapters.md for the tool. Each adapter section explains how to:
- List cards / issues / pages by column
- Read a single card's full content
- Create a card
- Move a card between columns
- Add a comment / note
Adapters use:
- Notion →
$NOTION_API_KEY(already in zshenv). Database withStatusselect property. - GitHub Projects →
ghCLI (already authed).gh project item-list,gh project item-edit. - Plane → Plane API (needs
$PLANE_API_KEYand workspace slug). - Linear → Linear MCP or API key.
- Obsidian → local kanban markdown files in the vault. Read/write directly.
- Manual → ask the user to paste the current board state; offer to write back to a local markdown file.
Step 4 — Run the mode
setup
- Ask which tool the business uses
- Walk through column setup (default 5 columns; offer custom)
- Save mapping to
${MAKERSKILLS_CONFIG:-$HOME/.config/makerskills}/pm/boards.md(NOT toreferences/boards.mdin the repo — that's a template only). Create the parent directory if it doesn't exist yet. - Optionally seed the board with starter cards from a conversation about what's on the user's mind for that business
triage
- Pull the Backlog column
- Apply Eisenhower (Q1/Q2/Q3/Q4) — show the user the matrix view
- Recommend moves:
- Q1 (urgent + important) → move to Ready or In Progress now
- Q2 (important, not urgent) → move to Ready, schedule when
- Q3 (urgent, not important) → delegate (to whom?) or move to Ready if no one
- Q4 (neither) → archive
- Apply moves via the adapter (or output text the user applies manually)
next
- Single board: pull Ready, then In Progress. If WIP exceeded, surface what to finish first. If WIP available, recommend top Ready item by Eisenhower priority.
- Cross-portfolio (
/pm nextwith no business): pull Ready from every board, Eisenhower-rank, recommend top 1–3 across all businesses. Bias toward Q1 then Q2.
status
Generate an async-shareable snapshot:
# [Business] — Status as of YYYY-MM-DD
**Shipped this week:** N cards
- <card title>
- <card title>
**In progress:** N cards
- <card title> — <who/what>
**Review/Blocked:** N cards
- <card title> — blocked on <reason>
**Up next:** top 2–3 from Ready
- <card title>
- <card title>
**Open question:** <one thing that would unblock progress if answered>Output is paste-ready for Slack, Notion, email, partner DM.
unblock
- Read everything in Review/Blocked
- For each card: surface the blocker, suggest an action (nudge X, escalate to Y, descope, kill, move back to In Progress if blocker is gone)
- Output a short list of moves
weekly
Friday pulse + planning:
- For each board: shipped this week, in progress, blocked
- Cross-portfolio: where's momentum? where's drift?
- Plan next week: 3–5 Q2 items to pull from Ready into In Progress on Monday
- Output the combined snapshot — pasteable into Notion weekly log, partner update, or personal journal
WIP limits
Default WIP per column (override in your local boards.md per business):
| Column | Default WIP |
| In Progress | 3 |
| Review/Blocked | (no limit — but flag if >5) |
If WIP exceeded in next mode, don't pull more — recommend finishing or moving something to Review/Blocked first.
Async-first writing rules
When generating status / weekly outputs:
- Lead with the headline — what shipped this week, or what's at risk
- Be specific — "shipped X" not "made progress on Y"
- No verbs without subjects — write so the reader can pick up cold
- Blockers name the blocker — "waiting on designer's review" not "blocked"
- Open questions are explicit — one bolded line per status that asks for what would unblock momentum
Composes with
decide— when a project hits a real decision, route to/decidedeep-research— when a card needs research before it's actionablebusiness-brainstorm— when an idea on the Backlog deserves pressure-testing before triagejab-hook— when status / shipped items become BIP-post material- Memory (
project_*.md) — for portfolio context per business
Notes on quality
- Limit WIP. Multitasking is the most reliable way to ship nothing. Cap In Progress at 3 (override in your local
boards.mdper business if truly needed). If the cap is hit, don't pull more — recommend finishing or moving something to Review/Blocked. - Lead with the headline in every status output — what shipped this week, or what's at risk. Not "made progress on X" — that's noise.
- Be specific. "Shipped the primary logo variant" beats "made progress on branding." Specificity signals real motion; vagueness signals none.
- No verbs without subjects. Write status so the reader can pick up cold — 3 weeks later or forwarded to a partner who missed the last update.
- Blockers name the blocker. "Waiting on designer's review of the homepage draft" — not "blocked." Blockers without names create no urgency.
- Open questions are explicit — one bolded line per status that asks for what would unblock momentum. Async momentum lives or dies on how well open questions are surfaced.
- Tool-agnostic by design. pm speaks Kanban + Eisenhower; the adapters (Notion / GitHub / Plane / Linear / Obsidian / manual) translate. Adding a new tool = one adapter file, not a rewrite.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- business-brainstormSkill
- company-brainSkill
- company-cfoSkill
- decideSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- domainSkill
- ingestSkill
- jab-hookSkill
- loopifySkill
- maker-councilSkill
- pasteSkill
- personal-cfoSkill
- radarSkill
- read-bookSkill
- second-brainSkill
- skillifySkill
- slide-deckSkill
- social-fetchSkill
- toolifySkill
- unstuckSkill
- watch-videoSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

