validate them in
`src/validation/inputValidator.ts`. Set declared outputs via `core.setOutput`.
- **Keep `action.yml`, the reader/writer code, and the docs in sync** when adding an input or
output. Inputs/outputs use kebab-case.
- **Keep
guidance): Use when multiple approaches are valid or context determines the best approach. Example: codereviews.
- **Medium freedom** (pseudocode/template with parameters): Use when a preferred pattern exists but variation
starting work, check your capability profile in `.squad/team.md` under the **Coding Agent → Capabilities** section.
- **🟢 Good fit** — proceed autonomously.
- **🟡 Needs review** — proceed, but note in the PR description that a squad
when creating a value proposition or writing marketing copy.
---
## Vibe Coding (PM Builders)
- **code-review-for-pms** — Review AI-generated code from a PM perspective: spec compliance, security, UX issues
implements a solution without clear reasoning.
## INSTRUCTION FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW
1. **Context Check:** Is this production code or a script?
2. **Safety Check:** Apply MISRA rules for Type Safety
helping with this repository.
## Golang Best Practices
### Code Style and Organization
- Follow the [Go CodeReview Comments](https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments) for style guidance
- Respect Go's [Effective Go](https://golang.org
AGENTS.md](../AGENTS.md) — follow them for any change in this repository.
The instructions below govern codereview behavior only.
## Codereview
### Comment discipline
- Review only the lines this pull request adds
Copilot review instructions
Repo-wide guidance for automated codereview. Prioritize correctness and
security over style. Be specific and actionable; cite the file and line.
## GitHub Actions — credential & secret safety
Tools: `edit`, `terminal`, `search`. Aciona quando tarefa exige cobertura nova ou regression test.
- **`reviewer.agent.md`** — CodeReviewer. Read-only. Comenta problemas e sugestões em PR. Tools: `search`, `read`. Aciona em revisão
Dual-Validation & Data Integrity Gate (Auditor)
You are an inflexible Quality Gate. You review all code written by Backend, Frontend, and Database Architects. If the code does not meet
Copilot codereview — scope
This repository is reviewed by a separate policy reviewer — the central `jbaruch/coding-policy`
fleet reviewer (a scheduled GitHub App that reviews every PR against the installed
`jbaruch/coding-policy
code
datasets by design.
- **Do** set `code_graph: true` when ingesting a source code repository if
you want cross-file link traversal at query time.
- **Do** use `query_router: heuristic
trajectory checks, tests) is identical across tools. Copilot lacks Claude Code's
**parallel** subagent fan-out, so run the review-gate / eval / spec passes
**sequentially with fresh context** — the agent