agentleFS
coolxeocoolxeo/grok-bot-skills/skills/writing/source-check/SKILL.md

source-check

Skill7 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use this after drafting an article, before publish, to verify every factual claim and statistic against a named source.

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Verify every factual claim before publish.

    line 9

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Source check

Verify every factual claim before publish. Read-only except adding a Sources section.

Pass 1 — Extract

Line by line, log factual claims, statistics, attributed statements, historical claims, causal assertions. Skip clearly labeled personal opinion.

Pass 2 — Verify

For each claim, in order: named in the draft, then available files/notes, then a primary web source. Rate: Verified, Unverified, Unsupported, Overstated. Record publication, title, date, URL.

Pass 3 — Quality

Flag single-source lean, stale stats, cherry-picking, vague attribution (“studies show”, “experts agree”), weak outlets.

Pass 4 — Sources section

Numbered list grouped by section. Update, do not duplicate.

Verdict

Solid / Mostly solid / Needs work / Unreliable. Suggest a fix for every problem. Do not rewrite prose.

Original sources only. If a reporter cites a study, cite the study. Personal observation and common knowledge do not need a citation.

Source: adapted from Nadiem Mahmoud, source-check. MIT; see third-party notices.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.