agentleFS
cookieMonsterDevcookieMonsterDev/agents-skills/skills/docs/stripe-docs/SKILL.md

stripe-docs

Skill7 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub

Official Stripe documentation, answered with links to the exact pages. Use for any Stripe question, including Payment Intents, Checkout and Elements, Billing and subscriptions, Connect, webhooks, testing, or the Stripe API.

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use connect-required-verification-information and stripe-pay.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • StripeSkill

    connect-required-verification-information

    Use this skill when the user asks what information a Stripe Connect connected account must provide for verification, onboarding, KYC, or account requirements; when they need to compare requirements between connected-account setups; or when they ask which verification fields, documents, or business details are required for a particular platform country, account country, business type, dashboard, service agreement, or capability.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • StripeSkill

    stripe-pay

    Helps users send funds to another Stripe business, transfer money to a Stripe Profile handle or network ID, or ask whether an agent can pay a Stripe business. Use Stripe Directory to find or verify a recipient when the user doesn't provide an exact Stripe Profile handle or network ID.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Verify API parameter names, webhook event names and error codes against the API reference before citing them.

    line 32
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep secret API keys on the server.

    line 34
  3. Distinctive:

    Check the idempotency and event-ordering docs before treating webhook events as ordered or delivered once.

    line 35
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep test mode and live mode keys and data apart.

    line 36
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep Connect (multi-account marketplace) concepts apart from single-account Billing or Payments.

    line 37

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Stripe Docs

Stripe API versions, webhook event names and integration patterns change frequently, and mistakes cost real money, so ground each answer in the live docs at https://docs.stripe.com/, not memory, and link the exact page behind every claim.

Generic e-commerce or checkout UX belongs outside these docs unless it turns on Stripe's prebuilt components (Checkout, Elements, Payment Links). Other processors (PayPal, Adyen, Braintree) belong to their own docs unless the user is comparing them to Stripe, and tax law or accounting goes beyond these docs except where Stripe Tax or Stripe's revenue recognition docs cover it.

Workflow

  1. Locate the question in references/topic-map.md, a selective index of docs entry points. Done when each part of the question maps to a section of the map, or you have noted that none fits.
  2. Search docs.stripe.com with the user's exact terms plus Stripe vocabulary such as PaymentIntent, webhook signature, idempotency key, Connect account, or subscription schedule, starting from the map's pages and the Routing rules below. Done when you hold the one page that most directly answers each part.
  3. Read each page down to the relevant section. Done when you have read the passage behind every claim you will make. When a page has moved, been renamed, or stops short, say so and link the nearest authoritative pages.
  4. Answer with the direct answer first, each docs link beside the claim it supports, and API requests or SDK code only when the user asks or the page needs them. Mark any conclusion that joins several pages as Inference:. Done when every claim cites a specific page, not the docs home.

Routing

  • Large pages: append .md to any docs path (for example https://docs.stripe.com/payments.md) to read its Markdown version.
  • Request and response shapes: the API reference, before guide pages.
  • Payment flows: tell Payment Intents (custom UI) from Checkout (hosted page), Payment Links (no-code) and Elements (embeddable components).
  • Subscriptions: the Billing docs, telling subscription schedules from simple recurring prices.
  • Marketplaces: the Connect docs, after confirming Standard, Express or Custom accounts.
  • Webhooks: the signature verification docs, before writing handler code.
  • Errors: the API errors reference and the card decline codes page, over generic HTTP status codes.
  • API keys: tell publishable keys (client-side) from secret keys (server-side), then check the current key-management guidance.

Gotchas

  • Verify API parameter names, webhook event names and error codes against the API reference before citing them.
  • Confirm the user's Stripe API version before answering version-sensitive behavior.
  • Keep secret API keys on the server; client-side code uses publishable keys.
  • Check the idempotency and event-ordering docs before treating webhook events as ordered or delivered once.
  • Keep test mode and live mode keys and data apart.
  • Keep Connect (multi-account marketplace) concepts apart from single-account Billing or Payments.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.