agentleFS
Sign inStart free
conjurer-richconjurer-rich/skills/skills/engineering/mutation-testing/SKILL.md

mutation-testing

Skill1 starsChanged 15 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

Set up and run mutation testing with Stryker, including full-project and focused diff runs against the current review base, then use surviving mutants to strengthen weak or missing tests. Use as the end-of-phase PR-readiness gate after implementation and refactoring are complete, not inside each RED-GREEN increment. Also use when the user explicitly asks for mutation testing, Stryker, mutation score, or surviving-mutant analysis. For writing the tests themselves, see testing.

30 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use domain-modeling and code-review.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • GoogleSkill

    domain-modeling

    Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when the user wants to pin down domain terminology or a ubiquitous language, record an architectural decision, or when another skill needs to maintain the domain model.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    code-review

    Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

23 rules. 0 are common, 17 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 27 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 17

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 27 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free