agentleFS
conikeecconikeec/desk/SKILL.md

desk

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

House-style desk for ALL prose output — routes every written artifact through domain standards plus a deterministic lint pipeline. Use whenever writing OR editing any prose, even if the user doesn't mention desk or ask for editing - blog posts, essays, website/landing copy, meta/OG tags, pull request descriptions, commit messages, READMEs, docs, changelogs, release notes, announcements, press releases, social posts, emails. Also trigger on "desk:", "run through desk", "simplify", "tighten", "de-AI this", or any request to review/rewrite existing text.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions3 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 3

    1. angletech2026-arch/desktop-sense★ 16same name
    2. aylee/agent-os★ 0same name
    3. zacfink/claude-code-setup★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every prose artifact has two readers: a human who skims (one pass, first sentences, zero patience for decoding) and, for outward-facing …

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Ask only on genuine forks (two rows with different rules both fit — e.g.

    line 82

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

desk — the routing copy desk

Every prose artifact has two readers: a human who skims (one pass, first sentences, zero patience for decoding) and, for outward-facing surfaces, an LLM that extracts and recommends. desk enforces one house style for both, with domain overlays, through a fixed pipeline. Analysis is computed where possible; inference is quarantined and labeled.

Three tiers — know which one you're in

  • Tier 0 (computed): scripts/lint.py — rule IDs, JSON output, no model judgment. Same input, same output. Run it; don't emulate it.
  • Tier 1 (checkable): model-executed tasks with auditable output against ground truth — conservation diff, extraction test vs canon. Wrong rows are visible.
  • Tier 2 (inference): value/positioning/recommendation judgments. These go ONLY in the report's SPECULATIVE section. Never present Tier 2 output with Tier 0/1 confidence.

Pipeline (fixed — do not reorder or skip)

ROUTE → PLAN → DRAFT → LINT → CONSERVE → SKIM → GEO? → REPORT
  1. ROUTE — resolve domain via the decision table below. Cite the row number that fired.
  2. PLAN — read canon.md + references/core.md + the routed module. For GEO routes, also references/ai-search.md, and list the target prompts this artifact should win BEFORE drafting.
  3. DRAFT — write (or rewrite). When editing existing text, first build the conservation inventory: every fact, number, condition, scope qualifier, and named actor in the original.
  4. LINT — run python3 scripts/lint.py <file> --canon canon.md [--format <route>]. Fix every fail. Each surviving warn is either fixed or waived with a one-line justification citing a law or rule: WAIVE S-01 L42: precision requires length (Law 1).
  5. CONSERVE — (edits only) diff the rewrite against the inventory in a table: item | status (kept / moved / waived) | where. Nothing silently vanishes.
  6. SKIM — lint.py already emitted the mechanical extract (title + H2s + first sentence per paragraph). Judge it: does the extract alone carry the full argument, in order, as claims not topics? Verdict: pass/fail + the first sentence that breaks it.
  7. GEO — (GEO routes only) see references/ai-search.md § Checks: extraction test against canon attributes, recommendation smoke test against named alternatives, renderability note.
  8. REPORT — fixed schema, always:
    • Route + table row fired
    • Lint summary (fails fixed, warns + waivers, corpus stats)
    • Conservation table (edits only)
    • Skim extract + verdict
    • GEO results (if routed)
    • SPECULATIVE: Tier-2 judgments, clearly separated Then the artifact itself. For quick/small artifacts (a tweet, an email), compress the report to one line per stage — but never skip LINT or SKIM.

ROUTE — decision table

Ordered; first match wins. Tiebreaker: the destination decides, not the content — where will this text live, who reads it there. Explicit user routing ("desk: blog") is row 0 and always wins.

#Signal in request/contextModuleGEO overlay
0User names the route ("desk: pr", "apply website rules")as namedper module
1Diff, branch, commit, "PR for this change", review requestreferences/pr.mdno
2CHANGELOG, release notes, version tag copyreferences/announcement.mdyes
3Press release, launch/funding/partnership announcementreferences/announcement.mdyes
4README, docs/ path, tutorial / how-to / reference / explainer requestreferences/docs.md (then sub-route via Diátaxis)yes
5Landing page, meta/OG tags, feature or pricing copy, anything for the website reporeferences/website.mdyes
6Essay, Substack, blog post, "post about", title requestreferences/blog.mdyes
7Social post (tweet/LinkedIn), destined to be crawledcore onlyyes
8Email, DM, chat message, commentcore onlyno
9No matchask ONE question: "Where will this live?"—

Ask only on genuine forks (two rows with different rules both fit — e.g. "write the announcement" could be row 3 press-shaped or row 6 blog-shaped). Otherwise default; never ask twice.

Always loaded, regardless of route

  • The Two Laws (from references/core.md): (1) Clarity beats compression — never drop a condition, qualifier, actor, or fact to shorten a sentence; keep precision and flag the trade-off. (2) The skim must carry the argument.
  • Canon glossary (canon.md § Glossary): one name per concept, every route — a PR that calls a Play a "workflow snapshot" is synonym drift. Canon's positioning sections load only on GEO routes.

Files

  • canon.md — Modiqo positioning, attribute claims with evidence, glossary
    • banned synonyms, competitive alternatives, target prompts. THE ground truth for C-rules and GEO checks. User-editable; keep it current.
  • references/core.md — sentence/word/structure rules + ban list (rule IDs S/W/B live here with rationale).
  • references/{blog,website,pr,docs,announcement}.md — domain overlays (F-rules) with their canonical sources.
  • references/ai-search.md — the two-reader GEO overlay + checks (G-rules).
  • scripts/lint.py — Tier-0 linter. Trust its output over your impression; adjudicate false positives against the rule ID, in the report, never silently.

Honesty constraints

  • Tier-0 heuristics (passive voice, hedges) false-positive; those rules emit warn, not fail. Log adjudications.
  • The GEO recommendation test is a single-model smoke test, not measurement. Say so in the report, every time.
  • desk stands down for fiction, poetry, and deliberately literary prose — note it and write freely.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.