release-prep
Skill41 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub
Curate every program's accumulated changelog fragments into its entry for the next release, then create the release-notes pull request. Use when explicitly asked to prepare release notes or invoked as `/release-prep [version]`.
- Commits and pushes
23 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- microsoft/durabletask-pythontheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- Terryc21/sitreptheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- kala-project/acp-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- finch-xu/cc-routertheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- barlevalon/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- opencrvs/opencrvs-coretheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Other versions23 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- hay-kot/hive-desktop★ 475% same
Wrote their own version · 22
- dathere/qsv★ 3.8ksame name
- Devolutions/IronRDP★ 3.3ksame name
- johnhuang316/code-index-mcp★ 1ksame name
- Trampoline-AI/predict-rlm★ 436same name
- Fu-Jie/awesome-openwebui★ 326same name
- Fu-Jie/openwebui-extensions★ 326same name
- finch-xu/cc-router★ 293same name
- ten9876/AetherSDR★ 259same name
- ayutaz/piper-plus★ 240same name
- opencrvs/opencrvs-core★ 122same name
12 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- cli-autocalibrateSkill
- cli-smokeSkill
- cli-tuiSkill
- desktop-apiSkill
- desktop-commands-auditSkill
- desktop-devserverSkill
- desktop-shipped-skillsSkill
- desktop-ui-auditSkill
- desktop-ui-perfSkill
- docs-auditSkill
- docs-pageSkill
- go-enumSkill
- release-notesSkill
- releaseSkill
- sqlcSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 21 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 57
Clean: run mise run changelog:promote, adding -- --bump <level> for a bump level or -- <version> for an explicit version.
- Very specific: line 74
Read the promoted entry, its deleted source fragments from HEAD, and recent committed entries for voice and structure.
- Very specific: line 81
write one quoted summary sentence that names the release's main user-facing outcomes.
- Distinctive: line 84
remove notes for work reverted before this release.
- Distinctive: line 85
update stale bullets so they describe the behavior that will ship.
- Distinctive: line 87
remove empty sections and keep the remaining sections in that order.
- Distinctive: line 89
do not mention implementation names, commits, issues, pull requests, or ADRs.
- Distinctive: line 90
do not invent claims that the fragments or repository history do not support.
- Distinctive: line 92
Follow the release-notes skill's product-copy rules.
- Distinctive: line 99
Read each complete entry again after editing.
- Distinctive: line 105
Run the focused parser tests and the release tool's dry run:
- Distinctive: line 112
Run git diff --check, then read each complete entry and the deleted-fragment list one final time.
- Very specific: line 124
If the command says it committed and pushed but gh pr create failed, the promotion is already safe on the release-notes branch.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 21 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Prepare release notes
Prepare the changelog entries that must land before a release. Every release ships the hive CLI and Hive Desktop under one version, so promotion writes one entry per program. This command edits product copy, then delegates the branch, commit, push, and pull request to the repository's release tooling.
The version this promotes is the version the release publishes: mise run
release reads it from the entries.
Arguments
Accept no argument, one bump level (patch, minor, or major), or one
explicit version such as 0.60.0. No argument means minor. The release tool
bumps the newest version across every tag and live manifest by that level.
Reject a prerelease, a v prefix, and extra arguments.
1. Load the project rules
Resolve the repository root with git rev-parse --show-toplevel, change to it,
and run every command from there. Read these files before editing:
../release-notes/SKILL.mdfor product-copy rules;docs/distribution.mdfor the current release contract.
The repository command mise run changelog:pr is the authority on the branch,
commit, push, and pull request. Do not use pr-create-auto, create the branch by
hand, or write a separate commit.
2. Validate the starting state
Run:
git fetch origin main --tags --prune
git status --porcelain=v1 --untracked-files=all
git branch --show-current
git rev-parse HEAD
git rev-parse origin/main
gh auth statusRequire main, HEAD equal to origin/main, and successful GitHub
authentication. Do not pull, reset, stash, switch branches, or discard work to
make the checks pass.
Two worktree states are valid:
- Clean: run
mise run changelog:promote, adding-- --bump <level>for a bump level or-- <version>for an explicit version. - Already promoted: continue without promoting again when the only changes
are one untracked
<version>.mdin each ofcmd/hive/releasenotes/changelog/andcmd/desktop/releasenotes/changelog/, all for the same version, and deleted files under theirunreleased/directories.
For an already promoted tree, require the entry filename to match an explicit version argument. Any other dirty state is unrelated work. Stop and report it.
Promotion writes an empty summary, combines each program's fragments into
its entry, and deletes those fragments. A program with no fragments still gets
an entry, with an empty body. Never create or rename a versioned entry by hand.
3. Curate the entries
Curate each program's entry on its own: its readers are that program's users.
Read the promoted entry, its deleted source fragments from HEAD, and recent
committed entries for voice and structure. Read the commit history since the
last release when a note needs verification. Inspect a focused diff only
when the history does not establish the user-visible behavior.
Edit each promoted entry as one release, not as a list of pull requests:
- write one quoted
summarysentence that names the release's main user-facing outcomes; - combine bullets that describe the same feature or surface;
- remove notes for work reverted before this release;
- update stale bullets so they describe the behavior that will ship;
- order bullets by user value within
Added,Changed, andFixed; - remove empty sections and keep the remaining sections in that order;
- preserve specific UI labels, shortcuts, config keys, and platform differences;
- do not mention implementation names, commits, issues, pull requests, or ADRs;
- do not invent claims that the fragments or repository history do not support.
Follow the release-notes skill's product-copy rules. The summary and each bullet must describe what the user gets in the release. Do not write a work log or a release-process summary.
An entry with an empty body still needs a summary. Say in one sentence that
the release has no user-facing changes to that program; do not invent any.
Read each complete entry again after editing. Check that the summary covers the body, near-duplicate bullets are gone, and every sentence still describes the current product.
4. Verify and create the pull request
Run the focused parser tests and the release tool's dry run:
go test ./cmd/hive/releasenotes/... ./cmd/desktop/releasenotes/...
mise run changelog:pr -- --dry-runRun git diff --check, then read each complete entry and the deleted-fragment list
one final time. Fix all failures before continuing. Then run:
mise run changelog:prThis command creates the fixed release-notes branch, commits only the promoted
entries and deleted fragments, pushes the branch, and opens the pull request. The
git hooks run the repository checks. Do not duplicate those steps with manual
git or gh commands.
If the command says it committed and pushed but gh pr create failed, the
promotion is already safe on the release-notes branch. Follow the recovery
command from the error exactly and do not promote or commit again. For any
other failure, stop without rewriting history or changing branches to hide the
problem.
Report the version, summary, branch, commit, pull request URL, and tests that ran.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

