speckit.plan
Skill438 starsChanged 54 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty). Output: research.md with all NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved Prerequisites: research.md complete Output: data-model.md, /contracts/*, quickstart.md, **db-migration.md when St
3 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- caipe-io/ai-platform-engineeringword for word, first seen Sep 22, 2026
- wedabro/bro-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 18, 2026
- compnew2006/Spec-Kit-Antigravity-Skillsedited, first seen Jan 26, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- caipe-io/ai-platform-engineering★ 438100% same
Edited · 1
- compnew2006/Spec-Kit-Antigravity-Skills★ 6870% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- wedabro/bro-skills★ 3same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .cursor/rules/docker-compose-first-install.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/safe-git-worktree.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/specify-rules.mdcCursor rule
- docker-compose-first-installSkill
- local-integration-testingSkill
- release-docsSkill
- run-caipe-integration-testsSkill
- skillsSkill
- speckit.analyzeSkill
- speckit.checklistSkill
- speckit.clarifySkill
- speckit.constitutionSkill
- speckit.implementSkill
- speckit.specifySkill
- speckit.sync-templateSkill
- speckit.tasksSkill
- speckit.taskstoissuesSkill
- streaming-testingSkill
- ui-performance-benchmarkSkill
- update-docsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 34
Setup: Run {SCRIPT} from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_SPEC, IMPL_PLAN, SPECS_DIR, BRANCH.
- Very specific: line 36
Load context: Read FEATURE_SPEC and /memory/constitution.md.
- Very specific: line 38
Execute plan workflow: Follow the structure in IMPL_PLAN template to:
- Distinctive: line 86
Document the contract format appropriate for the project type
- Distinctive: line 96
Update the appropriate agent-specific context file
- Distinctive: line 97
Add only new technology from current plan
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- Generate implementation plan from a spec --><!-- AUTO-GENERATED — DO NOT EDIT --><!-- Source: .specify/templates/commands/plan.md --><!-- Regenerate: make generate-agent-files -->description: Generate implementation plan from a spec handoffs:
- label: Create Tasks agent: speckit.tasks prompt: Break the plan into tasks send: true
- label: Create Checklist agent: speckit.checklist prompt: Create a checklist for the following domain... scripts: sh: scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh --json ps: scripts/powershell/setup-plan.ps1 -Json agent_scripts: sh: scripts/bash/update-agent-context.sh AGENT ps: scripts/powershell/update-agent-context.ps1 -AgentType AGENT
User Input
$ARGUMENTSYou MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Outline
- Setup: Run
{SCRIPT}from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_SPEC, IMPL_PLAN, SPECS_DIR, BRANCH. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot"). - Load context: Read FEATURE_SPEC and
/memory/constitution.md. Load IMPL_PLAN template (already copied). - Execute plan workflow: Follow the structure in IMPL_PLAN template to:
- Fill Technical Context (mark unknowns as "NEEDS CLARIFICATION")
- Fill Constitution Check section from constitution
- Evaluate gates (ERROR if violations unjustified)
- Phase 0: Generate research.md (resolve all NEEDS CLARIFICATION)
- Phase 1: Generate data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md
- Phase 1: Database migrations — When Storage is not N/A, generate
db-migration.md(or e.g.mongodb-migration.md): required vs no-op, schema/index/backfill, rollback; linkdata-model.md. Stateless: omit file; note N/A in plan.md. - Phase 1: Update agent context by running the agent script
- Re-evaluate Constitution Check post-design
- Stop and report: Command ends after Phase 2 planning. Report branch, IMPL_PLAN path, and generated artifacts.
Phases
Phase 0: Outline & Research
- Extract unknowns from Technical Context above:
- For each NEEDS CLARIFICATION → research task
- For each dependency → best practices task
- For each integration → patterns task
Generate and dispatch research agents:
For each unknown in Technical Context: Task: "Research {unknown} for {feature context}" For each technology choice: Task: "Find best practices for {tech} in {domain}"- Consolidate findings in
research.mdusing format:- Decision: [what was chosen]
- Rationale: [why chosen]
- Alternatives considered: [what else evaluated]
Output: research.md with all NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved
Phase 1: Design & Contracts
Prerequisites: research.md complete
- Extract entities from feature spec →
data-model.md:- Entity name, fields, relationships
- Validation rules from requirements
- State transitions if applicable
- Define interface contracts (if project has external interfaces) →
/contracts/:- Identify what interfaces the project exposes to users or other systems
- Document the contract format appropriate for the project type
- Examples: public APIs for libraries, command schemas for CLI tools, endpoints for web services, grammars for parsers, UI contracts for applications
- Skip if project is purely internal (build scripts, one-off tools, etc.)
- Database migrations (when feature uses persisted storage):
- Produce
db-migration.mdor project-specific name in the feature spec directory per plan template
- Produce
- Agent context update:
- Run
{AGENT_SCRIPT} - These scripts detect which AI agent is in use
- Update the appropriate agent-specific context file
- Add only new technology from current plan
- Preserve manual additions between markers
- Run
Output: data-model.md, /contracts/*, quickstart.md, db-migration.md when Storage ≠ N/A, agent-specific file
Key rules
- Use absolute paths
- ERROR on gate failures or unresolved clarifications
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

