agentleFS
cmdr-characmdr-chara/chara-toolkit/skills/flutter-production-builder/SKILL.md

flutter-production-builder

Skill2 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub

Build or audit production Flutter applications. Use when Flutter is already selected and implementation, integration, performance, accessibility, or release behavior is in scope. Not for choosing the mobile platform or a Flutter SDK upgrade.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill for implementation or audit of an existing Flutter app across state, routing, data, persistence, offline behavior, platform …

    line 12
  2. Very specific:

    Do not trigger when platform choice is unresolved.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Verify scanner signals manually.

    line 26
  4. Distinctive:

    Prefer built-in Flutter/Dart capabilities or an existing repository convention when sufficient.

    line 31
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not silently add packages, regenerate platform projects, change signing, or publish releases.

    line 32
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep secrets out of client bundles/logs and keep authorization at trusted server boundaries.

    line 33
  7. Very specific:

    Choose packages conditionally: Use references/package-selection.md only when a dependency decision is material.

    line 39
  8. Distinctive:

    Implement clear ownership: Keep local UI state, server data, durable state, navigation, and native/platform behavior in the layer that owns …

    line 40
  9. Very specific:

    Handle offline/data deliberately: Read references/offline-and-data.md for persistence, sync, conflict, migration, encryption, and …

    line 41
  10. Distinctive:

    Verify feature behavior: Use focused tests plus representative device/platform checks for plugins, deep links, permissions, background, …

    line 42
  11. Very specific:

    Prepare release when requested: Read references/release-checklist.md only for signing/build/store work.

    line 43
  12. Very specific:

    Use product-design-director or screenshot-to-interface for unresolved UI intent, security-review for security-focused review, …

    line 47
  13. Distinctive:

    If package/platform claims are stale, verify current primary sources.

    line 51
  14. Distinctive:

    Stop when the requested Flutter behavior is integrated, focused checks and applicable platform/build evidence are recorded, and remaining …

    line 55

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Flutter Production Builder

Build production Flutter behavior from repository and platform constraints, not from a default package stack.

Trigger boundary

Use this skill for implementation or audit of an existing Flutter app across state, routing, data, persistence, offline behavior, platform integration, accessibility, performance, build, or release.

Do not trigger when platform choice is unresolved; use mobile-architecture-director. Version/SDK transitions whose central issue is compatibility belong to codebase-evolution-controller.

Required inputs

Resolve repository/working-tree state, Flutter/Dart/package-manager constraints, target platforms, product flows, backend/device contracts, offline/data requirements, accessibility/localization, build/signing/release targets, and protected user work.

For read-only inventory:

python skills/flutter-production-builder/scripts/flutter_project_inventory.py . --format markdown

Verify scanner signals manually.

Safety baseline

  • Preserve uncommitted work.
  • Prefer built-in Flutter/Dart capabilities or an existing repository convention when sufficient.
  • Do not silently add packages, regenerate platform projects, change signing, or publish releases.
  • Keep secrets out of client bundles/logs and keep authorization at trusted server boundaries.

Workflow

  1. Map architecture/lifecycle. Identify feature boundaries, routing, state/data ownership, persistence, platform channels/plugins, background work, and release configuration.
  2. Model states. Define loading, empty, error, retry, offline/stale, auth, permission, interruption, process death/restoration, and recovery.
  3. Choose packages conditionally. Use references/package-selection.md only when a dependency decision is material; verify compatibility, maintenance, license, security/deprecation, runtime/build cost, and built-in/existing alternatives.
  4. Implement clear ownership. Keep local UI state, server data, durable state, navigation, and native/platform behavior in the layer that owns their lifecycle.
  5. Handle offline/data deliberately. Read references/offline-and-data.md for persistence, sync, conflict, migration, encryption, and idempotency concerns.
  6. Verify feature behavior. Use focused tests plus representative device/platform checks for plugins, deep links, permissions, background, accessibility, performance, and platform conventions.
  7. Prepare release when requested. Read references/release-checklist.md only for signing/build/store work.

Handoffs and interaction boundaries

Use product-design-director or screenshot-to-interface for unresolved UI intent, security-review for security-focused review, codebase-evolution-controller for migrations, debugging-investigator for concrete unexplained failures, documentation-synchronizer for drift, and verification-and-release for final ship judgment.

Failure handling

If package/platform claims are stale, verify current primary sources. If native/device evidence is unavailable, state the gap rather than treating Dart-only tests as equivalent proof.

Stop conditions

Stop when the requested Flutter behavior is integrated, focused checks and applicable platform/build evidence are recorded, and remaining release gaps have a clear owner.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.