verification-loop
Skill153 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Comprehensive verification system for Claude Code sessions. Use after implementation to validate correctness.
84 other projects use a version of this, 64 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Rojios/everything-claude-codeedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lhbsaa/apex-unifiededited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ahmadvahidi/skill-atlasedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- shkodnik1917/claude-brainlabedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemonedited, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- ek0212/agent-ready-repo-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use everything-claude-code, everything-claude-code-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
InfopibeSkilleverything-claude-code
Also in 10 projects that use this
mryeastcodeSkilleverything-claude-code-conventions
Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.
Also in 8 projects that use this
InfopibeSkillinvestor-materials
Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets.
Also in 25 projects that use this
niloykumarbarmanSkillagent-sort
Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.
Also in 8 projects that use this
tpavanipradeepSkillnextjs-turbopack
Next.js 16+ and Turbopack — incremental bundling, FS caching, dev speed, and when to use Turbopack vs webpack.
Also in 15 projects that use this
CodeWithBehnamSkilldmux-workflows
Multi-agent orchestration using dmux (tmux pane manager for AI agents). Patterns for parallel agent workflows across Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and other harnesses. Use when running multiple agent sessions in parallel or coordinating multi-agent development workflows.
Also in 17 projects that use this
- +1 more from Infopibe
Other versions84 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 64
- affaan-m/ECC★ 246k44% same
- Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar★ 5.9k31% same
- loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes★ 27245% same
- cohen-liel/hivemind★ 10845% same
- tpavanipradeep/everything-claude-code★ 10445% same
- mturac/everything-openai-codex★ 8944% same
- mit-network/everything-claude-code★ 7645% same
- Fmarzochi/EGC★ 6144% same
- ysyecust/everything-claude-code★ 4445% same
- shkodnik1917/claude-brainlab★ 3531% same
54 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 20
- xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh★ 1.9ksame name
- openJiuwen-ai/agent-core★ 464same name
- Resgrid/Core★ 238same name
- MRCalderon3D/everything-game-dev-code★ 105same name
- talayash/agentrium★ 48same name
- mhylle/claude-skills-collection★ 20same name
- Benkapner/claude-code-basecamp★ 17same name
- YehudaFrankel/clankbrain★ 16same name
- Yog-Sotho/claude-skills★ 4same name
- zhaoyii/my-skills★ 4same name
10 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- rules/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- backend-patternsSkill
- clickhouse-ioSkill
- cloudnative-writing-baselineSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- eval-harnessSkill
- frontend-patternsSkill
- project-guidelines-exampleSkill
- prompt-patternsSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- strategic-compactSkill
- tdd-workflowSkill
- web-content-extractionSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 5 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
5
Common
Most of the 78 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 14
After completing a feature or significant code change
- Common: line 15
Before creating a PR
- Common: line 16
When you want to ensure quality gates pass
- Very specific: line 24
Check that the project builds.
- Common: line 26
If the build fails, STOP and fix before continuing.
- Very specific: line 29
Run the project's type checker if it has one.
- Very specific: line 34
Run the project's linter. Examples: npm run lint, ruff check ., shellcheck.
- Very specific: line 37
Run the project's test suite, with coverage if available.
- Distinctive: line 46
Check for leaked secrets in the changes:
- Distinctive: line 47
If a dedicated scanner is available (gitleaks, trufflehog), use it.
- Common: line 67
After running all phases, produce a verification report:
- Distinctive: line 91
If you need periodic automated re-verification, use a hook or the /loop command.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 78 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Verification Loop Skill
A comprehensive verification system for Claude Code sessions.
When to Use
Invoke this skill:
- After completing a feature or significant code change
- Before creating a PR
- When you want to ensure quality gates pass
- After refactoring
Verification Phases
Pick the right command for each phase from the project's own configuration (package.json scripts, Makefile, CI workflow, etc.). The commands below are examples, not prescriptions. Summarize long output instead of pasting it verbatim.
Phase 1: Build Verification
Check that the project builds. Examples: npm run build, cargo check, go build ./..., shellcheck -S warning *.sh.
If the build fails, STOP and fix before continuing.
Phase 2: Type Check
Run the project's type checker if it has one. Examples: npx tsc --noEmit (TypeScript), pyright . or mypy . (Python).
Report all type errors. Fix critical ones before continuing.
Phase 3: Lint Check
Run the project's linter. Examples: npm run lint, ruff check ., shellcheck.
Phase 4: Test Suite
Run the project's test suite, with coverage if available. Examples: npm test -- --coverage, pytest --cov, bash tests/run-unit-tests.sh.
Report:
- Total tests: X
- Passed: X
- Failed: X
- Coverage: X% (against the project's target)
Phase 5: Security Scan
Check for leaked secrets in the changes:
- If a dedicated scanner is available (gitleaks, trufflehog), use it.
- Otherwise, follow the bundled security-review skill.
- At minimum, review the added lines of
git difffor credentials, tokens, and keys. Do not report PASS based on a repository-wide grep.
Also check for leftover debug output (e.g., console.log, print) in the changed files.
Phase 6: Diff Review
# Show what changed
git diff --stat
git diff HEAD~1 --name-onlyReview each changed file for:
- Unintended changes
- Missing error handling
- Potential edge cases
Output Format
After running all phases, produce a verification report:
VERIFICATION REPORT
==================
Build: [PASS/FAIL]
Types: [PASS/FAIL] (X errors)
Lint: [PASS/FAIL] (X warnings)
Tests: [PASS/FAIL] (X/Y passed, Z% coverage)
Security: [PASS/FAIL] (X issues)
Diff: [X files changed]
Overall: [READY/NOT READY] for PR
Issues to Fix:
1. ...
2. ...Integration with Hooks
This skill complements PostToolUse hooks but provides deeper verification. Hooks catch issues immediately; this skill provides comprehensive review. If you need periodic automated re-verification, use a hook or the /loop command; instructions in this skill body cannot schedule themselves.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

