pedagogy-review
Skill2 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run holistic pedagogical review on academic slides and educational documents. Checks narrative arc, student prerequisites, worked examples, notation clarity, and deck pacing. Supports .tex, .qmd, and .typ slide decks.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowedited, first seen Nov 7, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow★ 1.7k48% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository23 other files it gives its agents.
- compileSkill
- context-statusSkill
- create-documentSkill
- deploySkill
- devils-advocateSkill
- diagramSkill
- doc-reviewSkill
- excellenceSkill
- extract-diagramsSkill
- finishSkill
- google-tasksSkill
- image-searchSkill
- learnSkill
- mindmapSkill
- proofreadSkill
- qaSkill
- sec-edgarSkill
- translateSkill
- typstSkill
- validate-bibSkill
- verifySkill
- visual-auditSkill
- waybackSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
If no argument, ask user which lecture to review
- Very specific: line 16
If just a name, Glob the project for a matching .tex, .qmd, or .typ file
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Pedagogical Review of Slides and Educational Documents
Perform a comprehensive pedagogical review. Supports Beamer (.tex), Quarto (.qmd), and Typst (.typ) slide decks.
Steps
- Identify the file specified in
$ARGUMENTS- If no argument, ask user which lecture to review
- If just a name, Glob the project for a matching
.tex,.qmd, or.typfile
- Launch the pedagogy-reviewer agent with the full file path
- The agent checks 13 pedagogical patterns
- Performs deck-level analysis (narrative arc, pacing, visual rhythm, notation)
- Considers student perspective (prerequisites, objections)
- Save the report the agent returns to:
quality_reports/[FILENAME_WITHOUT_EXT]_pedagogy_report.md - Present summary to user:
- Patterns followed vs violated (out of 13)
- Deck-level assessments
- Critical recommendations (top 3-5)
Important Notes
- This is a read-only review — no files are edited
- Focuses on pedagogy not visual layout (use
/visual-auditfor that)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.