test-first
Skill80 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Drive one feature through a strict TDD Red-Green-Refactor cycle with checklists for each phase. Use when implementing new functionality test-first, or when the user runs /test-first.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Write a failing test
- Distinctive: line 13
Run test, confirm failure
- Distinctive: line 14
Write minimal code to pass
- Distinctive: line 84
Follow TDD strictly. No shortcuts.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test-Driven Development
Implement TDD for: $ARGUMENTS
Quick Steps
- Write a failing test
- Run test, confirm failure
- Write minimal code to pass
- Refactor while keeping tests green
- Repeat
Red Phase - Write Failing Test
Test Design Principles
- Test one specific behavior
- Test name describes expected result
- Test should fail (feature doesn't exist yet)
Must Test
- Normal case
- Edge cases
- Error cases
- Invalid input
Example
// auth/login.test.ts
it('should return JWT token for valid credentials', async () => {
const res = await request(app)
.post('/auth/login')
.send({ email: 'test@example.com', password: 'password123' })
expect(res.status).toBe(200)
expect(res.body.token).toBeDefined()
})Green Phase - Minimal Implementation
Implementation Principles
- Write ONLY enough code to pass the test
- Don't optimize yet
- Don't worry about elegance
- Just make it work
Refactor Phase - Clean Up
Refactoring Checklist
- Is there code duplication?
- Are variable names clear?
- Are functions too long?
- Is the logic too complex?
Refactoring Rules
- Keep tests passing
- Change one thing at a time
- Run tests frequently
Test Quality Checklist
- Unit tests cover core logic
- Integration tests cover interactions
- Test names clearly describe intent
- Tests are independent and repeatable
- Tests run fast (unit tests < 100ms)
- Edge cases are covered
Follow TDD strictly. No shortcuts.
Other versions23 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 23
- JordanCoin/codemap★ 707same name
- llopresto87/Cypress★ 119same name
- NoobyGains/godmode★ 115same name
- s-hiraoku/synapse-a2a★ 17same name
- bmtrnavsky/disciplined-vibe-coding★ 11same name
- dfedoryshchev/weftworks★ 5same name
- eeshsaxena/agent-skills★ 2same name
- sergvss/agents-best-teams★ 2same name
- atgreen/hackinator★ 1same name
- DBAAZzz/skills★ 1same name
13 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use security-sweep, refactor and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
n24q02mSkillsecurity-sweep
Graph-driven security sweep -- scan for dangerous sinks, then rank each finding by whether an entry point can actually reach it, and triage the rest into suppressions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GitHubSkillrefactor
Surgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior. Covers extracting functions, renaming variables, breaking down god functions, improving type safety, eliminating code smells, and applying design patterns. Less drastic than repo-rebuilder; use for gradual improvements.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillapi-design
Guide for designing and documenting RESTful APIs. Use when asked to design an API, create endpoints, or document an API.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 4 projects that use this
SentrySkillskill-creator
Create new agent skills following the Agent Skills specification. Use when asked to "create a skill", "add a new skill", "write a skill", "make a skill", "build a skill", or scaffold a new skill with SKILL.md. Guides through requirements, writing, registration, and verification.
Also in 3 projects that use this
In this repository36 other files it gives its agents.
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- changelog-observerSkill
- agent-checkSkill
- agentsSkill
- agent-templateSkill
- auto-loopSkill
- changelogSkill
- check-environmentSkill
- claude-md-checkSkill
- claude-md-templateSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- debuggerSkill
- director-modeSkill
- doc-writerSkill
- evolving-loopSkill
- evolving-statusSkill
- focus-problemSkill
- getting-startedSkill
- handoff-claudeSkill
- handoff-codexSkill
- handoff-geminiSkill
- handoff-grokSkill
- hooks-checkSkill
- hook-templateSkill
- interop-routerSkill
- mcp-checkSkill
- planSkill
- project-health-checkSkill
- project-initSkill
- session-relaySkill
- skill-checkSkill
- skillsSkill
- skill-templateSkill
- smart-commitSkill
- test-runnerSkill
- workflowSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

